Is Barak Obama pro-choice enough?

Why laugh at social advancement? This is the next step in our evolution: to cut dead weight. Why hold back? I know that Obama will eventually show his progressive thought and intelligence as he comes to office and approves Supreme Court justices that will support our views, that is why I am so energized to help him in his campaign! Obama 2008!

Hmmm, and what is he going to do with the ones who are already on the bench? Will he euthanize them because they're old? LOL!

That is a good idea - perhaps, if it benefits the people.

I think I had better go and draw my husbands attention to this post.

The rights of the most successful and productive person within the society should have the choice. For instance, those who are pulling welfare should probably be kindly euthanized because they are not benefiting society at all. This would give us the free funds to support beneficial social programs like Obama's health care program, etc. We would not be in a deficit very long after that. We must do all we can to support the productive members of society, and eliminate the leeches of society. This is the change we need in our country, wouldn't you agree? Many don't realize that this is the direction we will head after our Marxist revolution. Euthanizing unwanted babies and children, as Obama and I support, is just the beginning. Let us take our next evolutionary step and admit that overpopulation and waste are two problems easily solved! Make sure you vote Obama in November!

ROFLMAO!!! You can't really be as "out there" as you seem unless you're off your meds.

For instance, those who are pulling welfare should probably be kindly euthanized because they are not benefiting society at all.

Ok, you've really established that you're full of s%*t. No one is that stupid so thanks for the laughs.

What makes you think I'm the one "out there"? Aren't the majority usually ignorant? Whatever benefits the people is what is best for the people. If those pulling welfare, and in nursing homes are euthanized, President Obama will have enough additional revenue from the decrease in welfare and medicare and medicaid to pay for the additional programs that will benefit the majority of hardworking Americans that have utility! To advance the human race, we must streamline our productivity and resources, only the strongest should survive and thrive, then move on for the following generations. It is about the race, not the individual. Unless you don't believe in progressive evolution? Vote Obama 2008!

Look, what is so good about about punishing someone for making the mistake of having their child instead of an abortion; something they realize too late to change in current society. I, for one, am encouraged by Obama's progressive views that will make this a possibility when he is president! We need the freedom to make our own choices.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY&feature=related

Look at this clip: all those conservatives are regressive. We need to move forward as Obama suggests, to allow euthanizing unwanted babies. We need to take the next step in evolution. Real human value and rights are only found in productive members of society, and I think most Americans see that, and are voting for Obama! Obama 2008!

thinkfuture - there is nothing "good" about it. You can't even discuss this under the terms of Pro-choice. You are talking about a living person and murder. If you have the word "think" in your name, maybe you should start "thinkING". Believe me, Obama respects LIFE. People who are Pro-choice respect life, they just don't think that women's bodies should be governed by a government of men. What they do with their bodies is up to them, their families, their physicians and their higher power (God).

You are talking nonsense.

So you don't believe it's life when the child is inside the woman's body, that's your opinion. Obama however supports the murder of infants OUTSIDE the woman's body if the child is viable after an abortion. I don't know how anyone can condone that without acknowledging it as murder.

LOL zyde: answer me this, 1) when does life begin, and 2) who should decide when it ends? 3) What is life? What stage of homosapien existence do you consider "life"? If an fetus has no memories (clean slate) and a Alzheimer's patient has no fluid (coherent) memories, are they not in a similar mental state of uselessness? This is why many European nations allow Euthanasia - and we have allowed infanticide under Obama. I am not trying to portray it as a negative, but rather, "kill or be killed." Either eliminate the waste or it will eliminate your way of life. It will inconvenience you, and destroy your life. If we abort out of convenience, and it is not wrong, what is so bad about euthanizing out of convenience? They had their chance to live long, productive lives, isn't that enough? Fetuses are nothing but leeches physically, as you claim, but aren't elderly the same, only in a slightly different way?

Taskr: answer me this: why do you believe euthanizing for other's benefit is wrong (regardless of age) especially if they do not know about it (fetus, baby, teen, adult, elderly)? If they don't know about it, will it hurt them; what if it would save the lives of thousands - would it be right then?