Science Is Not A Conclusion

@porwest (99586)
United States
July 22, 2021 6:19am CST
Science. It is a word that the left has taken a very strong liking to. By their own definition science is a conclusion. For them, science is absolute. And for them, science is not to be questioned. The left thinks that science is an answer. But of course that is not what science is at all. In fact, science is nearly always inconclusive ultimately, as the data and information and discovery we find is ever changing, ever evolving, and sometimes even devolving. Science is defined as the "intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment." In fact, what science really is is an ongoing and constant question. While scientists may have consensus in a particular area of science, it does not mean that scientists do not continue to ask more questions. Study, observation, and experiment does not stop because at the moment something has been accepted as scientifically true. Science always requires further examination. So when the left does not accept that the study, observation, and experiment in the question of climate change continues to be necessary, they are in fact denying the science. And when the left now does not accept the further study, observation, and experiment in the question of what Covid is and what its impact is or has been, they are again denying the science. Of course, we also know that the left only accepts science that fits their narrative, or confirms their belief. Only science which agrees with what they believe to be true is actually accepted, for them, as science. The left wants you to believe, when they drop a word like science, that somehow they have the ultimate answer to the question, when all they are really doing is rewriting the dictionary... As they have done countless times with other words.
5 people like this
9 responses
@NJChicaa (122726)
• United States
22 Jul 21
I have read this twice and I really don't understand what you are trying to say except that "the left" doesn't understand science and that they don't think research is necessary for climate change and COVID. That clearly is not the case.
1 person likes this
@NJChicaa (122726)
• United States
22 Feb 22
@porwest no I don’t support heartbeat bills. I am pro-choice
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
23 Feb 22
@NJChicaa Then you support murder of course if you also believe life begins with a heartbeat. What is the difference between that and drowning the kid after it is born? If it is alive according to the heartbeat, it is as alive in the womb as it is outside the womb. I just don't get it. Life is not a choice. It is a responsibility.
@NJChicaa (122726)
• United States
23 Feb 22
@porwest not everyone wants children. Sometimes you can do everything right and accidents happen.
1 person likes this
@lovebuglena (46195)
• Staten Island, New York
22 Jul 21
Have never heard of the word "devolving." What's that mean? The left has their own "truth" when it comes to different areas, whether it'd be science, politics, or something else. And if you disagree with them they will shut you down.
1 person likes this
@lovebuglena (46195)
• Staten Island, New York
23 Jul 21
@porwest Their "truth" is "fake news."
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
23 Jul 21
Devolving is simply the opposite of evolving. Going backwards essentially. As for your latter statement. Spot on.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
23 Jul 21
@lovebuglena And THAT'S the truth. lol
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (36490)
5 Aug 21
The left only follows the science that fits their narrative...control! And confusing the public is part of their control. For example: No mask, mask, 2 or three masks, masks outdoors, no only indoors, no masks at all if vaccinated, mask indoors even if vaccinated. Can anyone say Simon I mean Biden Says
1 person likes this
@dgobucks226 (36490)
22 Feb 22
@porwest Your explanation of science is spot on. Science is a process of proving or disproving theories. And making necessary adjustments/corrections as research uncovers new information. This is what happened with the Corona virus.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
22 Feb 22
@dgobucks226 I am not sure this is what happened with Corona virus at all. The 'experts' all said they knew from the start what the answers were and clearly they did not, and very little science backed up their claims. Many examples can be cited.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
21 Feb 22
You nailed it actually. Science is just the new buzz word the left uses because they think it validates the argument they otherwise do not have. Beyond reinventing the definition of science, of course, the left reinvents all kinds of other words. lol
1 person likes this
• Pakistan
13 May 23
Science is not an absolute answer, but rather an ongoing and constant question. It requires further examination and study, and scientists continue to ask more questions even when there is consensus in a particular area of science. The left's rejection of further study and experimentation on topics like climate change and Covid is a denial of science, and their acceptance of only science that confirms their beliefs is a rewriting of the dictionary.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
18 May 23
Agreed. They don't want true science. They want narratives that support their "idea" of what science is.
@yoalldudes (35035)
• Philippines
22 Jul 21
So many things yet to be discovered in the future. Truth is relative. Even science has its flaws.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
22 Jul 21
And eventually science recognizes them and corrects them. Something the left is incapable of doing. In fact, the left could easily be defined as insane. They constantly do the same thing over and over and over again expecting different results. lol
@yoalldudes (35035)
• Philippines
22 Jul 21
@porwest Im not very familiar with politics in your area. But I get the gist.
1 person likes this
@Fa_Maverick (9491)
• Australia
26 Nov 21
I think both sides do a bit of that not just the left... If you want to convince someone of something youre pushing you dont want to use information that contradicts what you are trying to push. Im considered as left. Through my education Ive been exposed to many disciplines and many many different research thingies (its 615am and I am running on a 3 hr nap) which even contradict at times. Climate change study is obviously necessary it affects everyone... Anyone that denies that is not necessarily a left they are just a prat whether it is saying climate change is due to humans, saying nothing is happening to the climate or climate change was gonna happen with or without humans period. I'm also an immunologist and Virologist (okay in training) with a passion for research. What can I do? Educate myself and give people my knowledge. In my experience I have had people ask me why getting a vaccine could be a good idea... Then they have had the nerve to turn around and be like how dare you push your propaganda... Like damn if you wanted the cons too you coulda asked smh. As said before if someone shuts you down and acts like a child by totally denying other science theyre just a prat not necessarily a left though.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
1 Dec 21
The difference for me is that the left only cites science when it fits their agenda or narrative and dismiss it when it doesn't. As for climate change, there is no proof that it is manmade, or even actually occurring. MANY scientists have disputed the claims of climate change advocates.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
21 Feb 22
@Fa_Maverick There is no dispute that climate change exists and has existed since time began. What has been disputed is that it is man-made and that humans can control or can influence it. We can't.
• Australia
2 Dec 21
@porwest Well then you must have come across some dumba$$ leftists that havent learnt what a rebuttal is. No concrete evidence no because like you said science isnt a conclusion. But some fossil evidences imply that the climate and the environment has changed over the existence of earth. Link me something to read on it not occurring from a peer reviewed source if you can Ill read it and get back to you.
1 person likes this
@HazySue (39265)
• Gouverneur, New York
22 Jul 21
The science of things is changing all the time. As they discover more they need to be able to adjust.
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
22 Feb 22
At the same time the entire premise behind science is asking questions. The way that liberals are using the term "science" is as though it is absolute. Of course it is not.
@Dena91 (16925)
• United States
23 Jul 21
Well said!!
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
23 Jul 21
Thank you ma'am. Much appreciated.
1 person likes this
• India
22 Jul 21
Science is life
1 person likes this
@porwest (99586)
• United States
23 Jul 21
Life is certainly something that science examines all the time.
1 person likes this