Does your philosophy of life determine who you support for your leaders?

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
February 24, 2010 9:29pm CST
Just curious, we have so many differing opinions in America about how to run the country. I was wondering if you have a set system for choosing our leaders or if you just go by looks, ads and blogs. etc.? If you vote straight party ticket, is your choice of party platform based on your philosophy, religion, values and ethics? If you vote for each candidate by what he or she says and promises, do you have a way of deciding if they're telling the truth. Do you do any research? Listen to debates? Or take someone's word for it? So many say that religion has nothing to do with politics. And we are all getting a clear message from our leaders that ethics really has nothing to do with good leadership (so they say). So where does that leave us in trying to choose? I was so disappointed in our last national election...which in my humble opinion was based on hype and PR and not on who would be the best leader. I'd like to know HOW Americans really choose the candidates they elect. What do most people base their vote on?
3 people like this
8 responses
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
25 Feb 10
ALL our elections that I ever remember were based on hype and PR and not on who would be the best leader. I choose based on the issues. Usually I end up voting for the person who has the most number of issues in alignment with what I believe. But sometimes there is a show stopper issue where I absolutely won't vote for somebody because of there position on it even though we are mostly aligned on the others. How have you been?
1 person likes this
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
26 Feb 10
Stress with Dearra and one thing and another, but things are basically OK...
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Mar 10
Let me guess, puberty?
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
26 Feb 10
I try to do the same thing Dawn, there is no way that one candidate lines up 100% with me, lol. I have been doing good. I like where I work and I am slowly getting caught up with things. Plan on some summer courses at the college. If I can convince my employer to let me work only weekends will take a full course load. (not likely) Kids are doing good, my youngest grandson just turned one. Remember my blog on his birth? My health is not so good, blood sugars are way to high. But now that I can afford my supplements again, I will get them back under control. How are things with you?
2 people like this
• United States
27 Feb 10
Deb, I haven't heard from you in so long! So glad to see you again! I was off the computer for a while because of pneumonia and complications, but I'm glad to be back! I decide on a candidate according to my personal beliefs and philosophy. I don't stick with a particular party or group, and I couldn't be less interested in how they look or any of that. If they are for those things I think they should be in favor of and against those I think are wrong, they get my vote! Joanne
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Mar 10
I was away too, first unemployment and then lightening struck my house and took out my computer. I'm back to work, but using computer at work. Bills come before a new computer! Sorry to hear you were sick. Hope all is well now? Did you have to go to the hospital? I'm glad you're back too! I too, base my choices on my personal beliefs and philosophies. I am just confused as to why we are so afraid to admit this very common occurance? Most people do vote according to conscience, don't they? Yet we're told it is NOT a good thing to do. How else DO you choose, is my question to those who insist on keeping 'religion' out of politics. In my mind, any belief system or philosophy is the SAME as a religion, isn't it?
@DavidReedy (2378)
• United States
28 Feb 10
Very good grouping of questions. Perhaps a little biased (in ways that I approve of, but still...)... The truth is, most people are idiots--concerning that almost all of the population voted for Obama or McCain, slight majority Obama... These men are both liars, corporate owned, CFR members&associates, etc. I, for one, did my homework, found that I really dug what Ron Paul (R) stood for, and found that I could tolerate what Dennis Kucinich (D) stood for--but these darkhorses represented not the established parties, but rather the people, the Constitution, and good old fashioned principles. I research my candidates now, and it took the last two elections to teach me how. Most Americans are stupid. Obama got the black vote solely because he's black and because white "liberals" are self-hating morons, he got the Jewish vote because he's an APAC stooge, and he got the vote for so many young and naive because Bush and McCain were OBVIOUSLY evil people. The people are duped and stupid and there's no way 'round it. DR...
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Mar 10
lol...thanks David, how ya been? I too, liked Ron Paul. We need to ditch the two party system. As for the liberals being self hating, I disagree. They're really (as a party) pretty proud of themselves. I read a book by Ann Coulter that listed all the hate and slander that they have endorsed against the very constituents they claim to be so concerned about. If you look at the voting history, you'll see they're not that loving OR concerned about blacks, women, minorities, gays, or children. They're just good liars! As for Bush and McCain being evil...I'll reserve judgment. I have a hard time calling anyone evil, unless they're a serial killer or child molester. As far as I know, neither one is. I will say that I do think Bush suffered some slandering from the far left...and that some of what he did was good for the country. Notice, I said SOME. Of course, that might be said of any politician. I prefer to look forward, and choose very wisely next go round.
• Philippines
13 Mar 10
Hello debrakcarey ;) Philippine elections is also near, two months from now we are going to cast our votes for the next president. Honestly until now, I'm still undecided between my two bets about who should be the ONLY one to vote. The first candidate I like is good in his principles, and you can really see he has a lot of integrity in him because among all the other candidates, he is the only one to confidently say he's not a corrupt politician because his parents are both known as faithful politicians here in my country. The other candidate however is firm in his decisions, has a ironhand and has done many significant changes and improvements in his past leaderships. If he'll be the next president, no doubt that there will also be significant improvements here in my country. The two are my bets, so it's a matter of PRINCIPLES vs REALITY. I value my principles so much, but I'm also impressed with what I see realistically in the second president. I guess to choose the right candidate, we should not just look on our own perspectives but on the reality as well. Though I'm still undecided, 80% of me says it should be my second bet for president ;D
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 10
Thanks for responding cecillecarmela, I admire that you vote according to your principles while also keeping your mind on reality. So many feel that their reality, what they live by, must be imposed on everyone. In our day and age I can admire the morals and principles of others, but what impresses me most is people realizing that not every one has the same opinion on what is right. I am a conservative Christian, I don't demand everyone live by my beliefs. But I SURE do not want someone telling me I must live by their beliefs either. What I feel is happening in my country is that the liberal left has imposed their belief system on American's for a long time and we are beginning to see a conservative groundswell, even amongst the democrats (liberals) living in our country. People all over America are tired of the radical left telling them what is politically correct and what they should be thinking or feeling about the issues. Along with that, I see conservatives reject the status quo in their own party. I think finally, Americans are starting to reject the media and their political parties telling them who to vote for. This is a great thing as far as I am concerned.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
28 Feb 10
I don't vote on a person's looks or personality. In fact, I would endorse a system where we don't directly see a candidate or hear them speak. That would take personality out of it and also save a lot of campaign money. I READ. I read their campaign literature then I go out and research them on the internet, talk to other people, find out their history and skeletons, etc. If they are already in office, I'll vote for their challenger because I do not believe in more than one term in office. The only exception is if the challenger is just too bizarre and out there and that's only happened once--in this last presidential election! Didn't do me any good, though, because the master hypnotized enough of his audience to get the votes.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
3 Mar 10
Thank you for telling me about this article, it validates what I have been thinking for quite some time. They are controlling us and we're letting them. I'm glad you introduced me to this columnist, I'll be reading more of his thoughts!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
4 Mar 10
I'm glad you could find it. I live in an area that is very open to the Tea Party movement. Even 'old' democrats are voicing their disgust with how things are turning. Our paper is 'liberal' but the editor is getting pretty vocal about the mess this country is in since November 2008.
@jlamela (4898)
• Philippines
4 Mar 10
Personally I choose a candidate whom I shared with the same advocacies. I want somebody who have the burning passion to uphold the freedom and democracy ideologies who does not corrupt and who aims for the best for every citizen.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
13 Mar 10
Sounds wonderful, how do you know that they're not lying to you and everyone else when they promise these things?
@urbandekay (18278)
25 Feb 10
Certainly, I am guided by compassion. all the best urban
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
26 Feb 10
It is always good to be guided by compassion. I admire that. I strive for it myself when possible. Sometimes, I'm much to nice to those who are NOT compassionate. lol May I remind you, if you have raised kids; you may realize that sometimes there has to be such a thing as 'tough love'. I'd always try and allow my kids to experience the consequences of their choices if I could. I wanted them to learn that the world was not always a compassionate place. Why I felt the need to say all that I really don't know. Your response was excellent!
• United States
25 Feb 10
Years ago I heard that in every election there is one side taht wants to open your eyes to reality around you - that offers hope and then another side that wants you to close your eyes or harden your heart. And to always go with the side that fosters hope.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
25 Feb 10
That sounds like a good plan. But how do you know if it is hope that is attainable or false hope? Do you research the past track record of the person offering hope?
1 person likes this