Who is to blame for the Financial Crisis and who is best equipped to get us out

@bobmnu (8157)
United States
March 22, 2009 1:19am CST
I am interested to see who you feel is responsible for this current economic crisis and who do you think is best to get us out if it. Please expalin your answer.
2 people like this
8 responses
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
22 Mar 09
I think the FED is to blame, just as they have been to blame for every financial problem since they have been in existence. The FED is who controls the currency, sets the interest rates, controls credit availability, and causes inflation and the devaluation of the dollar. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw End of explanation...
2 people like this
• United States
22 Mar 09
Indeed, the actions of the FED caused much of the problem. Still, I have to lay the blame on voters who reject and even laugh at politicians like Ron Paul who talk about the FED and what really needs to be done. I mean there are always going to be persons around willing to cause financial devestation in order to loot an economy. It is our job to elect responsible leaders who will stop the scoundrels and instead of becoming their partners in crime.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
23 Mar 09
The one thing they have not figured on is that there is ow the internet and people are sharing information. You have Fox New having a report and it is on the internet and around the world within minutes. The information is getting out and you will soon see people reacting with tea parties and letters.
• United States
22 Mar 09
This is true of course. The question is how will the word get out when the mainstream media is spouting propaganda, and all of the voices of reason are silenced by the Fairness Doctrine or regulations that amount to the same thing? They are even targeting the internet for control and taxation. Our elections are manipulated... it is like someone fixing a horse race, or watching a WWF match... it is nothing but show business, with the winner predetermined.
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
24 Mar 09
Free enterprise is the best answer to the problems.. Government caused it, as far as I'm concerned [and human frailty and flaw, showing up as greed in (some) CEO's, etc]. From what I hear government strong armed banks into giving out very risky loans, which springs from the idea of equality for all regardless of efforts. I.e, yes it would be nice is all folks could own a home, but it won't work giving loans to those not able to pay their mortgage.. Also some loans by greed on both sides, where a house is bought but financed into it is all the furniture and a pool, so the loan is now double what the house is worth.. AIG is the insurance company for the banks. So when these bad loans fell through it affected the banks and also AIG. The answer is not more government intervention! Government intervention is what stifles free enterprise. If all wealth is centralized, with the object being to distribute it evenly, motivation and innovation is stifled. [Besides, these govs which collect up the wealth to redistribute, somehow always seem to forget the redistribute part anyway!!] - Our economy would be well on its way to recovery if not for the trillions of dollars of debt being racked up now.. that's tax debt for you and me.. Government seems to want less jobs and more and more dependants upon the system. But once too many get dpendant on the system, there's not many left to support the system/pay taxes! So it never works. More dependants, more votes. Doesn't matter I guess if they destroy the country, which once worked extremely well...
1 person likes this
@tigertang (1749)
• Singapore
17 May 09
I think its a combination of things, though if you had to sum it all up in a few words, I guess you could call it a culture of financial irresponsibility. I mean you had government, which was eager to get the economy growing. You had banks that wanted to look for big profits to pay for outrageous salaries of its top management. You had consumers who were spending more money than they were making. Simply put, the politicians and regulators decided to let the banks "regulate" themselves because they were lazy. The banks needed to grow their market and so invented all sorts of funny instruments to get people who would normally not qualify for loans - borrowing money they could not afford to. The people decided to live beyond their means because, hey credit was cheap and as long as you had a regular job, it was easy to convince the banks to keep the credit line open. So, guess what, all of us got used to living on debt rather than on savings. Of course the rest of the world didn't help either. Instead of persuading Americans to save money instead of get into debt, the world economy thrived on it. I live in Asia, where we've experienced some of the world's fastest economic growth, thanks to the American consumer's inability to save. We make the goods that Americans buy and then we lend them the money to continue buying. Who is going to pull us out of this mess? I don't know but I do give the Obama administration for trying. Yes, governments are pumping money into the system. However, pumping money into the system won't do the trick. Companies will need to go bankrupt - the Detroit Three need to be pruned - GM and Chrysler were making cars that nobody wanted to buy and you can't put them on life support for ever. In the USA, I think you will see allot of people being thrown out of work - but thankfully the USA is a dynamic place where new industries will grow and absorb people from newer industries. In Asia, we will hopefully become less dependent on the USA as a market of last resort and start selling to each other. China will for example have to grow its economy internally because there is simply no American consumer to sustain it. Which is a good thing in that China still needs allot of investment in infrastructure. The same is true of India. Hopefully a growing number of affluent Indians and Chinese will help pick up the slack from the USA and Europe. Allot of factors need to work together if we are to get out of this recession.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
25 Mar 09
The Free Market is the answer and not the problem as some would have us believe.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Mar 09
Ultimately, the blame for the financial crisis must fall on we voters who elected the politicians who could not control governmental spending while we failed to control own. All the talk about a mortgage crisis, financial meltdown, and interest rate debacle is in the final analysis merely distraction from the real issue. Americans have become too soft and undisciplined to do what needs to be done concerning money either in their personal life or in public life.
1 person likes this
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
23 Mar 09
I'm with Red about blaming the voters. So many voted yet weren't informed about the issues. As usual, America looked at the outside of President Obama and didn't take the time to look at the inside of his character or the content of his heart. It didn't take me long to see it. I'm not at all racist, I would have loved to take part in voting for our first black president. But not at the cost of destroying our great nation. We the people are going to have to be the ones to get us out of it. I can't help but think that if all of this were to happen during the next generation than all would probably be lost. I believe things are going to get really bad. That's when people will get back to traditional values and people will once again get involved and informed, and hopefully America can somehow get out of this stronger and better than it's ever been.
1 person likes this
• United States
25 Mar 09
My hubby has a comment he's been making about the voters.. too many, he says are tuned into "american idol" and are not aware of the issues (like socialism vs democracy and free enterprise, and many others)! Not that I have anything against "american idol" but I have to agree with him! There are certainly much more important things to be closely following or at least inform ourselves about. I think so very many people simply accept what the major news outlets say, and some of us realize that so much of this 'news' is actually editorializing! Politics, to me, is resembling peer pressure these days, if you're lib, you're kool, if you're conservative you are ignorant and likely mean! Course that's how it's portrayed by the biased media! And too many of the people are content to let them make the choices! I think a lot of people are very politically unsavvy (don't have a clue as to what's going on!) Yes, let's hope they/we wake up, before it is too late.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
23 Mar 09
While not all will learn from this experience maybe some will and will spend time learning about who they vote for in the future.
1 person likes this
• United States
29 Mar 09
Maybe they should start an "American Idol Politician" show so people can get to know them better before they vote. With all the creative minds in Hollywood and the media, you would think someone could come up with some interesting shows to help educate and spark a bigger interest in what's going on in Washington.
• United States
22 Mar 09
The Federal reserve and the Elite of the world Are to blame for our economic problems (Politicians and political parties are just a guise) and the best equipped to get us out are you and me, and the rest of the citizens of this country, step number one is to pray, step number two, is to buy more american, even buying one item that you usually buy chinese made, and buying american for instead, is a step in the right direction, step number 3, is to start paying more attention to bills that are in the process of becoming laws, and not being afraid to write your state politicians about them, step 4, is to get rid of the CPSIA which limits many small businesses, and step 5 (actually step 5 might actually come before step 3, but this is when I thought of it) pay much closer attention on a state level, because thats where A LOT of the change you want is going to happen. and be prepared to do something about it. and to actually do it.
1 person likes this
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
22 Mar 09
My answer isn't about politicians, a political system, or any other political structure directly. I believe that what really caused this financial crisis is a belief system in this country. The government, love them or hate them, bend to the will of the people. If a Democratic candidate's base is demanding something, then that something is needed to keep voters -- same goes for Republicans, Libertarians, etc. After America conquered segragation, the next step was to include minorities into a proclaimed "white man's world" financially. Even though less than 1% of white people in America were in any position to "hold minorities back," 100% of white people were, ironically and hypocritically, lumped together into one proclaimed "problem." As the years progressed, this "problem," as seen by shortsighted individuals who feel the plight of the few is enough evidence to cause detriment to the many, started to become the "answer" to every new group claiming to be a victim. By the mid '70s values such as strong families, independent responsibility, self-reliance, compentency and qualification to be employed, and a right of the people over the right of a government were all being considered strictly "white" and outdated values; more specifically, a conservative, bigoted view of American. To change this, as many believed, America had to progress and transform itself into a country that catered to its citizens, rather than being a country that provided a platform for its citizens to achieve on their own merit. Now instead of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" being taught, you had millions of people believing that the government - the white, evil, bigoted government - owed them a living. Henceforth, separatism was glorifed, so long as it wasn't white separatism. Single mothers were glorified, so long as they weren't white-trash. Violence against America was glorified, so long as it wasn't coming from white police and protectors. America, in only a few short years, transformed into a safe haven for millions upon millions of "victims" of these 100% white oppressors. So, already changing due to Kennedy's martydom, Carter expanded and he and his administration bent closer to the will of the people. Now, no longer did the individual have to feel as if he or she had to work. As soon as they gave their heart-melting story of victimhood, tax dollars from the 100% white devils would be pooled into a pot and distributed on a worst-off, more-served basis. From this stemmed groups that pressured the 100% white devils into making loans, giving credit, paying more taxes, and turing a blind eye to unqualified individuals to do anything but mooch. From there, the snowball effect took over. The floodgates were open. Democracy was no longer about the land of the free, home of the brave, and the place where hard work pays off. It was about the loudest beggars being served. As such, every politician began catering to the outreached hands. No matter what side it was, personal responsibility gave way to a welfare mindset. Greedy individuals then were able to sneak in under the radar and exploit our government's willingness to cater to everyone. And now that the damage is done some people continue to blame well-to-do people - like the employees of AIG who received bonuses - instead of taking responsibility for their progressive liberal ideology causing calamity in America. The mindsets of people stuck at opposite poles - either a beggar or a greed-stricken a-hole - caused this financial crisis. While it was happening, unfortunately, this country still had other problems to deal with: Education, terror, and infinite other day-to-day things that threaten to rip loose the fabric of American culture. But I don't blame the greedy so much as those dependant on government. Without the distractions caused by these "victims," the greed would have been noticed decades ago and snuffed out! And ironically, we're now becoming a victim-catering society all together with this new administration! Personal self-worth has been replaced by high-chairs and binkys.
1 person likes this
@tea512 (687)
• United States
22 Mar 09
i think congress is to blame they are supposed to have oversight over, banking, housing, SEC and the Federal Reserve. They spent more time worrying about steroids then they did any of these important issues that have crippled our economy.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
23 Mar 09
Have you noticed that Congress is spending a lot of time talking about the "Bonus" and very little time looking into what caused the crisis? I think they know but want the public to focus on everything else but the answer.
1 person likes this
@agmamayo (804)
• Philippines
22 Mar 09
Hello Bob, Thanks for responding on my Obama discussion,I appreciate it. About the financial crisis, well we don't need to blame a president for it, instead blame the financial and banking sectors of the country. They are the ones who created this mess, mismanagement, over spending to personal bonuses of CEO's, and misinvestments. Like the issue on the company AIG, having so many sums of money given as cash incentives to employees specially to high ranking executive in the company despite the financial situation of the country. These crisis needs the help of so many sectors to work hand in hand and cannot be addressed by a president alone. The president is just a person to lead all sectors of the economy to the right direction, and he needs us the people to work hand in hand with him. We the people have the responsibility to crosscut as much as possible, budget wisely and be a loaw abiding citizen, in dire crisis anarchy and anger rises, so we need to calm down, compose ourselves and face the crisis, not argue this and that.