Would you work somewhere for free if it meant forgiving all your debt?

@mommyboo (13174)
United States
July 23, 2009 10:44am CST
This just occurred to me! If you had an opportunity to get rid of all your debt - and this could be anything, maybe except for something longterm investment type like a mortgage - would you work somewhere for free for a certain period of time in order to have the debt totally forgiven? I think I would. Of course it would depend what it was I'd be doing and how many hours a week I'd have to trade in, but I think it would be an excellent idea. If enough people did this, maybe we could return back at least for awhile to a society who actually did things for others without demanding payment up front and stiffing people who could not make that up front payment. Most people have SOME debt, even if it's just a loan of some type or a credit card, or a car payment. Can you imagine if everybody did that for awhile? It would be super nice. I mean sure, I'd go in to an office daily for a few hours and do some stuff, or maybe make coffee, or serve people lunch, or attack insurance companies lol. If other people were doing their jobs for free too though, I could go and get a manicure or a massage free too lol. Of course I am a big advocate of everybody in government working for free, I don't believe any of them deserve any sort of salary or compensation until THE PUBLIC can see that they are handling things the way WE want them to handle them. I mean it is OUR money that is paying their salaries so until they are proven, they don't deserve any.
3 people like this
7 responses
• United States
24 Jul 09
that makes me think of those people that work at a place and live on the property so they get their home in exchange of doing security or maintenance etc.. i think its a great idea but i would still think you wouldnt have enough money for utilities and etc.. but like maybe a part time thing or something would be cool
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Jul 09
They do get a small salary, I know what you're talking about - like an apartment manager who lives on the property? They don't have to pay for their apartment and I think their water/trash is free also but they still have to pay electric, phone, and food, etc. I don't know how it works now, one of my friends did it back in the day. She couldn't keep doing it though, it was HER job. Her husband worked also and he commuted, and they had a little kid, so after one too many times of her beeper going off for apartment related sh*t when she wasn't supposed to be on call and having to call the police and handle some things that were pretty nasty (all while not technically within her 'work hours'), she decided to give up free rent and utilities for peace of mind and no beeper going off all hours of the night!
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Jul 09
I think they were doing it with the intention of saving for a downpayment on a house but as far as I know, that never happened before they divorced lol.
@arkaf61 (10881)
• Canada
24 Jul 09
Ah... I know what you mean. And certainly I would be glad to do that if it was offered to me, providing that it could be done around my work hours, since I would still need to get paid from somewhere. It's funny you mentioned that, because some times, when I wonder what I would do if I ever won a big lottery or something, I dream of being able to create some sort of ... well something LOL DOn't know what I would be able to call it. But the idea would be to help some of the people like me - that are in the middle class bracket, which nowadays is basically worse than being poor - that would like to have a house. The way I wanted to do it, would be to actually buy the house, and offer to people who met the requirements the option to, let's call it "rent" it at a reasonable monthly rent/payment/ whatever; not charity but also not the incredible high fees and interests a bank charges. And then if the person was ever in the financial position to be able to at least try to buy the house, allow the payments made so far, to be able to enter the equation in some form. Not necessarily 100% but something reasonable. But concurrently with that, have some sort of agreement that the people would do something for free in return for that. Could be anything of course, but maybe a few hours a week working in the restoring of another house, or doing the clean up part, or providing some babysitting so others could contribute as well..something along these lines. I think that it would be able to help people in a bracket where hardly any help is available. Because nowadays - at least in here - the ones that are considered poor have plenty of help, the rich have many ways to escape paying what they should, and the ones in the middle are just left to fend for themselves with basically no help at all and often shouldering the costs of the other two. I know I have not really explained this in a clear way, but I just remembered it as I was writing :)
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
26 Jul 09
You made sense! I wish this were possible too because i am tired of the people at the bottom getting stuff for free that they don't DESERVE and people at the top again getting stuff practically for free that they don't deserve either. I have never understood how those at the bottom should get anything they don't earn, yet those of us in the middle get told 'you make too much, you have too much, you don't need any help, you've proven you're capable'. Hmph well, even if that's true, it doesn't mean we don't need help when tuition costs a hundred thousand and we don't get any financial breaks on ANYTHING from housing to utilities lol. Anyway, it's not even that we want a handout or anything, just some reward for the work we consistently put in. I wouldn't feel that way if people were getting something for nothing so often but at the same time *I* always get told 'YOU can't have something for nothing'. That's the hugest double standard I have ever heard!
1 person likes this
@34momma (13882)
• United States
23 Jul 09
that would only depend on what my debt was. i personally don't have any debt thank you Lord. but if i had a large debt and i had to only work for a year or maybe two. i would do it. i am not going to sell my soul to get rid of it. i mean doing things that i would not do even if i were to get paid for it.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Jul 09
Oh NO, nothing like that LOL! There was an quiz on facebook about 'how cheap you'd sell out' or something and apparently I'm not cheap. I would only do something that I'd do anyway - but I'd do it in exchange for getting rid of a bill or something instead of getting a paycheck. I would say also that once I started working, whatever bill it was no longer had the right to call me 2 days before it was due and remind me to pay it. LMAO!
@4mymak (1793)
• Malaysia
24 Jul 09
let's see now.. i could see that as an option, but i dont think it would work for me..since i am already working 8-10 hours per day now.. i would rather spend my weekends with my family, and catch up on my housework.. and i dont think i want to skip my current job, and miss some payments (salary) in order for me to pay back my loan.. i would rather work around my monthly salary to pay for whatever i borrowed... but i surely enjoyed your comments about the 'government servants'.. they're the same all over the world, arent they - dont you find it amusing how almost anyone from any country would make similar comments about their government staff/ people working for the 'public service'.. they may get relatively lower monthly income than people working in the private sector, but they certainly enjoy a lot of 'perks' - very minimal loan rates for anything, shorter 'official' working hours (during which they dont do much also), they even get year-end bonus in this country, they have no worries of losing their jobs.. and they've also got a very strong 'workers-union' - and on top of that.. the government really 'takes care' of 'these people' because they want to 'secure their votes' everytime election comes!..
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
23 Jul 09
yes but how am I going to pay the mortgage then?
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Jul 09
I'm not talking about a full time 'work for free' deal, and I suppose it wouldn't work for someone who is supporting a family all by themselves unless it were just a part time thing. I would do it because currently I don't go out and get a big income. However, I'm sure it would work still.... it would just take longer to pay down the other debt.
• United States
23 Jul 09
i have less than $4,000 in debt so i would not do this but it would be a good idea for people who have a lot more debt.
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Jul 09
Keep in mind it might be very few hours and not take long... less than a year? Depending on your levels of expertise in different areas or what someone needed help with that would erase it. I was figuring this would be more like a trade for services almost - so what you did for 'free' would be something you liked doing or had knowledge in already, potentially both - so not only would you get satisfaction out of it, the people who didn't have to pay you for the services would be blessed lol.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
26 Jul 09
Love the concept, but unfortunately I don't think this would work with businesses because of that greed factor. They want the money and won't settle for anything less. Even those who send in what they can afford in earnest are still badgered by the companies they owe money to. On a personal level I've done something similar. When a friend needed someone to clean her house I had her pay me by ordering some pans I wanted. I really wish companies were open to this concept. I just don't see it ever happening.