Shutting people up only promotes dishonesty and false senses of security.
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
August 18, 2011 2:22am CST
For decades now, the very movement that was once dubbed, "The Free Speech Movement" turned the tables on itself and worked to shut people up.
They came up with a list of words that could never be uttered without swift retribution... no matter the context the words were used.
So now that no one is allowed to say these words, we act like people are more understanding, more caring, and less bigoted than before... Of course, the same movement will deny this if it their agenda requires us to think there is less understanding, less caring and more bigotry.
The reason they can go both ways here is, no one really knows what percentage of the population feels either way. Because no one dares speak in those terms.
This censorship is not only childish, it is simply promoting dishonesty and a false sense of security.
Sorry to burst anyone's stupidity bubble, but just saying the words, especially in the context of the words themselves, in no way implies hate or bigotry.
If I use the word "n1gger" (which of course, I can't actually type here, because of MyLot silliness), I am simply saying a word. Now, if I put it in the context of name calling, then yes, it is fair to infer that I am racist against Americans of African Decent. However, if I simply use the term in the context of the word itself, it means nothing... and it is actually bigoted and unfair of anyone to assume that I have any racist motivation, because no racism was implied.
On the other hand, I can use terms that are every bit as bigoted, in the context of belittling and prejudging entire groups of people, based on my own preconceived ideas. When I do this, the very people who have created this list will laugh, joke and repeat the slur at will.
Why? Because those words have no been included by the PC powers that be.
In other words, it has nothing to do with hate, bigotry or any other negative emotion... it is nothing but one group of people working to silence anyone they consider unworthy of freedom of speech.
4 responses
@Lakota12 (42600)
• United States
18 Aug 11
I think this political politeness is way out of context and as the word ya say or wrote is like you say by self means notiihng and reall yhow do we know what other words ya cant use who put them out there.
DO we look for that list or just talk the way we always have?
@djbtol (5493)
• United States
18 Aug 11
The issue is always lopsided. Those who speak loudest against hate crimes against certain groups of people make a routine practice of dishing out hate towards other groups. The hypocrisy of this situation cannot be discussed, for it too is a hate crime.
Beyond the forbidden words you mention, I think politcal correctness also squelches discussion of ideas and principles.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
18 Aug 11
Judging by the recent political use of such words it is safe to say that outlawing certain words definately does not change the way people THINK. I am remimded of the 'thought police' and 'newsspeak'.
@BalthasarTheRat (656)
• United States
18 Aug 11
This reminds me off a nearby creek that "had" to have it's name changed even though Ni**er Creek was in no way a reference to an individual or group.
We have lost a lot of honesty in conversation by being PC. Sadly I have become so accustomed to it that I speak and write with extreme caution. But still I see bigotry and evil in the world (even in my own backyard, so to speak) so obviously removing certain words from the discusion hasn't ended the underlying ignorance and hatred.
I think those who have introduced political correctness had the best of intentions but it may be making things worse by making it easier to ignore the problems and hide the evil among us.




