Is Going "Green" Actually Saving The Environment?
By sierras236
@sierras236 (2739)
United States
March 27, 2009 1:32pm CST
The going green craze is sweeping across the nation. However, is the so-called energy saving products and green products actually saving the environment? My biggest case against so-called green products is the energy saving light bulbs. Each energy saving light bulb contains about 5mg of Mercury. That may not seem a lot but if you consider how many light bulbs are actually used, the number of Mercury seeping into the ground and water supply is staggering. Furthermore, if you break that light bulb, you are being exposed to this hazardous material. Furthermore, most aren't aware that these light bulbs need to be disposed of at hazardous waste disposals and not simply thrown away. Sure they save you energy, but at what environmental cost?
You can go directly to the GE website for more information. They aren't hiding this fact.
1 person likes this
2 responses
@Pose123 (21635)
• Canada
27 Mar 09
Hi sierras, Thank you for sharing this as I had no idea that this was true. I believe in going green but not at any cost. This is a case where the cure might be worse than the disease. I hope that there are not too many examples like that as people will become disillusioned with the whole idea of going green. Blessings.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
27 Mar 09
Thanks. You are right that this cure is far worse than the disease. The companies who are producing these bulbs aren't denying the use of Mercury but they do downplay the consequences of Mercury exposure.
@Canellita (12029)
• United States
6 Oct 09
I guess the optimum question is what makes something "green"? Obvioulsy these light bulbs do not qualify since they are not eco-friendly. Energy efficient (if that's even true) is hardly the same as green. The only "green" lighting I know of is sunlight so unless GE is making a solatube type product they are not in on the game.


