Agnosticism: The complementary philosophy

Tweet

I'm not afraid to admit that a lot of atheists in this day in age are both embarrassing and extreme in their ideals. They may not go to the effort of hurting people, but as we've seen with the guy who's suing to take the prayer of out of Obama's inauguration ceremony, they can get pushy with their beliefs. In addition, less extreme but equally annoying atheists will go around claiming that Gods don't exist, and/or religious people are less intelligent for their beliefs. Because of all this, many atheists are wary of identifying themselves as atheists, because they believe (thanks to the atheists I mentioned), that atheism is more of an affirmed disbelief in gods. They prefer to identify themselves as "agnostic", since it sounds less extreme and decisive. The problem with identifying oneself as an agnostic is that agnosticism is more of a complementary philosophy, rather than a philosophy on it's own. You see, agnosticism is literally the lack of knowledge about the nature of gods or spirituality. Agnostics don't know if gods exist or not, and most believe we can't know or prove that gods do or don't exist. You don't have to firmly believe gods don't exist to be an atheist, you just have to not believe in gods. In like manner, you do not have to firmly believe gods do exist to be a theist, you just have some sort of belief in an active god. Generally most agnostics do believe, or lack belief, in Gods, even if they may not know it. If you live your life believing that you can't know whether gods do exist, but you really don't have a belief in a God, then you are an agnostic atheist. Conversely, the same can be said of someone who believes that their may be a god, but know they can't prove the god's existence. In short, you either believe in gods, or you don't. Agnosticism is not the middle ground, it is the complement to another philosophy.