Should we Trust the Drug Companies & Their Lobbyists? How about the FDA?
By debrakcarey
@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
October 30, 2009 8:39pm CST
[I]n the first six months of this year alone, drug and biotech companies and their trade associations spent more than $110 million — that’s about $609,000 a day — to influence lawmakers, according to figures compiled by the nonpartisan watchdog group Center for Responsive Politics. The drug industry’s legion of registered lobbyists numbers 1,228, or 2.3 for every member of Congress. And its campaign contributions to current members of Waxman’s committee have totaled $2.6 million over the past three years.
Here's the link: http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/10/22/how-the-pharmaceutical-industry-bought-its-way-into-congress-heart/#comment-116623
Here's what happens as a result of special interest lobbying.
Meet Bray Patrick-Lake, a 39-year-old mother of two and director of a Colorado nonprofit serving the homeless. In 2008, she volunteered for a clinical trial, regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, testing a medical device designed to close a hole in her heart, in hope of putting an end to the migraine headaches that were ruining her life. Three months later, she found out over the Internet that St. Jude Medical Inc., the manufacturer of the device, had terminated the study.
Now Patrick-Lake can’t find out the results of that clinical trial. That’s because pharmaceutical and medical device industry lobbyists—including those representing St. Jude Medical, Inc. and its trade association, AdvaMed—convinced Congress in 2007 to insert a last-minute provision in the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that allows medical device manufacturers to withhold data disclosure to a public government database, ClinicalTrials.gov, when their products fail to make it to the market.
And the link for this article: http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2009/10/28/how-congress-and-special-interests-kept-clinical-trial-data-secret/
I keep hearing that the drugs and vaccines we are being fed are safe, the FDA says so! But who is watching the FDA? Here's a strange report on just who is running the FDA.
Monsanto was required to submit a scientific report on rBGH to the FDA so the agency could determine the growth hormone's safety. Margaret Miller put the report together, and in 1989 shortly before she submitted the report, Miller left Monsanto to work for the FDA. Guess what her first job was? Strangely enough, to determine whether or not to approve the report she wrote for Monsanto! The bottom line is that Monsanto approved its own report. Miller was assisted by another former Monsanto researcher, Susan Sechen.
And the link is: http://www.smart-publications.com/nutrition/fda.php
So, do you feel safe knowing that drug companies are buying legislation to make theirselves richer by selling us more drugs and vaccines and the FDA is hiring the people whom they are suppose to watch?
4 responses
@DavidReedy (2378)
• United States
1 Nov 09
I have known this very kind of thing for a long time, try explaining this to the common masses, at best you get a blank stare, at worst, the daemonize YOU for trying to tell them this... Of course, you know this is the case with any significant truth.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
31 Oct 09
Very little of what the government and these big international corporations do make me feel safe, secure, or warm and fuzzy either.
Now that government and really big business are collaborating, things can only go downhill from here.
The FDA and all of these other government agencies have evolved into something far exceeding their intended purpose.
Reigning them in is necessary, but that will be difficult.
Maybe instead of sending a reset switch to Russia, we need to send one to DC.
@mikeysmom (2088)
• United States
31 Oct 09
i do not trust either one of them and for good reason. it is all about money and not protecting people from potential harm from these products. there are so many harmful side effects to so many of the meds out on the market that it is a wonder to me why anyone takes them if it is not for a life saving reason. i live with all kinds of physical pain everyday but i refuse to take any of that garbage and make things worse for myself. there are waiver to sign for the H1N1 vaccine saying you cannot hold the pharmaceutical companies responsible if you have an adverse reaction. really, why not? it is almost as if they know ahead of time that it will cause harm so why would anyone get it? boosting your immune system is the key to surviving a flu epidemic.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Nov 09
I asked myself the same question....why can't we hold them responsible? Tells me they're hiding something.



