dim-witted ideas

@jb78000 (15139)
August 13, 2009 9:22am CST
In this case dim-witted green ideas. The scottish government is considering building yet another wind farm on a peatbog. this time a huge one in shetland. this will have the sensible result of releasing a huge amount of carbon, on top of damaging what is a delicate environment in the first place. has your government come up with anything that's supposed to help the environment but will actually have the opposite effect, or is ill-thought out for some other reason?
5 responses
• United States
13 Aug 09
What I love most about the pushes for "green" Is the solar panels :P Because hefty chunk of the energy they will produce in their life time, was needed just to make them, But noone EVER thinks about where they come from or how much energy the factory needed to make them... I also love "Upcycling" in many cases like making jewlery and accessories out of aluminum cans "OMG that is so cute, and good for the environement!" said about a pop can tab belt, But now you have a harder time recylcing it again, they could've been used again and again by melting them down, but nooooo we need jewlery. I would love to see a return to glass milk bottles and the milk man coming to my house every day, It would really depend how you look at it, whether or not it would be "green" but the less wasteful plastic created and used, That is what I measure it by, there would be more electricity and gasoline used, and some resources wasted, but I would like to see a return to that... I also hate one of their carbon reducing ideas for like coal plants and stuff that litterally CAN'T reduce their carbon output for a long while, they plan on pumping that carbon into ocean water (I don't know if its into tanks of ocean water or actually into the ocean) and it reacts with a natural chemical in the water to create a new kind of concrete that they could then sell... Personally I wan't to know what the long term effects of that are.
1 person likes this
@N4life (851)
• United States
13 Aug 09
Environmental issues, like politcal ones are rarely as straightforward as they may seem,thus we have environmental scientists, who believe it or not often take their work very seriously. An environmenta Life Cycle Analysis' can be found for any energy source and virtually any product these days as there is an entire field "Industral Ecology" devoted to such issues. The energy involved in manufacturing, transporting, reycycling/destruction of solar panels has been studied over and over again one example: http://www.nrel.gov/pv/thin_film/docs/fthenakis_bnl_lca_doe_nov_05final.pdf There have been some boneheaded things done in the name of protecting the environment, but these are often things initiated by industry or politicians (sometimes backed by misinformed but well intentioned misc. groups). In the inteim there has always been responsible env scientists and members of env. PAC's that care about the environment and promote responsible agendas.
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
i'm just going to check but i think the energy used to make solar panels is taken into consideration. things like making accessories out of cans are pointless, doesn't make anyone look like they care about the environment, it just makes them look like they pounce on any passing trend. and yes it's counterproductive. liked the bit about glass milk bottles. and there are lots of bad ideas of ways to reducing c02 output emerging
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
to reduce
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
13 Aug 09
Lets see, how about those stupid curly flourescent light bulbs? They cost 10 times as much to buy, despite claims to the contrary they don't last any longer, they are made over seas, in countries with horrendous environmental standards in factories with a cabon foot print that would make sasaquach jealous, then put on carbon belching diesle powered ships to be sent here. If you break one, there is a 17 step proceedure outlined by our environmental protection agency you must go through because they contain so much toxic mercury.
1 person likes this
@N4life (851)
• United States
13 Aug 09
Some valid points about CFL's xfahctor. The issues are not so straight forward however. The EPA and the NREL as well as numerous independent orgs have demonstrated numerous times that the mercury saved from using a CFL through burning less coal more than makes up for any direct contaminatin. Not that CFL's do not present a problem.
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
importing them from overseas defeats the object. i think they might save very small amounts of energy but they are hardly the thing to focus on.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Aug 09
Actually, almost all of the things forced on us in the name of "the environment" have backfired. Not all of them, but most. Which is why I'm convinced it's more about power than the environment.
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
which ones?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
13 Aug 09
Which ones? Environmentalists complained that too many trees were being used making paper bags; that is how the plastic grocery bag was born. Now they complain about plastic bags. The environmentalists complained that the government was using pesticides in the forests to control the population of dung beetles. They got legislation passed to bad it. Now the dung beetle has killed off thousands of acres of trees. Environmentalists and corn growers here in Wisconsin pushed for laws encouraging the use of ethanol mixed with our gasoline. They said that it would reduce polution and our dependence on foreign oil. Using the mixture reduces gas mileage significantly, so we have to fill our tanks more often and use more gas from foreign oil. The water sources around ethanol plants are getting polluted and there is no significant reduction in emissions from the mix. Environmentalists in California got so many regulations passed about electricity production that almost all of their power is now purchased from other states. This has led to brown outs, so the sale of gasoline powered generators has skyrocketed. So when there are brown outs, millions of gasoline powered generators get fired up. Environmentalists push for more cities to turn to mass transit. In efforts to make mass transit more enticing, city planners have used traffic lights and city codes to make using cars less convenient in cities. The longer cars are kept in standing stops and "stop and go" traffic, the higher the rate of pollution. They actually want to increase pollution so they can justify mass transit in cities where there isn't a need for it.
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
the answer to both paper bags and plastic ones is to reuse them, plastic bags are a problem and not just because of the energy and materials required to make them. that ethanol one is a good one. well mass transit is in itself a good idea and if done properly preferably on the personal side to the strain of driving, but the obvious solution of creating decent public transport must have seemed much too sensible to the officials in charge of wherever you're talking about. adding to the strain of driving instead sounds like the work of those mini-tyrants you get in positions that have a little bit of power everywhere.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
13 Aug 09
LOL I'm sure that they have. Some of the government officals want to drill for oil in ANWAR but, the outcry of people was so that the government send a group up to look and see if animals lived there. They flew over ANWAR so high that they couldn't "see" if animals lived there but, they "didn't think anything lived there". LOL
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
13 Aug 09
LOL I'm sure they didn't think of that response.
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
if they'd said they didn't think any animal larger than a medium sized town.. they'd have been right. good one but looks deliberate to me.
1 person likes this
@vinay316 (300)
• India
13 Aug 09
I think our govn has made some bad decisions and we are facing the consequences of iy now.
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
13 Aug 09
do you have any examples?