Do you prefer paper or a machine?

United States
July 20, 2009 3:27pm CST
So, Sony was the first with their Ebook and Amazon has the Kindle and there is probably others out there that few know about cause they just don't get the attention. Anyway what do you prefer? Would you prefer to have your books soley on a little machine? Whould you prefer to solely have paper books or do you think they both have their place and neither one should go anywhere? Do you own any type of ebook or plan to buy one? If so which Sony or Amazon, etc.?
2 people like this
16 responses
@machizmo (279)
• United States
20 Jul 09
I like e books and electronic book but I do not ever want to not have paper books. For the simple fact that till there is good back up of books you have or buy, they can be lost alot easier than paper or hard back books can.
1 person likes this
• United States
21 Jul 09
Yeah, I feel the same. I hope they both always stay around though. Thanks for taking the time to respond!
@ShepherdSpy (8544)
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
20 Jul 09
In this round of such gadgets on the market,Sony may have been first..A few years ago,I own(ed) one of the Original Franklin eBooknan devices,a PDA type ebook reader.When it worked,it was great,but some units (including mine) were flawed by a battery problem which when they ran out,it wasn't possible to change them out without losing the content stored in memory,so with a battery life of only a few days,less when using the built in backlight,the portability of the device was an issue..some of these with the fix are still available..The great thing about ebook readers is,if you love reading,and you travel,you have the ability to bring a library worth of books wherever you go,and depending on the ebook format used are readily available online (and even free!) Good though the kindle is,for Me it's a bit expensive yet-I'll stick with the free reader and downloads I can get on my cellphone for now...
• United States
20 Jul 09
I had a Franklin bookman device but mine wasn't meant as an ereader. Mine was a thesarus that took ebook cartridges to do all kinds of different things. It was pretty neat. I did/do have a CliƩ that has an ebook reader on it. I use to really like it. I wouldn't want it as my sole source of book reading, but I really enjoyed being able to store books and have all the PDA features too. I wish Sony still made the CliƩ I liked it. Yeah, I agree. They just lowered the price of the Kindle, but it is still pricey. I think ebooks are WAY too expensive. They are about the price of real books. If I am going to pay $10, $20 or more I want a real live book in my hand. It cost them next to nothing to make an ebook so the price should reflect that. Thanks for responding!
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
20 Jul 09
I'd recommend www.gutenberg.org and www.booksinmyphone.com for some free ebooks
• United States
21 Jul 09
Oooh, thank you! I like free! It's the price I can afford Thanks!
@Pigglies (9329)
• United States
21 Jul 09
I prefer books that are on the computer because then the computer can read them to me. If the Kindle would read to me, I would buy it.
@Pigglies (9329)
• United States
21 Jul 09
Oh I will have to look for her post then. I didn't know the Kindle did that. Last time I checked on it, it wouldn't even read audiobooks, much less have a text to speech feature on it. But I know they came out with a new one. I hope the voices are good and the speed can be changed and such. That would be awesome.
• United States
21 Jul 09
There is actually someone who responded to this post and said she had bad eyesight and she has a Kindle and it reads to her. You might want to look into that if you want a Kindle. I thought that feature seemed pretty neat :o).
@Fishmomma (11377)
• United States
21 Jul 09
I have a kindle, which was purchased as my sight is bad. It reads to me when my eyes are tired, so I can complete an entire book easily. I do read hardcovers and a few paperback with a magnifying sheet.
@Pigglies (9329)
• United States
21 Jul 09
I didn't know there was an audio reading feature. I am unable to read without computer assistance generally. Can you tell me if the voices are good on the Kindle? Is the reading speed adjustable? Have you ever tried Kurzweil, and if so, is the Kindle reading software comparable? I cannot read paperbacks anymore. But I can read textbooks with a sheet and a magnifying handheld thing. Generally even textbooks I try my hardest to get them on the computer instead though, otherwise I won't really be able to read very much of them. I also force my friends to read for me a lot.
@Fishmomma (11377)
• United States
21 Jul 09
It is adjustable and I even take my kindle when I go walking to enjoy a book on the walk. I highly recommend the kindle. Sorry haven't tried anything else, so no opinion on other devices.
• United States
21 Jul 09
That is nice. I didn't know that it has the audio reading feature, that is nice. Screens bother my eyes more than books do, so I prefer books, but having an audio option would be nice.
@zed_k4 (17589)
• Singapore
21 Jul 09
I've heard of Amazon Kindle and was quite surprised to see that it is getting lots of fans too. Reading electronically like that is rather new to me, but if you are saying like anywhere at all on the net, I like it that way. It's been awhile since I've read a book and I've been reading blogs, articles and basically any information that I managed to get while surfing the net. I like diverse knowledge like that, right up to certain specifics which I'm looking for. An E-book sounds cool and I might check out Sony soon..
@zed_k4 (17589)
• Singapore
21 Jul 09
Wow.. that is really so cool. It would be awesome to have technology that is as close to the paper as possible. You are right, reading from the computer screen can make one's eyes very tired indeed..
• United States
21 Jul 09
I think that is part of the reason I like real books over ebook readers. I read so much stuff online that at the end of the day I don't want to read anymore on any kind of screen and paper feels so much better on my eyes. I hear the Sony one is pretty nice. It is suppose to have some kind of technology that makes to pages look more like real paper, so it is easier on the eyes.
1 person likes this
@zhuhuifen46 (3483)
• China
21 Jul 09
I prefer paper mostly because I like the feel. The E stuff is available everywhere, but my eyes fail me. I want to read for a longer time.
@Pigglies (9329)
• United States
21 Jul 09
Your eyes don't hurt on paper too? I can only read for 5 minutes at a time on paper, especially if it is white paper.
• China
21 Jul 09
The difference might lie with the radiance. With books, I can read the big character ones.
• United States
21 Jul 09
Reading on screens bother my eyes too. I can read a lot longer with a paper book. Supposedly the Sony Reader is suppose to view like real paper, but I don't know if it really does.
@imsilver (1665)
• Canada
21 Jul 09
I find that if I try to read a whole book on a computer; I end up with tired eyes and a headache. I've never read one on a smaller machine. I'm imagining that it would be even more straining. I love to read. There is nothing more relaxing than taking your favorite book into a nice hot bubble bath and getting to read in peace and quiet for a bit. I'd definatly take a paper book over a machine anyday.
• United States
22 Jul 09
I am the exact same way. Reading on the computer too much bothers my eyes. I like reading in a nice bubble bath too. You wouldn't want to drob an ebook reader in the tub. That would be one expensive bath :o).
@blueunicorn (2401)
• United States
20 Jul 09
I tried the book machines, but I just didn't care for them. The one I tried was on my iPod. I enjoy having a "real" book to touch and carry. My eyes hurt too much when I was reading on my iPod. I did like that I could carry a book with me in such a small form, but the novelty of that wore off after awhile. Also, it is really hard to find free book content on the machines. I read like crazy, and I am a cheapskate. I generally buy my books at garage sales for $.25, so that is another benefit to the paper books.
• United States
21 Jul 09
I love finding good books at garage sales. I am a cheapskate too. A long time ago I found all kinds of great books for sale at the library for 10 cents. My eyes bother me a lot too when I have to read on a screen. So, I much prefer a book.
1 person likes this
• United States
23 Jul 09
10 cents per book? That's a great deal! I wish I would come across that. Happy shopping!
@chivann (138)
• Cambodia
21 Jul 09
I like papaer more than machine. But sometimes you know my country doesnt have such papper book up-to-date in the store. So i decided to read E-book instead. Feel free to drop by at my free games site: www.game4pal.com
• United States
22 Jul 09
That is great that you at least have the option of ebooks even if you don't have up-to-date paper ones.
• United States
21 Jul 09
Each of them have their own pros and cons. I'm not a big fan at reading text book, but I like reading manga (japanese comic) very much. I actually prefer reading manga paper books, but I rarely read them now, I read them online because they are updated much faster than the paper books.
• United States
22 Jul 09
I agree too that they each have their own pros and cons. Thank you for taking the time to respond!
• China
21 Jul 09
I think each of them has their special functions and can not substitute each other.
• United States
21 Jul 09
I completely agree .
@rlaknar (616)
• India
21 Jul 09
I prefer paper reading.Reading habit is a god one but reading in electronic format is so much hard.
• United States
22 Jul 09
I prefer paper too and I too think it is harder to read on electronic ones. Thanks for taking the time to respond!
@kenraku (241)
• Australia
21 Jul 09
I think both have their own advantages, but I prefer e-book more. I can store as much as I can without spending any space. I can download free ebook on the internet. I can search throught the ebook to find specific information. It can be carried out easily. It won't be broken or being old. I can do backup to avoid other problems. It can be shared with different friends. More and more.
• United States
22 Jul 09
Yes those are great advantages. I do like that some allow you to do a word search so you can find something quick.
@Nic7389 (186)
21 Jul 09
for fiction or entertainment books definitely paper, but instruction manuals are much better on your pc
• United States
22 Jul 09
That is interesting, because for me I still prefer instructions and such on paper. I think because it is easier to take whereever throughout the house. I have a small laptop, but light paper is just easier for me and I don't have to make sure my computer is on to access it. Thanks!
@ra1787 (501)
• Italy
20 Jul 09
I definetely prefer having paper books, i like the sensation of turning the pages, feeling the paper, putting it back on the shelf, ebooks are too cold, and fruthermore i think they are much less durable, i have books that have more the 100 years in my house and sometimes i read them, digital books are likely to be lost in some hard drive failure, and we never have full control over them, it is recent news that amazon had to delete some orwell's book because they didn't had the copyright to sell it in the first place, so some people one day found the book canceled from their device and the money refunded. In this case this is not a huge problem, it was just a copyright problem of amazon, but the thing is that it is not a good thing that they have all this power. Who knows if someday when a book is considered against some powerful entity, they will simply delete it and no one can recover it. Paper books surely cost a little bit more, but they are definetely worth it, and even if we don't want to pay the extra public libraries are always free!
• United States
20 Jul 09
I am glad someone feels the way I do. I too prefer paper. I am not a big fan of killing trees, but if they ever disappeared it would be a sad, sad world. I think ereaders are only good for traveling. I think it is great to take hundreds of books with you without the weight. But, other than that 99% of the time I want a nice paper book with real live pages. I heard about that Amazon deleting the Orwell book. How ironic that it was his book out of any. Amazon said that that would never happen again even if the same issue arised. The thing is that is flat out stealing. It is equivalent to going into your home and stealing a book you bought. The only difference is, it is easier. But, either way deleting that book was stealing. I agree. There is so manythings that can go wrong, machine failure, etc. where paper books can last for a very long time.
• United States
20 Jul 09
You ask this and I can't help but think of Fahrenheit 451, even more so after I saw the first response. As for the question itself. I haven't used one of the devices, though I've seen what they can do, but I don't have much of a desire to have one and especially not with the price as high as it is. I have a laptop that I can use like that and I also have the option to write, I need the ability to do both really. When I pack to go some where it's always at least two books and two notebooks and if it's a long trip it's the two books and the laptop, which gives me more books, plus my documents. Which I think leads me to another reason why I don't want an eReader, I'm not certain if you can back up all your books, I'd be extremely distraught if something happened to all my books. I already learned the lesson of having something like five backups for my electronic documents. The price of the ebooks is another thing as well. I haunt Half-Price bookstores, and their clearance section, so paying that much for each book would be very painful.
• United States
21 Jul 09
I heard that you can't really back up ebooks yet, so that is a big downfall, unless companies allow you to re-download something you already bought. I know some companies do that with software. I think ebook prices are insanely high. They are almost the same cost of a new book. That's crazy. I also love finding discount books too, not easy to find a clearance rack or yard sale with discount ebooks :o).