Talk radio at it's worse

United States
January 4, 2009 7:14pm CST
For the last twenty years a talk radio channel in the city I live has made it their mission to change the mostly democratic government. They have tried time and time again to help republicans win elections, and defend their corruptions. They have failed at both. Now they are trying another tactic: The radio station is trying to recall the mayor of the city. Two memebers of the stations managment are part of a group that is attempting to recall a mayor that they couldn't defeat in an election. The other funny part of this story is that NO ONE in the group actually lives in the city that they hate so much, and none of them can vote to recall him. The question I have for you is do you think that actions like this could prompt more people to want a new "Fairness Doctrine"? I personally don't feel that this would be good for the country, but this situation is going to far.
1 person likes this
2 responses
• United States
5 Jan 09
Actually it is the right of hte people that live in the area to recall an elected official if they want. The poeple on the radio can bring it up and talk about it (freedom of speech and all that)....but if the people in the area are not interested it will not get them any where. So I say there is no harm in this. The only way it is going to happen is if the voters in the area get together and decide if they want it. So let them talk all they want. IT is not hurting anyone if the voters like the current mayor they will ignore them and if he does get recalled it will be because the votered decided it was a good idea and exercised their right to recall. So why is it going too far? At the end of the day the voters get the final say. Which is as it should be. As for the fairness doctrine.....very very bad idea. If you do not like what you are hearing then turn the dial or press the button to get to another channel. It is that simple. We do not have a need for a so called "fairness doctrine".
2 people like this
• United States
5 Jan 09
Well even if the news paper did it if none of them are voting in his area it would do them no good. They would have to recruit a mass of local voters. I am not saying it is a great thing to do. But I am saying without the a majority of the local voters getting involved it would be wasted time. And if the mass majoirty of the voters did get involved then it would a case of the voters deciding he needed to go. Which would mean he did something extremely bad. As a whole we will put up with a bad poltican until the next election. Something extremely bad has to happen to actually motivate that many people to actually act on a recall. Heck I heard some talk radio and other places during the election talking against Obama during the election......that did not stop him from winning. So how much power does talk radio actually have?
1 person likes this
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
5 Jan 09
It's not much different from local newspapers curbing their 'reporting' of events in an attempt to manipulate the masses. Even the MSM is guilty of that, lol. IMO, the time of neutral reporting and responsible use of 'airwaves' have long been over. One can only hope that people know better and can look beyond 'hate speeches'. Personally I think the Fairness Doctrine is a terrible idea. People just have to learn to check several sources before forming their own opinion. The media in any form is not much different than the stump speeches of the olden days. They are just reaching more people. People who want to influence the opinion of others will find a way. If not over the airwaves, it'll be through other means of communication. People who are pro Fairness Doctrine should take that into consideration. Also, that not too many people really listen to those talk radio hosts and also totally believe what is being said. Rush Limbaugh for example, yes, there are a lot of people who listen to him, the majority probably agrees with most of his opinions. But I have also found that most of his listeners think that while they like his ideals at least for the most part he is a too extreme. In the case of what is taking place in your city... well, people who dislike the mayor will listen, only a few might follow a call to action, the rest will laugh or just turn off the radio or change the channel. Crazies can be found anywhere;)
2 people like this
• United States
5 Jan 09
Thanks for your response Jonesy. I agree that the fairness doctrine is not in the best interest of the country, nor do I think that it would work the way people think. But, I think that people need to look at cases like this, and try to explain to these people what could happen because of their actions. The man that is mayor has called on the state senator, and congressman to reintroduce the doctrine, and with cases like this, he might just get his way. I agree with you on talk radio, and the MSM, but I have never seen anyone from the MSM actively try to get someone thrown out of office, and has gone to the extreme of personally getting petitions signed. I agree that you can find Crazies anywhere.
1 person likes this
• United States
5 Jan 09
Well recalls not always a bad thing. Some politicans deserve to get thrown out of office. Look at all the scandels we have had in the past year alone. There are times when a recall is needed and the voters get to decide when it time to exercise that right. IT sounds to me like this guy is scared of loosing his job (the mayor) so he wants to shut them (the radio hosts) up. When what he should be doing is a good job so no one listens to them. Which would solve the problem without even needing the stupid "fairness doctorine".