My husband gets banned by Facebook – for pornography
By Judy Evans
@JudyEv (325755)
Rockingham, Australia
March 19, 2022 9:55pm CST
Vince, my husband, is a keen photographer and belongs to quite a few Facebook (FB) groups that deal with photography. Some have ‘challenges’ from time to time. The photo above was for a challenge but I can’t remember what the challenge was.
When Vince posted it, FB informed him it had been removed because of pornographic content. Then there was an apology from them, saying they’d made a mistake. He then posted it on another site, saying how it had been rejected and, of course, it got removed again. This happened enough times that he was banned for 24 hours.
I hope he has learnt his lesson now and doesn’t take any more photos of naked pears. 
53 people like this
34 responses
@1creekgirl (40515)
• United States
20 Mar 22
That's ridiculous! How could they think that was suggestive?
9 people like this
@1creekgirl (40515)
• United States
20 Mar 22
@DaddyEvil I looked again and still don't see it!
6 people like this
@DaddyEvil (137145)
• United States
20 Mar 22
@1creekgirl 
I don't either. The algorithm on Fb is crazy. I stopped going to that site four years ago. I was sick of all the nastiness there.
I don't either. The algorithm on Fb is crazy. I stopped going to that site four years ago. I was sick of all the nastiness there.4 people like this
@kobesbuddy (74554)
• East Tawas, Michigan
20 Mar 22
Oh my gosh, that pear has absolutely no clothes on! Shame for shame
3 people like this
@vandana7 (98826)
• India
22 Mar 22
@kobesbuddy She said peeled, not carved..SMH...you expect too much Kharla.
2 people like this
@kobesbuddy (74554)
• East Tawas, Michigan
21 Mar 22
@JudyEv I've watched far too many XXX-Rated Pear Performances, in my lifetime! I need psychological pear counseling, Judy Please, just one small peak at a pealed pear, just once?
Please, just one small peak at a pealed pear, just once?3 people like this
@crossbones27 (48417)
• Mojave, California
20 Mar 22
Not many know but they can easily check but guess they just like will anyone even notice. Facebook is run by algorithms in fact did a survey about that the other day. All they asked about was ai , Facebook is disconnected from real world and employees they want no part of real.
2 people like this
@crossbones27 (48417)
• Mojave, California
20 Mar 22
@JudyEv Haha make him suffer good wify. 
3 people like this
@MarshaMusselman (38652)
• Midland, Michigan
20 Mar 22
That's pretty funny. Maybe people thought there were implications there. 
Maybe had he not mentioned it getting pulled already it might have stayed visible longer.
Maybe had he not mentioned it getting pulled already it might have stayed visible longer.2 people like this
@MarshaMusselman (38652)
• Midland, Michigan
21 Mar 22
@JudyEv that's good on both counts.
1 person likes this
@ptrikha_2 (45467)
• India
21 Mar 22
Ridiculous act by Facebook.
But may be they have highly programmed regulatory algorithm and that banned his account.
But yeah sometimes we do learn lessons to be extra cautious in certain respects.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (325755)
• Rockingham, Australia
22 Mar 22
It wouldn't have been a human that first got upset about it. It would have been an algorithm. But it's all good now. 
@TheHorse (205716)
• Walnut Creek, California
23 Mar 22
@JudyEv I still can't find a racy part. This is top secret. Don't tell anyone: I took a photo of my foot wound this morning and tried to make it look like a vagin...never mind. Like something racy. I may post it here, just to see what happens. I have not "developed" it yet.
1 person likes this
@sunrisefan (28524)
• Philippines
22 Mar 22
It is said that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder; probably malice too. People responsible for the banning of Vince had malice in their minds.
1 person likes this
@RebeccasFarm (86757)
• United States
20 Mar 22
Seriously, I cannot 'pear' facebook..they are utter garbage.
I can see the humor in this what you posted, but that facebook needs to be banned.
1 person likes this
@RebeccasFarm (86757)
• United States
21 Mar 22
@JudyEv Yes it is but useful for some things I guess
1 person likes this
@LeaPea2417 (36438)
• Toccoa, Georgia
20 Mar 22
That's ridiculous that Facebook banned that! Wow, a person can hardly say anything on that site.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (156056)
• United States
20 Mar 22
They should spend their time researching things that ARE offensive and not things that are so innocent.
1 person likes this
@Kouponkaren (5487)
• United States
21 Mar 22
Your last sentence made me laugh out loud. Thanks for that!
1 person likes this
