What's your take on the G-20 riots?

First off, I don't think that they are riots. More like a public protest framed by the powers that be as a riot to discredit the protesters. There may be some rioters in the bunch. But all in the whole they are mostly peaceful I'm sure. If I was in London now I would be among them and I can assure I am no rioter.

In My opinion riots at the G-20 meeting is reasonable. Riots as an expression angry of many people because the economic crisis is going on. Many workers the sack from the company, while many companies experiencing financial difficulties. Meeting the leaders of countries that joined in the G-20 are expected to provide solutions to the economic crisis. But that often happens, G-20 conference does not give results as expected. However, it does not mean I agree with riots in London. If the disturbance is to cause damage can make the world economy worsened.

The riots were unfortunate. Leaders of G20 are not there in London for celebrating any holidays..but they are there to discuss the most pressing problems of contemporary times. Their policies may be responsible for the mess, but it does not mean that don't allow them to mend their ways. The riot was started by the protesters, they initiated and the riot police responded aggresively. After the emergence of the recession there has been lots of protests by anti capitalists, however, this turns out to be a violent protest. These type of incidents should not happen, recessions are a part of capitalist economy. Capitalism provides the best source to enjoy the freedom. But who will teach these communists minded people. They are condemning the whole capitalism. However, it is fact that capitalism has not failed but it is some greedy capitalists who failed and their actions lead to a vicious cycle. This is the best chance for the protesters since almost all the leaders of G 20 countries were there. Sometimes, publicity matters.