Another state redeclares it's sovereignty

@xfahctor (14113)
Lancaster, New Hampshire
February 7, 2009 9:40am CST
Washington state will become the 16th state to do this if thsi resolution passes. I have posted on this quiet revolution before, the 10th amendment reafirmation act that many states have passed. I pasted the text of the resolution for those with out a pdf reader. If your state doesn't have this yet, GET IT show it to your reps and insist on it. THIS is how we can actively take our states back from the cliurches of washington and away from the brink of totalitarianism. Simply begin exercising and re asserting the rights granted to our states under the constitution. 1028.1 _____________________________________________ HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL 4009 _____________________________________________ State of Washington 61st Legislature 2009 Regular Session By Representatives Shea, Klippert, Condotta, Kretz, Anderson, McCune, and Kristiansen Read first time 01/30/09. TO THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND 2 TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF 3 REPRESENTATIVES, AND TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 4 UNITED STATES, IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED, AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE 5 SENATE AND SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF EACH STATE'S 6 LEGISLATURE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 7 We, your Memorialists, the Senate and House of Representatives of 8 the State of Washington, in legislative session assembled, respectfully 9 represent and petition as follows: 10 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United 11 States specifically provides that, "The powers not delegated to the 12 United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, 13 are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and 14 WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal 15 power as being those powers specifically granted to it by the 16 Constitution of the United States and no more; and 17 WHEREAS, Federalism is the constitutional division of powers 18 between the national and state governments and is widely regarded as 19 one of America's most valuable contributions to political science; and 1 WHEREAS, James Madison, "the father of the Constitution," said, 2 "The powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined. 3 Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and 4 indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external 5 objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. The 6 powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects 7 which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, 8 and properties of the people."; and 9 WHEREAS, Thomas Jefferson emphasized that the states are not 10 "subordinate" to the national government, but rather the two are 11 "coordinate departments of one simple and integral whole. The one is 12 the domestic, the other the foreign branch of the same government."; 13 and 14 WHEREAS, Alexander Hamilton expressed his hope that "the people 15 will always take care to preserve the constitutional equilibrium 16 between the general and the state governments." He believed that "this 17 balance between the national and state governments forms a double 18 security to the people. If one [government] encroaches on their 19 rights, they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed, 20 they will both be prevented from overpassing their constitutional 21 limits by [the] certain rivalship which will ever subsist between 22 them."; and 23 WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means 24 that the federal government was created by the states specifically to 25 be limited in its powers relative to those of the various states; and 26 WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as 27 agents of the federal government; and 28 WHEREAS, Many federal mandates are directly in violation of the 29 Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and 30 WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. 31 United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply 32 commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and 33 WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations and 34 some now being considered by the present administration and from 35 Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States; 36 NOW, THEREFORE, Your Memorialists respectfully resolve: 37 (1) That the State of Washington hereby claims sovereignty under HJM 4009 p. 2 1 the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all 2 powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government 3 by the Constitution of the United States; and 4 (2) That this serve as a Notice and Demand to the federal 5 government to maintain the balance of powers where the Constitution of 6 the United States established it and to cease and desist, effective 7 immediately, any and all mandates that are beyond the scope of its 8 constitutionally delegated powers. 9 BE IT RESOLVED, That copies of this Memorial be immediately 10 transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United 11 States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the 12 House of Representatives, the President of the Senate and the Speaker 13 of the House of Representatives of each state's legislature of the 14 United States of America, and each member of Congress from the State of 15 Washington. --- END ---
3 people like this
7 responses
• United States
7 Feb 09
My state has not introduced this. But a group of us are working on it. We are working with our reps to get this done. Thanks so much for sharing. We need to get all the states to do this NOW.
2 people like this
@peavey (16936)
• United States
7 Feb 09
I'd like to know what other states have done this, too, and where I can get more information. Thanks for bringing it to our attention!
2 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
7 Feb 09
Thank you for posting this, X! I hope that Washington joins the ranks of the other states who have similarly re-asserted their sovereignty. As well as their impatience with the federal government's power grabs. Of course, I don't see any effect from this legislation until the first state's successionist declaration is filed. The tyrants in D.C. might take notice then. Of course, even that wouldn't be a guarantee that the pigs in D.C. would stomp chomping at the trough long enough to acknowledge that they have stepped way over the Federalist line!
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
8 Feb 09
I am a Canadian and do not know how this will impact us. If it is to prevent Obama for making America into a fully socialist state, I am all for it. I know that Obama wants to get rid of the law that permits States to choose to be pro-life, and to choose their own state law instead of being dictated by Obama. My husband said that Obama is just a figurehead, but I doubt it, he sure does not act that way. He acts as if he is the law and that scares me. America needs to have some balance and the States need the rights and if the only way they can get it is to declare sovereignty I am all for it. Besides when we drive from the rest of Canada into British Columbia, we have to pay money to get into Banff Park and I guess that makes British Columbia a sovreign province.
• United States
8 Feb 09
My state has not introduced this but the local libertarian party has attempted to get some action. It is difficult now that everyone keeps looking to the federal government to solve the current economic crisis instead of thinking of the feds as a big part of the problem.
• United States
7 Feb 09
Good for Washington State! Can you tell me what the 15 other states are to have done such a thing? I'm pretty sure my state (NY) hasn't done so and will be reluctant to do so since we have a democrat governor who is also an 0bama cheerleader, but I'd like to make the suggestion to my representatives anyway.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
7 Feb 09
"As things stand right now it looks like Oklahoma, Washington, Hawaii, Missouri, Arizona, New Hampshire, Georgia, California, Michigan and Montana will all definitely consider sovereignty bills this year. They may be joined by Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Alaska, Kansas, Alabama, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania where legislators have pledged to introduce similar bills. Twenty states standing up to the federal government and demanding a return to constitutional principles is a great start, but it remains to be seen whether legislatures and governors are brave enough or angry enough to follow through." http://www.ask.com/bar?q=16+states+have+recently+re-asserted+their+sovereignty+to+the+US+federal+government&page=1&qsrc=2417&zoom=&ab=0&u=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2009%2F02%2F05%2F183354.php
1 person likes this
• China
8 Feb 09
it is so long