Louis Farrakhan, Saudi Prince Bandar and...RAND PAUL?  

why do you suppose he canceled? "
um because he is exhausted? this is his first campaign and these things drain a person. Maybe after just winning the primary he wanted to chill for a bit.
since when do Senatorial candidates get honeymoons...lol?
lol indeed - Obama seems to think he is STILL on his. Goodness, all the shivers and good vibrations, the free passes on info that is always public info on all other candidates. Maybe THAT was the honeymoon he spoke of.

I think it will be interesting to see if he appears on other shows in the next day or two. I will say this, if I was his press secretary I would do the same thing. Every time he opens in month on TV he says something that needs to be explained more than he does (call it the Biden syndrome). Meet the press also asked tough questions, and he has been asked mostly softballs and has screwed them up. Could you imagine how bad this could be for him is he went on Meet the Press?

Maybe if the press reported the news instead of making it he and others like him would appear. Just look at how they are reporting the AZ law. They are all condemning it with out reading it.

Who knows why he canceled. I will say unless he really is "exhausted"....he should have gone on. Alot has been said that needs to be cleared up. There is a big difference between what he said and what is being reported. NOthing new there. The news is good for making sensational stories out of nothing and blowing things out of proportions for ratings. It happens to just about all politicans at one time or another.

Somehow a remark about the civil rights act and handicap...has turned into he is pro racism...which is not true...and that he is pro discrimation...which is also not true...but hey sense when has a little thing like the truth stopped the press.
They need ratings. This is how they get it. Sensationalizism and lies.


How is a comments about giving companies great flexibility in how they accomidate handicap people so horrible. He is not saying they don't have to accomdiate them...just that companies should have more flexibility in how they do it.
Also I know a lot of poeple don't agree with "free market"...but he does believe in the "free market". Which means the consumer (the average citizens) has the power to regulate companies...not the federal government.

If you don't agree with Free Market...fine you don't agree with it. But that does not mean that people that do are "racist or discrimatory". They just see it as the poeple solving the problem instead of the federal government. Either way the problem gets solved. But it matters who is the one solving it. Becaue whoever solves the problem is the one with the power and control...the ones with the power and control should be the citizens of this country...not the federal government. So it really comes down to asking yourself who is responsible for solving this problem and other problems in our society...the federal government or the people of this country? one side thinks the feds...the other the people. Neither is "for" not solving the problem.


See the media could have explained all that.They explain things all the time and do "indept reporting" on things all the time. Free market is not a new idea. It has been around a very long time (as long as this country has been around). But have you seen any "indept reports" on free market? Of course not...because the explaintion of it is not as "sexy" or gets as high of ratings than calling someone a "racist" or "pro discrimination". It does not grab people's attention like showing people pictures of the 50s and 60s "white only" signs.