Over a Decade Later, What did the Tobacco Settlement Accomplish?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
March 24, 2009 10:48am CST
Back in 1997, the 4 biggest Tobacco companies finally lost the lawsuits against them. The pinchpoint of the case was a memo which proved conclusively that the powers that be in the industry know how addictive and dangerous their product really is.
The settlement required the tobacco industry to pay $365.5 billion to all 50 states and 6 territories. The first payment wasn't the end, the settlement is perpetual.
So, over a decade later, what has been accomplished? How have the states and territories used the money?
Token amounts have gone to "stop smoking" campaigns, which have met with some success. But where did the rest go?
The rest went into "general funds" of the states, paying for everything but health care and anti smoking campaigns. But that isn't the only windfall the states have enjoyed from the nasty habit.
Cigarette taxes have propped up state revenues for a long time now. They have become such an intregal part of the states' budgets, they can't afford to see people quit smoking.
Gov. Doyle, of Wisconsin stated that part of the reason for the huge budget shortfall was due to falling far short of the $449 million projected from cigarette taxes. The actual take was a little over $40 million.
But money aside, what has been accomplished?
Yes, there are fewer smokers now than there used to be. While I'm willing to guess that some of that reduction is from the anti smoking campaigns, but I'd say the bulk of the whopping 3% reduction of smokers in the US since 97 is more due to a change in society than some government PSAs.
Those of you who are my age or older remember a time when smokey rooms were the norm. There weren't "smoking" and "non smoking" areas in restaurants, there were ashtrays at every table.
Ash trays weren't just at restaurant tables, they were everywhere.
Smoking was so prevelant that having a cigarette was considered a legitimate reason to take a break at work... pretty much any time one felt the urge. When I was in Army Basic Training, smokers were guaranteed a chance to smoke a cigarette after each meal. Cigarette machines were almost as common as candy machines now... in fact, there were more cigarette machines around than candy machines.
The government may claim credit for the reduction in smoking, but the facts don't support them. The settlement wasn't until 1997, but the biggest reduction in smoking in modern history was in the 80s. In 1980 33.2% of the country smoked, but by 1990 it was down to 25.5%. In the 90s, the percentage dropped to 23.3. Today it is down to 20.8%.
So, before the settlement money was "used" to convince us all not to smoke, 7% of the people who smoked decided to kick the habit (or died), but once the money for the settlement kicked in, the rate of reduction slowed dramatically.
So, again, what has been accomplished?
2 people like this
3 responses
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
24 Mar 09
We have more non profit (government leaches) groups fighting to forced their views on everyone else. No smoking in public building, no smoking in private Bars, and even now trying to stop people from smoking in their home or cars.
I remember reading an article that said the reason for the decline in smoking was Hollywood not showing people smoking on TV or in the movies.
With the coming of Cable and the old movies and TV reruns smoking became popular again.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
24 Mar 09
yeah, I heard there is a group trying to get the MPAA to automatically rate any film or TV show that shows a person smoking as "R" or "M".
I never thought I'd see the day when The Brady Bunch would be considered harmful to kids ;~D
1 person likes this
@3SnuggleBunnies (16374)
• United States
3 Apr 09
Even better where is that extra tax money that kicked in yesterday going to go my fellow Wisconsinite?
@betsyraeduke (2669)
• United States
3 Apr 09
I don't know.
If I had to guess I would guess......
nothing!




