Women's Life in the Victorian Era ~ How Women Got Around the Strict Social Codes of Courtship

@celticeagle (187437)
Boise, Idaho
January 13, 2026 5:10pm CST
Every aspect of romance and courtship was carefully choreographed with strict rituals. These had to followed to the letter for a woman's reputation was at stake. Introductions between two people were made by family members or mutual acquaintances. This was done to assure that both parties were socially suitable. Young women were always chaperoned; they could go nowhere alone. They could go nowhere alone or be with a man alone. Older family members or trusted family friends were always present to prevent any scandalous behavior. There were no public displays of affection allowed and the conversation topics were usually be polite with no gossip or personal discussions. Women could not call their boyfriends by their first name until they were engaged. Reputation and following social rules to the letter was all important. But, where there is a will there is a way, and women soon devised secret codes they could use to communicate their feelings. They utilized flowers and fans to do this. These items were something women of that time period received and used so it was not out of the ordinary. They were used to reveal affection or rejection without using overt speech to communicate. For instance, red roses meant deep devotion and the yellow carnation meant disdain, rejection. A closed fan held over the heart could communicate deep affection. By slowly opening the fan she was asking her suitor to wait for her. A handkerchief dropped or waving one could signal interest or farewell. Couple exchanged these coded gestures using popular floral dictionaries and etiquette guides popular during that time. These were called floriography and were used to conduct complex courtships within the strict social boundaries of the day.
7 people like this
7 responses
• United States
14 Jan
Wow that's so interesting finding out that flowers and fans were codes. I was very intrigued when I watched the series Bridgerton and how things were back in those days for courtship etc. I certainly wouldn't be able to live in that era so I'm really glad I didn't have to.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
14 Jan
Same here. It's interesting to read about but I sure am glad I didn't live back then.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
16 Jan
@Marilynda1225 ......Appalling probably.
• United States
14 Jan
@celticeagle times certainly have changed. I wonder how the women from the Victorian Era would find life as it is now . Do you think they would like it better or worse
1 person likes this
@DaddyEvil (171318)
• United States
14 Jan
I've always disliked the "Ms. Grundy" types who made your business their business whether you liked it or not. And we still have that type of person who believe gossiping about their neighbors was "helping" them.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
14 Jan
Yes, me too. I dislike gossipers so much.
1 person likes this
@DaddyEvil (171318)
• United States
14 Jan
@celticeagle This is a little town and I always hated that when I went out on a weekend date, my mom already knew all about my date, who I was with, where we went and how much money I spent on the girl before I got home.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
16 Jan
@DaddyEvil .......I would hate that too.
1 person likes this
@chiyosan (30186)
• Philippines
14 Jan
I probably would be a loner if i was in that era. I mean i am not the type to really try and make an effort oflver something like socializing. I struggle remembering people's names much less remember all the codes or secret gestures ... that is so annoying if you cant just be straightforward. Hehe
1 person likes this
@chiyosan (30186)
• Philippines
18 Jan
@celticeagle hehehe true and being so restricted like that... people must have been having such a hard time.
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
16 Jan
I am the same way. Straightforwardness is the way to go. I'd be in trouble all the time I think.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (376602)
• Rockingham, Australia
14 Jan
Very different from today, isn't it?
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
14 Jan
Yes very much so.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (218228)
• United States
14 Jan
I would never survive in Victorian times. I'm too affectionate.
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
14 Jan
I wouldn't either but for other reasons. I'm too opinionated and independent.
1 person likes this
@valherma00 (2126)
• Zagreb, Croatia (Hrvatska)
16 Jan
i've heard of that secret code. so cool. they were more active than people today
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
16 Jan
Women always find a way to persevere.
1 person likes this
• Zagreb, Croatia (Hrvatska)
18 Jan
@celticeagle i totally agree.
@wolfgirl569 (132345)
• Marion, Ohio
14 Jan
That would drive me nuts
1 person likes this
@celticeagle (187437)
• Boise, Idaho
14 Jan
Yeah, but at least they had a way.
1 person likes this