Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch

Michael Jackson
@Marcyaz (35316)
United States
January 4, 2016 3:13pm CST
Michael Jacksons Neverland ranch is up for sale for $100 Million dollars. On the property is a tennis court, basketball court and swimming pool. There is a mansion, zoo and an amusement park on the property , the zoo and amusement park are no longer in use. I wonder about the zoo and amusement park. It has twenty two buildings, two guest houses and the main building which also has a movie theater. At one time it also had a fire station but no more. Is this property really worth that amount of money?
20 people like this
19 responses
Alfredo Rossi
@amadeo (111948)
• United States
4 Jan 16
I have no interest in this.If I had the money would not buy it.I find this boring
4 people like this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
4 Jan 16
@amadeo If I had the money I would not buy it either.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
4 Jan 16
@marlina I think even if I had that kind of money it would not be for me as I was never a fan of his.
1 person likes this
Marlina
@marlina (154165)
• Canada
4 Jan 16
Same here, it would not be the kind of property that I would buy at any price.
2 people like this
****DANIELLE****
@VivaLaDani13 (60643)
• Perth, Australia
4 Jan 16
If I had that money I would totally buy it lol For me it would be worth it.
3 people like this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
4 Jan 16
@ VivaLaDani 13 Not me as I never did like him or his fancy ways.
2 people like this
****DANIELLE****
@VivaLaDani13 (60643)
• Perth, Australia
4 Jan 16
@Marcyaz lol yeah not everyone likes him. You either love him or hate him. I looove him. But besides that the land he owned was beautiful.
3 people like this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
4 Jan 16
@VivaLaDani13 Yes, his ranch was certainly something to behold.
2 people like this
Arthur Chappell
@arthurchappell (45002)
• Preston, England
5 Jan 16
I expect the value is down to who owned it more than anything else - surprised it isn't a museum to Jackson like Graceland is for Presley
3 people like this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
5 Jan 16
@arthurchappell I was surprised it was a museum also like Graceland.
2 people like this
Arthur Chappell
@arthurchappell (45002)
• Preston, England
5 Jan 16
@Marcyaz it isn't but it should be
Anna
@LadyDuck (460004)
• Switzerland
5 Jan 16
I would not buy that property even if it was offered at 100 dollars.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@LadyDuck I'm with you I would not buy that property even for one hundred dollars.
1 person likes this
Anna
@LadyDuck (460004)
• Switzerland
7 Jan 16
@ivyparkgirl Well, if you would have all that money the distance is not a problem.
1 person likes this
Robert
@lokisdad (4226)
• United States
5 Jan 16
well considering all of the stuff you mentioned on the property it probably is worth that if not more depending on location and well also because he was so famous regardless of good or bad fame.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@lokisdad I am sure offers will be forthcoming on the property.
1 person likes this
Robert
@lokisdad (4226)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@Marcyaz If I had money I would probably bid on it to have all of that on a property is almost as good as having a private island to yourself.
Nanette Piotrowski
@nanette64 (20364)
• Fairfield, Texas
5 Jan 16
Apparently he didn't have a very good money manager @Marcyaz . Michael's dad was a butthead; nothing those kids ever did was good enough for him. It didn't help that his doctor was more interested in the money he got then Michael's health too. There's probably some billionaire out there who will buy the property.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
I think his dad was his manager for a time and his doctor was not the best. I image someone will buy the property sometime in the future.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@nanette64 His dad was certainly not looking out for Michael's interest but his own even to this day.
1 person likes this
Nanette Piotrowski
@nanette64 (20364)
• Fairfield, Texas
7 Jan 16
@ivyparkgirl Yeah, he is a creep.
1 person likes this
Patsie Hatley
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
5 Jan 16
probalyh is the way property pruces rub as that sounds like on s buyng a cit?b
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
5 Jan 16
@Hatley I guess some people have that kind of money to buy something like that.
celticeagle
@celticeagle (159782)
• Boise, Idaho
5 Jan 16
Yes, it probably is. I thought a movie star owned it after MJ was no longer living there.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
5 Jan 16
@celticeagle I have not seen anything about a movie star living there only that the bank owned it.
1 person likes this
celticeagle
@celticeagle (159782)
• Boise, Idaho
6 Jan 16
@Marcyaz ..No, I didn't mean one lived there, just owned it.
1 person likes this
suzzy3
@suzzy3 (8342)
•
6 Jan 16
That is a lot of money. A developers will make a fortune out of that. It sounds like a small town and not someones home.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
It is a lot of money and does seem more like a small town.
AbbyGreenhill
@AbbyGreenhill (45496)
• United States
5 Jan 16
Someone will buy it and it will become an expensive tourist spot.
1 person likes this
AbbyGreenhill
@AbbyGreenhill (45496)
• United States
7 Jan 16
@ivyparkgirl I wonder who will buy it?
1 person likes this
Sharon
@simone10 (54189)
• Louisville, Kentucky
5 Jan 16
I agree with @amadeo that I wouldn't buy it even if I had the money.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
5 Jan 16
@simone10 Nor would I even if I had that kind of money.
1 person likes this
julito
@antonbunot (11092)
• Calgary, Alberta
5 Jan 16
I am sure no one is interested to buy!
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@antonbunot I think there will be people interested in buying that property if for nothing more than the name of it.
DianneN
@DianneN (247216)
• United States
7 Jan 16
I have no desire to buy that place, not that I could afford it. However, there may be some extremely wealthy fans out there who can. It must be disgusting now.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@DianneN Nor do I have a desire to buy that not that I could afford something like that. I would guess they will be some people interested in buying the property.
1 person likes this
Japneet Boyal
@japneet20 (249)
• New Delhi, India
7 Jan 16
I guess the price is fine. But the property is always dear to the ones to which it belongs.
1 person likes this
marcyaz
@Marcyaz (35316)
• United States
8 Jan 16
@japneet20 I don't know about the price but I imagine the property is worth a lot.
Teep11
@Teep11 (7674)
• United States
5 Jan 16
That's a lot of money. I know that the Ranch included amusement but that amount is unbelievable.
Oshy
@TiarasOceanView (70035)
• United States
4 Jan 16
I would say it is yes, compared to some of the asking prices of other places that are less famously known. Anyone with money I guess it would be worth it.
1 person likes this
Anne Marie Guyer
@LeaPea2417 (36562)
• Toccoa, Georgia
5 Jan 16
Whoever buys it , it would be good for a luxury resort.
Michael Liriano
@BACONSTRIPSXXX (14351)
• West Haven, Connecticut
5 Jan 16
Its hard to see if its really worth all of that money but then again it is also alot of land and its full of expensive luxuries ect
Jessica
@JESSY3236 (19008)
• United States
5 Jan 16
Back when it was first reported that the house was up for sale, I had thought that if I had the money I would buy it, but now I don't think so.