Owens Sets New Record - Breaks 4 Campaign Promises in 1st 24 hours in office

@Rollo1 (16676)
Boston, Massachusetts
November 7, 2009 12:39pm CST
Voters in the 23rd district in NY have the right to be a little confused today. The Democrat they elected in a close race with the Conservative candidate has done an about-face on the positions he ran on. http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7623:owens-to-break-campaign-promises&catid=60:st-lawrence-news&Itemid=175 "Mr. Owens stated today that he will now vote in favor of those things contrary to what he had promised the voters of NY's 23rd Congressional District that he would vote against." He also stated in his campaign that he was not in favor of cuts in Medicare, new taxes on the middle class or insurance for illegals. "Both FactCheck.org and the Congressional Budget Office agree that HR 3962 contains potentially hundreds of billions of dollars in planned cuts to Medicare, yet Mr. Owens indicates that he supports this legislation and says that it does not cut Medicare benefits. Either Mr. Owens has been snowed or the public is about to be. HR 3962 also includes a range of various taxes on middle-class families as well as language to repeal tax relief already in place." The majority of residents in the 23rd district do not favor the health care reform bill as it is now written and it is possible or even likely that the few thousand votes that won him the election might not have been cast his way if the public had known his true intentions. Is this the way of politics these days? We know that politicians often break promises, but do they now lie to get into office so they can pursue their own personal agenda? Can anyone defend this type of political shenanigans even if they support the health care reform? Don't the voters deserve to know the intentions of the candidate before they vote for him?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@lelin1123 (15594)
• Puerto Rico
7 Nov 09
If this is true then he should not be impeached. To go against everything you stood for and had people voting for you due to what you supposely believed is an outrage. There ought to be a law against this and something should be done to stop it. This is like a movie where the politician is a crook and only wants to have all the power.
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
7 Nov 09
I wonder if NY has a recall process.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
7 Nov 09
I think we all know that politicians do what they think is expedient rather than what they promise, but this is just a little too blatant to be someone who is reconsidering his position based on changing circumstances. This looks like a set-up. The only reason they had a special election is because Obama appointed the Republican who was in that office to a job in the administration. Then the Dems run someone who lies about his positions on the issues.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
7 Nov 09
In some places they can have a recall or vote of no confidence when an elected official so blatantly violates promises he made as a candidate. I know they have those laws in Louisiana and they have them in some form in California.
1 person likes this
@solared (1207)
• United States
8 Nov 09
I believe there has to be a way to fight this, but anyways seem like politics as usual among the dems...
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
9 Nov 09
If they have any method of recall, they should use it on this guy.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
7 Nov 09
Regular people deserve far better than politicians are willing to give them. On places like myLot, it's evident that a lot of us are into blaming the other side and taking no responsibility for our own. But this is the kind of thing that should be uniting people against government in general. Not wanting to be lied to is not a right vs. left thing. I cringe at the thought of a myLot admin defender coming in here and saying, "Well, your side does it too!! blah blah blah!!" It's enough of this crap from ALL politicians. Everyone should ask themselves one extremely simple question: How good are these policies for America if the politicians must heavily and shamelessly promote them through propaganda, smear the opposition relentlessly, and even resort to out-and-out trickery and blatant lying to pull in one more supporter? Is this what any of us want in America!?
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
7 Nov 09
Well, since the current propaganda would label me a racist, right-wing terrorist, Christian rabble-rouser of angry mobs, my opinion on shameless smears might be slightly biased. If you're afraid to say you're going to vote for a piece of legislation and vow that you won't in order to get elected, you're not worthy of office. Better to lose because the voters disagree with you than to win by lying through your teeth. This is not politics as usual, it's something much more sinister.
1 person likes this