More Aid from the US

@laglen (19759)
United States
March 28, 2011 6:59am CST
North Korea is having a rough year. (who isnt?) Senator John Kerry wants the US to send 430,000 metric tons of food to aid them. We cut off this aid in 2009 because North Korea ordered the US out. It has been proven that North Korea will just let their people starve. Now I ask you, in light of everybody screaming that the US should be taking care of their own country right now, should we send the food? Should we get involved where the government does not want us but the people need us? Remember - we cant be the World Police, but we also cant be the World Nanny.
4 people like this
10 responses
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 Mar 11
It is the North Koren government that is bad mouthing us and threatening us, and I bet the leaders EAT fine. This is a hard one for me to judge. Cause I know the N. Korean people are just that, people caught in a bad bad situation with a government who severely oppresses them. I'd send the food, but what then? The leaders eat it all and the people still starve. Or if by some slim chance the people DO get the food, how long until it runs out? Unfortunately, the way I see it, private ministries and charities should do what they can to get some relief to the south Koreans and the US government stay out of it. BTW...where's the UN? why isn't it doing something?
2 people like this
• United States
28 Mar 11
I saw a speech by the head of the UN a few months ago saying that we had to make sure that everyone in the world got their "fair share" of food. For the life of me, I couldn't figure out who was going to figure out what was a "fair share" and who was going to decide that. But it surely seemed like he already thinks we have a one world government and that we're not spreading the wealth enough.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
That is the goal. UN, new world order, world court, world court, world food bank...
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
29 Mar 11
I was being sarcastic. They want to be the arbitors of peace and love, don't they? And while I'm at it, being sarcastic that is.... We just bombed the h*ll out of a country for human rights violations....didn't we? Where's the world's concern for getting some help for THESE PEOPLE? I just can't stand hypocrisy in high places.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
28 Mar 11
That aid will not go to the people. The government will grab it. If one has to help the North Koreans, it would have to be the churches who of course will send people and missionaries there to see that the food goes to the right people. Giving food indiscriminately does not work.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
Good point and great idea!
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
2 Apr 11
I agree and unfortunately, it is the people that we are trying to help that suffer the most. Damn government
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
2 Apr 11
I am thinking of what happened and is still happening in Haiti and that is from a friendly nation. There is so much corruption in the government and the people there are taken advantage of, that what aid is given does not go to the people. And also they feel entitled. And when the government owns everything that is even worse.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Mar 11
oh.hell.no. at the risk of sounding harsh-they've been threatening us for how long lately? they should have thought of that.you never know who will actually get the food. japan,i'll send to. we have people in my town that are hungry also.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
I agree. The problem is, their government doesnt care.
@LaurenInLA (2270)
• United States
28 Mar 11
First, North Korea is still out of control and I cannot understand why we would want to send aid to a country that still rants and raves about nuclear weapons and takes pot shots at South Korea. Secondly, it quite frankly annoys me that we would send food to another country when we have people in this country that are suffering. I live in a relatively affluent area and can you imagine my surpise when I learned that a food bank was set up at our community center? People in the U.S. have lost their homes, their jobs and many are homeless and hungry. We've got the money to send food to a country whose leader barks about obliterating us but we can't feed and house our own citizens. Something is very wrong with this picture.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
very good point! OUr food bank has been running on empty
• United States
28 Mar 11
You're right. The food banks here have given out 2 and 3 times what they've given out in past years. There are so many who don't qualify for food stamps, but can hardly cover their bills.
1 person likes this
@Outcast (632)
• United States
28 Mar 11
I think we need to worry about our own country before we help anyone elses. It just upsets me when I see a country bad mouth the USA then the first sign of them being in trouble the USA is the first ones they yell help to. There are so many people here in this country that go hungry, homeless, it is bad. Take care of America before anywhere else.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
I understand that point of view.
@veganbliss (3895)
• Adelaide, Australia
28 Mar 11
I have an idea... hope you will like it Why not ask them to send the starving people to the USA or even Australia & feed them there? They will be some of the best, hard-working citizens that anyone has ever seen. Politically, it seems to be a double-standard; they want you out, but still want your help. It's really tricky dealing with some countries. Similar debates & responses are going on over here. The people say we should be helping our own people first, the government says we have enough to do both at the same time. Hopefully the leaders of the countries involved, or the foreign diplomats, can talk & negotiate & come to some sort of arrangement over this issue that is becoming common for many countries all over the world.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
The problem is North Korea itself. Like you said, they want you out but then want your help.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
That would make for interesting reading
• Adelaide, Australia
29 Mar 11
You're probably right. Just in case, I'd like permission to read the complete discussion between foreign diplomats from both countries & then make my mind up. Sometimes things just can't be worked out or one or both parties refuse to spend any real time to discuss the issues & work out what can & cannot be done in some sort of ongoing negotiation process. There are a great many lives at risk here, but as you said, North Korea don't care about that.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Mar 11
I would have to agree with what it seemed everyone else said. We have people here in the United States who are without jobs, well below the poverty level, & even homeless. that food should really go to those people who are here trying to make it, but just having trouble. I have a feeling that there might be a reasoning for wanting to send food to aid them. One is that Senator Kerry has this notion that aid from the United States might make the government of North Korea grateful enough to give in to at least some of the demands of the United States, such as giving up trying to become a nuclear capable nation. Even if the food aid is sent, I don't think it would sway the North Korean government much, if at all. At the same time, Senator Kerry probably feels that the people of North Korea are just trying to live their lives & take care of their families. It's not completely their fault that they have such a government. He is probably right about that. At the same time, American people are also in the same situation. They should really be first priority, not some country trying to build nuclear ballistic missiles that can reach the United States & who do not want Americans near them.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
you are probably right. And chances are, that food would never reach the people who really need it.
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
29 Mar 11
The problem is that we never learn. These oppressive governments never cared about the living conditions of their people and never will. We give billions in aid, a lot of which never makes it to those who are actually suffering but rather into the hands of the ruling class who turn a tidy profit and live very well indeed. You know the old saying, give a man a fish and he eats for a day, give the government a bucket of fish and everyone starves equally. That's the beauty of Marxism/Communism/Stalinism or whatever label they decide to stick on their leader's lapels. It's not even about what we can afford or what we can't afford. It isn't about a moral imperative, either. It's about how to be good stewards of the bounty we have enjoyed in this country for so long. Heart before head has led to a lot of wasted money and unfulfilled promises. Yes, the American conscience leads us to do generous but often foolhardy things that sometimes can assist the repressive government to continue to repress and avoid political change that might effect a better future for the citizens. We can't blame ourselves for our generous nature, but we should hold our leaders accountable for how they administrate what we give them. It's probably time to stop feeding our enemies and starving our friends, both with aid and with other kinds of support - economic support, military support, etc. Let's put our dollars where they can work for us to secure a safer world and our national interests.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
well said and you are absolutely right, it just makes their government richer and doesnt help the people actually starving. I can see this happening in North Korea. I would be more apt to help Japan as all aid sent there so far has gone to people. But I do agree that we need to use our heads and not our hearts.
@katsmeow1213 (28717)
• United States
28 Mar 11
Since I was a child I've always believed we should take care of ourselves first. Our country is already in debt and there are people starving right here at home. If we were in better shape of course I'd be all for helping other nations.. but why can't we make our own problems a priority?
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
I agree, we are in too much of a mess as it is.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
31 Mar 11
I agree Debrah, it is their government to ours. However, any assistance we may send would go straight to lil kims coffers.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
30 Mar 11
My mother always offered food to visitors to our home. Even if it was the last goodie in the cabinet, or even if there were only enough servings for the family at a meal. She taught me that God will provide if we are not stingy. The mind set that we should only take care of our own bothers me for that reason. I do understand where it is coming from but it bothers me. We have to remember that it is NOT the people of N. Korea that h*te us and want to kill us, it is their government. If we don't remember this, we cannot be upset when those who do not like us around the world spew their hatred at us as individuals. It is our government that they should not be happy with, and we get the flak. See what I mean?
1 person likes this
@mattic (282)
• United States
29 Mar 11
This is not a Constitutional function of our government and is tantamount to treason. We should end all foreign aid and allow other sovereign nations to fend for themselves. If individual US citizens want to help, that is their right.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
29 Mar 11
well said and I couldnt agree more.