sign in • sign up
web   discussions   tasks   blogs   photos

Japanese American Internment And Gitmo Detainees  email this discussion to a friend?

myLot reputation of 62/100. gewcew23 (5064)   ranked 414 out of 3,987 in politics 3 years ago

Once a violation of the Constitution is allowed then violations become easier and easier. Take for instance the internment of Japanese Americans by FDR in 1942, which is 100% violation of the Constitution. To make matters worse in 1944 the Supreme Court ruled the administration action were fully Constitution, all be it that FDR had packed the court with judges that believed that the Constitution did not limited the Federal government in any way. Now fast forward to modern time with the Gitmo Detainee. When you allow the internment of American just because somewhere in their heritage they had Japanese roots, it become that much easier detain non-American just because to think they might be terrorist. Whenever you do not have respect for the Constitution at any time for what ever reason, it become that much easier to ignore the Constitution at another time. The Constitution is not an A` la carte menu that you can chose from when ever you want to. The Constitution is a take it all or leave it. So when FDR and his packed court interned Americans, they gave George W. Bush and now Barack Obama the ability to detain foreigner for as long as they wanted to.

 

politics
sponsors
Thomas Jefferson quotes
Founders quotes bumper stickers
LibertyStickers.com

Pocket Constitution
Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence.
www.MyFreedomLibrary.com

Business Opportunity
Exciting new business opportunity! No franchise fees.
fastyourtr.com

User has not selected a best response.
tags:  constitution, gitmo, japanese americans, violations
 
1. myLot reputation of 78/100. debrakcarey (2673)   ranked 136 out of 3,987 in politics   3 years ago

I think that there is some truth in this. As far as getting the American public to accept things.

Example: Bush did it and you didn't whine and cry....that statement seems to be the ok for Obama to do worse and get away with it!

Thomas Jefferson quotes Founders quotes bumper stickers  LibertyStickers.com
 
2. myLot reputation of 63/100. ParaTed2k (6360)   ranked 325 out of 3,987 in politics   3 years ago

Actually, no part of the U.S. Constitution covers anything to do with the execution of war, foreign nationals not on US soil, enemies during war, or even prisoner taken (during war or otherwise).

The US Constitution was never meant to cover any of this because it never was meant to cover foreign countries in the first place.

The people at GITMO are to be afforded the basic human rights of food, shelter, clothing. Their treatment and faciilies are inspected and monitored by the International Red Cross.

The fact is, if the detainees were reclassified to Enemy Prisoner of War, they would actually be entitled to far fewer rights and priveliges than they do now.

You are right, the Nissei's Constitutional rights were definitely violated, because they were Americans and in The US at their time of incarceration.


myLot reputation of 91/100. flowerchilde (8074)   ranked 52 out of 3,987 in politics  3 years ago

Great clarifying!

Pocket Constitution Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence.  www.MyFreedomLibrary.com
 
sponsors
Police State USA - video
Rock Video opposing government oppression and crimes
youtube.com/watch?v=qvTDJupQdXs

Money Market Rates (MMAs)
Money Market rates from 100s banks Plus news, tips, rates, calcs, etc.
www.Bankrate.com

5 Growth Stocks for 2012
Discover Your Best Opportunities For Safe Portfolio Growth.
www.insideinvestingdaily.com

similar discussions
"Liberal" news The Young Turks takes on Democrats who support NDAA
Attacked by their own fan base, they break down the wording in NDAA in this video and criticize the...
Constitution 101...installment #1. "seperation of church and state
I decided to start this because of a few discussions that quoted the "seperation of church and...
The U.S. oath of enlistment was changed in 1960, good decision?
This change went into effect 2 years later and in 1962 anyone who joined than had to use this oath:...
sponsors
Police State USA - video
Rock Video opposing government oppression and crimes
youtube.com/watch?v=qvTDJupQdXs
Money Market Rates (MMAs)
Money Market rates from 100s banks Plus news, tips, rates, calcs, etc.
www.Bankrate.com
5 Growth Stocks for 2012
Discover Your Best Opportunities For Safe Portfolio Growth.
www.insideinvestingdaily.com
return to mylot
We are loading a word from our sponsors. No thanks, cancel loading.