Cancerguard

@AmbiePam (112449)
United States
February 10, 2026 10:41am CST
I saw this on a commercial (it is RX only), and it’s a simple blood test for people ages 50 to 84 that detects 50+ kind of cancers (including hard to detect ovarian, liver and pancreatic). It is not meant to take the place of other screening tests like mammograms or colonoscopies, but just be an added tool for early detection. It is a $689 test right now if your insurance doesn’t pay for it. It’s an encouraging step towards early detection.
14 people like this
13 responses
@BarBaraPrz (51354)
• St. Catharines, Ontario
10 Feb
I wonder if it's available in Canada...
3 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
10 Feb
It says nationwide in the U.S., but I would think if it isn’t available in Canada yet, it will be soon.
2 people like this
• United States
10 Feb
This is great. I didn't know they had this to offer. My daughter always jokes that the future is here, and I guess it is.
3 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
10 Feb
It’s encouraging.
2 people like this
@Tampa_girl7 (54187)
• United States
10 Feb
That is good to hear. They are coming up with so many new medical things.
3 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
10 Feb
It’s a big encouragement.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (371504)
• Rockingham, Australia
11 Feb
That sounds pretty marvellous really. It should mean an earlier diagnosis than might otherwise be the case.
2 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
11 Feb
Yes! You can have it found before any physical symptoms might appear.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (213534)
• United States
11 Feb
I like that idea a lot. I would pay for the test myself if it wasn't covered.
2 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
11 Feb
It seems like a great idea.
1 person likes this
• Defuniak Springs, Florida
11 Feb
I am glad to see a lot more "simpler" tests for early detection. The ColoGuard is probably the one that comes to mind the most. For an at home test. Although collecting a stool sample and mailing it, does sound a little like biological warfare when you really think about it.
2 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
11 Feb
It sure does! That’s the route I’m going when I need a colonoscopy eventually. I just don’t think I could drink the stuff they want you to drink to have a colonoscopy.
• Defuniak Springs, Florida
11 Feb
@AmbiePam I have watched people have to drink it, and it looks horrible. Chris mom did it a few months ago.
1 person likes this
@snowy22315 (202799)
• United States
19h
I don't think it would be worth it, because it could come up with false positives and then you are out 700 bucks or would probably have a major hassle recouping the money.
1 person likes this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
18h
I read more about it, and it had a pretty good record. But then it would have to be pretty effective for doctors to prescribe it. Still, it’s from Cologuard, and that’s not foolproof either. My BIL does Cologuard and I think the margin of error is still 6%, which is a lot if you think about it. It used to be even higher than that.
1 person likes this
@snowy22315 (202799)
• United States
17h
@AmbiePam Yeah, they made progress. I think it used to be 14 percent.
1 person likes this
@FourWalls (82827)
• United States
10 Feb
I have a lot of questions about it…false positives or negatives? “High risk” people (people with family histories of things) eligible? I’d probably much rather trust a similar test from my doctor. Still, it is an advancement in early detection, I’m not discounting that!
2 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
10 Feb
I wondered about the false positives and negatives. Should be easy to prove though by follow up tests.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (493084)
• Italy
11 Feb
We have a very similar test, it detects many different kind of cancer with different accuracy rates. It cannot detect melanoma and urinary tract cancer. It's covered by the National health insurance.
1 person likes this
@wolfgirl569 (129412)
• Marion, Ohio
11 Feb
That's not a bad price either
2 people like this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
11 Feb
It’s really not.
1 person likes this
@DianneN (248679)
• United States
21h
Saw that commercial, too. Will definitely look into it cost or no cost
1 person likes this
@AmbiePam (112449)
• United States
21h
I hope a lot of people will.
1 person likes this
@DianneN (248679)
• United States
20h
1 person likes this
@Kandae11 (57003)
23h
That's really good medical news. Even if it was available here l would not be able to afford it.
1 person likes this
@MarieCoyle (54634)
10 Feb
More and more I realize that some people never, ever go to a doctor unless they have a dire emergency. When there are ways to get around it and do things privately, they usually opt for that. Maybe this will help them, time will tell. As you said, any added tool to detect cancer is welcome.
2 people like this