Have "Man Made Climate Change" Models ever been used to make actual predictions?

Tweet

Science is about making predictions, if a scientific concept is true, the predictions come true. If the concept is flawed, the predictions don't. Science has taught that the planets were X number of miles from the earth. It could only be demonstrated on paper until the space program sent out probes. We know that science was right about distances because the probes passed or landed on the target planets as predicted. The Old Farmer's Almanac has been right in their predictions about the weather. Without taking any of the "global climate change" models into consideration, they have predicted the climate for the farming industry for as long as the publication has been around. On the other hand, NONE of the global climate change models predicted this winter or last winter's decrease of temperature. All of them said that the global temperature is tied directly to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Yet as far as anyone knows, the CO2 hasn't gone down at all, but the global temperature has! The incompetent press and the alarmists want us to believe that there is no more room for debate... actually, in that they are right. There is no more room for debate... The models used to sell the pig-in-a-poke called "man caused global climate change" are computer enhanced hallucinations. Or worse yet, a lie perpetuated by social engineers and tyrants.