It should say.
By Judy Story
@jstory07 (148487)
Roseburg, Oregon
March 16, 2026 3:11pm CST
Smaller pack with half the stuff inside.
Now with less and a higher price.
Who could want anymore.
There is nothing better than a serving for four being less.
Less is better than more.
You might even loss weight and feel better.
So now you get less for a higher price.
So what do you think about putting this on packages of Food.
A good idea or not.
16 people like this
16 responses
@toniganzon (76928)
• Philippines
17 Mar
Noooo, I don't want anything less for a higher price.
Inflation is terrible here.
1 person likes this
@Traceyjayne (10966)
• United Kingdom
19 Mar
It’s disgraceful how big the packaging is compared to the contents. Portion sizes are getting smaller yet the cost is higher every week ….
1 person likes this
@cuttyrish (3260)
• United States
22 Mar
Honestly, it sounds funny but also kinda true ?? Companies shrinking the product and raising the price isn’t exactly a great selling point. Putting that on packaging would be brutally honest… but probably not the best marketing move. People like transparency, sure—but not that much reality in their face when buying snacks
@LindaOHio (221487)
• United States
17 Mar
Yes, they should put "You're getting cheated" on the label. This has been going on for decades.
@dgobucks226 (37621)
•
20 Mar
Well, it should read "less is not more." Although, you will pay more for less. I'm confused. 
@MarieCoyle (58381)
•
16 Mar
This is happening everywhere with food products. Less content, and more expensive. Shrinkflation at it's finest.
1 person likes this
@Ineeddentures (32356)
•
16 Mar
Less is not better than more Judy
And a less with a higher price sucks
But it seems to be happening more and more
Seems that the food pack can say anything and it wouldn't matter
I don't think most people even read what they are getting for their money
1 person likes this
