The auto companies get nothing but another opportunity to come up with a plan
By spalladino
@spalladino (17891)
United States
November 20, 2008 1:16pm CST
Senator Harry Reid is saying that they are giving the automakers until Dec. 3rd. to come back with a plan and that Congress will meet again on Dec. 8th. They want accountability and viability before they can agree to give them any money.
So, what do you think? Do you believe that they'll be able to come up with a decent plan....and do you think they'll fly Coach when they return to D.C.?
6 responses
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
21 Nov 08
The kind of rescue they need requires major reorganization and so many inconveniences for upper management... no, they will not come up with anything decent. Even if they do come up with something halfway reasonable and doable... as soon as they have the money in their hand, they'll just misuse it again or waste it, because one key ingredient will be missing, proper oversight. Although congress has finally learned a lesson of not blindly handing out money and the need of some sort of plan, accountability and even oversight, they'll just kindly forget about it in this case once the money changed hands. I see nothing good coming out of this unless the three big automakers are forced to reorganize, until the union is forced to make some concessions, until they finally learn that they need to think competitively as in they are not the only game in town... which also means a change in management, major change.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
22 Nov 08
The more I've thought about it, the more I believe that Chapter 11 is the best option for all of them. This would force the kind of reorganization that's needed in this situation.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
21 Nov 08
If htey are smart they will fly coach. But who said these guys are smart. If they were smart than they would not be in this mess would they?
I am just glad Congress learned a lesson. They gave out trillions to the banks and wallstreet with no strings attached. And look what happened. The money was not used the way it was suppost to be. Instead of using the money to lend credit to people like they were suppost to, the banks used it to buy out other banks. So that bail out did not do us any good. Wall street used part of their bail out to pay multi million dollar bonuses to their executives or for big fancy retreats for the higher ups. Congress should have safe guarded that money BEFORE it was given out.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
22 Nov 08
The CEO's from the Big 3 should take a page from Lee Iacocca's turn around of Chrysler and offer to work for $1.00 like he did. He also had a plan and asked the government for loan guarantees, not actual loans.
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
20 Nov 08
They should have to present a business plan - the same as they would have to if they were asking for financing from a bank (or at least most banks). They should have to show that their companies are able to make a comeback with the funds that they want.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Nov 08
I wish them a lot of luck with that one. This plan has to be viable...not just a bandaide placed on a gunshot wound that's bleeding horribly.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
22 Nov 08
I think that they will be really working hard to come up with a good business plan in that short amount of time. I hope that they will at least take a commercial flight, it makes it hard to feel sorry for the auto makers when they aren't being business smart lol
@evanslf (484)
•
21 Nov 08
There are a lot of jobs depending on the Big 3 car makers. I am unsure whether a bailout will work and if such a bailout is to be given, Congress are quite right to demand a thoroughly viable plan - there is absolutely no point giving these companies money only for them to lose it all and go bust 6 months down the line. And we should ensure that there is accountability: ie the CEOs and boards of these failed companies should be made to resign on receipt of a bailout and be replaced by a new board. The new board members also should not be allowed to have any bonuses as bonuses should only be paid once these companies return to profit. And they can get rid of their private jets!
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Nov 08
They'll provide what they *think* is a decent plan...but then again, these are the same guys who thought it was perfectly okay to travel by private jet to beg for a government handout.






