What decides how bad an earthquake is?

By MysD
@mysdianait (66009)
Italy
August 24, 2016 7:11am CST
As you all probably know by now, during the night (local time) there was an earthquake here in central Italy. The area concerned is on a mountain range and, as it is summer, there are many tourists there this month, making it difficult to know exactly how many people are missing.. Entire villages have become one single mass of rubble and debris and teams of rescue workers are now busy aiding the injured, providing shelter and food for the many homeless and, with the help of their trained dogs, searching for people still trapped in their fallen homes while they were sleeping. At the moment, and for over at least two hours, the number of victims is "only" 38 with hundreds injured. This number is destined sadly to increase during the next hours (maybe days) as bodies are found under the crumbled buildings. While listening to the updates on television, and journalists comparing this event with previous earthquakes over the past years, I notice that the number of victims is one of the main points of the discussion. Is the number of victims, the number of buildings destroyed, the number of injured or even another factor that which puts a certain earthquake at the top of the list as being the biggest disaster compared to others, making the loss of human life the most important factor?
Earthquake of magnitude 6.2 strikes north-east of Rome, with shock felt across region and mayor in town of Amatrice saying people buried under rubble
26 people like this
31 responses
@LadyDuck (458091)
• Switzerland
24 Aug 16
The number of the victims unfortunately has increased a lot. According to "Il Giorno" the number of the victims is now 90. My cousins sent me a message saying that they have felt the earthquake in Bologna. The nurse of my Mom was vacationing in the Marche, her family still is there, I hope she is safe.
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
@LadyDuck Please update us when you have some news and fingers crossed.
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
now puts the victims at 120 but there will be many more once the rescuers get to a hotel where at least 70 people were staying last night. I hope you soon have news from the nurse and that all is well with her and her family.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (458091)
• Switzerland
24 Aug 16
@mysdianait Mother is very concerned, but I think that the communications are pretty bad right now. I feel that she is safe.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (325793)
• Rockingham, Australia
24 Aug 16
I should think it is the loss of life that determines whether an earthquake is really 'bad' or not.
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
In that case, this evening when the number of victims is updated, this event will be much worse than it appears right now
2 people like this
@JudyEv (325793)
• Rockingham, Australia
24 Aug 16
@mysdianait It does sound like it has been very devastating.
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
@JudyEv It is evening now and the official number of victims is at 120 but will rise once the guests at a hotel which is now reduced to rubble are discovered
2 people like this
• Grand Junction, Colorado
24 Aug 16
I saw the pictures before I left for work this morning and it looks devastating. I'm glad that your ok, I thought of you almost immediately and wondered if you were near to the quake. The next 48 hours will be crucial for rescuing those trapped under the rubble. Prayers go out to those affected.
• Grand Junction, Colorado
24 Aug 16
@mysdianait huge devastation is hard to deal with and when it's in your backyard I think it's even worse. I haven't caught anything since this morning, since I'm at work with no live TV here. I'm blocked from many internet sites. Funny how I can go to mylot though. I guess all we can do at this point is hope and pray.
2 people like this
• Grand Junction, Colorado
25 Aug 16
@mysdianait security parameters at work. Many sites that I try to visit I get a message "That this site can't provide a secure connection." I have a lot of down time at work at times and I try and surf on the computer, a lot of times I just break out my phone. Especially when I'm trying to shop, I get that message a lot or looking up information about current events, i.e. the earthquake yesterday.
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
25 Aug 16
@beaniefanatic13 yes that does seem all we can do. Why are you blocked from many sites?
1 person likes this
@MALUSE (69413)
• Germany
24 Aug 16
Of course, the number of casualties is more important than the number of destroyed buildings.
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
The casualties are more important than the injured, too.
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
@MALUSE i feel the same way as you.
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
@JolietJake Yes sadly the media seem tp forget about the imured very quickly yet they are the people wjho suffer more than those who die immediately.
1 person likes this
@sol_cee (38223)
• Philippines
25 Aug 16
'The town isn't here anymore.' That's tragic.
2 people like this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
25 Aug 16
It is indeed
@sol_cee (38223)
• Philippines
25 Aug 16
The world, in just a snap of a finger, will turn into a pile of rubbles.
@VidaVida (133)
• Jakarta, Indonesia
25 Aug 16
So much tragic.... :'(
1 person likes this
@Mike197602 (15487)
• United Kingdom
24 Aug 16
the richter scale measures just the power as far as I remember. Then it all comes down to what you're measuring...damage done, people killed, people injured, financial costs etc etc. So you could list earthquakes by most powerful, most deaths, most damage and highest cost.
2 people like this
@sabtraversa (12938)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
Right, Richter measures the power, Mercalli measures the effects. It all depends on the prevention, it's definitely sensational when you don't expect it and when your building aren't ready to deal with the phenomenon.
3 people like this
@Mike197602 (15487)
• United Kingdom
24 Aug 16
@sabtraversa thanks..I'd never heard of Mercalli
3 people like this
@thesids (22180)
• Bhubaneswar, India
24 Aug 16
I am so glad to see you back here dear MysD. How is your health now. The natural disasters in my opinion should be rated taking into consideration the number of lives lost, the damage done to the property and other structures and also the severeness of the disaster as per the prevalent measuring standards. The number of lives lost at times is minimized - as today's tech helps in predicting some disasters and steps are taken to relocate the people to safer zones temporarily.
1 person likes this
@akp100 (13640)
• India
24 Aug 16
Hello there... I agree with you. Such disaster can't be count big if the scale of it saying it big. It is related with how many people got affected because of that. How much they lost? That is important thing. I am glad that people there are getting together and helping each other. This is important thing, as I have seen that such incident always bring people together. And they should be.
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
Long timè no see It is so true that after a disaster the whole community rallies round. Sad that In normal ti es people argue all the time It is indeed so sad @sjvg1976
2 people like this
@akp100 (13640)
• India
25 Aug 16
@mysdianait that's how it goes. But at least it is good that they are working like one in worse situation. @SJ... Seeing you after long. Lol, you have responded to my discussion but because of new name I didn't able to recognize you.
2 people like this
@sjvg1976 (41131)
• Delhi, India
24 Aug 16
I was just seeing the news and getting sad to see such a big disaster.
1 person likes this
@sjvg1976 (41131)
• Delhi, India
24 Aug 16
Number of lives lost decides how much severe is the earthquake. I remember how bad it was in India (Latur) around 20 years back when thousand of people lost their lives and infinite people got injured in it.
1 person likes this
@hereandthere (45651)
• Philippines
24 Aug 16
i read about it earlier today, but didn't know that it was a tourist area. i hope they get to everyone.
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
It is a race against time but the rescuers were quick to arrive on the scene and get organised.
1 person likes this
@anrain (77)
• Cebu City, Philippines
25 Aug 16
I don't know how to decide how bad an earthquake is, because I can't even describe how I felt when a 7.2 magnitude earthquake struck our place last October 15,2013, and it was unforgettable, with a record of more than 4000 aftershocks. Maybe at that time all I care is how my family will survive.
1 person likes this
• United States
24 Aug 16
I heard on Facebook and contacted Michael to see if this effected you. I'm glad to see you online, and will pray for those who are suffering from this earthquake.
1 person likes this
• United States
24 Aug 16
So sad to hear this today and I hope they find that the casualties are low and many people can be rescued
1 person likes this
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
24 Aug 16
Hopefully but from the scenes of destroyed homes that are being shown on television I fear the number of victims will increase a lot in the next hours.
2 people like this
@nanette64 (20364)
• Fairfield, Texas
24 Aug 16
Oh my gosh @mysdianait . How horrible! Between earthquakes, flood and fires, across the world, I don't know what is worse.
1 person likes this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
24 Aug 16
The level of disaster cannot be measured by life alone. I realise that this may seem very controversial, but other factors have to be considered. The loss of life is undoubtedly a major factor, but we have to consider the overall effect of damage and the consequences. If a vast area is devastated it can have a serious effect on the livelihood of residents in respect of homelessness and lack of employment.
1 person likes this
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
24 Aug 16
I'm so glad to hear that you are safe. Even knowing the town you live in told me nothing about whether it was likely to have affected you or not. I think that, for me, the severity of an earthquake or other disaster is measured by the amount of damage it caused. I feel sad, of course, for the injuries and the loss of life but it is the pain of those who have to rebuild their homes and their lives which affects me most.
1 person likes this
@SIMPLYD (90722)
• Philippines
25 Aug 16
I think it is the combination of the total damaged buildings , infrastructures and lost lives . I am so sorry to hear that a lot have lost their lives in that earthquake .
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
25 Aug 16
Yes it is indeed very sad
1 person likes this
@louievill (28851)
• Philippines
24 Aug 16
"What decides how bad an earthquake is?" - Magnitude of the quake, secondary tremours, posibility of a tsunami for scientists - deaths and injuries for health workers, hospitals, victims, leaders and politicians - damage to infrastructure and property for engineers, economists, business, politicians and leaders. Over all I think it depends on who's looking.
1 person likes this
@sishy7 (27169)
• Australia
25 Aug 16
I have been thinking about you since I first heard about it... I don't know how near or far are you from central Italy... So far I haven't heard if there were any Australians among the victims...
@mysdianait (66009)
• Italy
25 Aug 16
I am up in the north and far from the disaster area. Thank you for your concern It is a tourist area but at the moment there are no official reports of foreigner among the victims. If there are any then I guess that their relatives would be informed before their identities were made public.
1 person likes this
• United States
24 Aug 16
That one was 6.2 I believe which is very strong according to the scale. Now if it happened in a deserted area it wouldn't be considered bad, but even a lesser strength in a very populated area is bad. Then take into consideration the history of the area - you can't rebuild that.
1 person likes this