Would you adopt an "ugly child" or a child with a disability/disease?

By Amy
Abernathy, Texas
May 15, 2008 7:20pm CST
Would you ever adopt a child the world would call "ugly" if they had a shining personality and a lovableness - even if hidden at first? Would you adopt a child with physical, mental or emotional disability? My heart always goes out to the geekier looking kids on adoption pages and the ones dealing with emotional trauma like the death of parents or abuse. What about you? What are you feelings on the subject??
4 people like this
11 responses
@Sherry12 (2472)
• United States
16 May 08
I really admire the people who are able to take care of the children in these situations. I honestly don't know if I would have the patience to give the time and energy it would require to provide them a good home. Maybe when I was younger I could have done it. The ones who are able to do this are blessed with a very special gift.
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
Once again, I agree with both of you!
1 person likes this
• United States
16 May 08
Sherry, It is always great to hear people say this, we all have a blessing in life they are all just different ones. after all if we all had the same ones it would no longer be a blessing.
1 person likes this
@jillhill (37354)
• United States
16 May 08
I actually wanted to adopt what they called "undesirable" and older child with disabilities or with emotional problems. I am a firm believer that love can change things, not physical but additude or emotional problems. Unfortunately a few years back it was hard to adopt when you were single. today again progress has been made and it's somewhat simpler to become the parent or guardian to one of these kids.
1 person likes this
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
Most of the many children I want to adopt from the ones I've seen would be called undesirable. Most are older - breaks my heart to read how sad they get and how much they want a forever home and a parent or parents to love them unconditionally. I think its so sad that you can't adopt when single. So they'd rather these children just never have a home rather then give them to a single mom or dad? That's so sad and so wrong. That is truly ugly.
1 person likes this
• Canada
16 May 08
I don't think there is such a thing as an ugly child, and children with "disabiliies" are not a problem at all. I don't see why people have problems with them. The people who think these children have problems are the ones with the problems. The children are innocent.
• United States
16 May 08
I happen to be in the profession dealing with mentally and physically challenged and just so everyone knows. Not everyone can deal with these issues. What we don't know we fear. Children with disabilites do have problems but they are problems that can be worked with and nutured and the child can be taught to overcome most of them. I think that is a very fair question some people are not capable of dealing with such disabilities and that doesnt make them problem people. Oh and I do disagree,there are "ugly" babies the same as there are to many people ugly people. Please tell me you havent seen a child with a big head or thier eyes are too close, okay not as much ugly as different. When my fourth daughter was born I was the first one to say she was ugly, she had spock ears, purple hands and feet and orange cheeks. Today she is my swan. I do not think this post was made to be mean just how one thinks. Maybe change the word ugly to different, for the sake of arguing.
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
I always love your answers danish! I know its okay to be in disagreement, but on this subject I'm so glad that everyone is in agreement with me! A child with disabilities as others term it is not a problem! If its learning - you find how they learn, if its ADD you adjust - and sometimes change their diet, certain foods - I'm not being simplistic and saying sugar - cause physical and chemical changes. Every child has something to teach us, gifts to give us, just as we have gifts and teachings to impart to them. This is why I so want to adopt to take in these children no one else will - especially older ones - everyone wants the baby. As for the comment about people who use the term geeky having problems - first - geeky has nothing to do with looks - I don't have a problem, geeky means awkward children - and its these children I'm drawn to, the ones I'd like to adopt because others won't. Again, love your answer, glad to see someone else with compassion. As always thank you for participating - its nice to see familiar - er faces - after such a long abscence!
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
grandmasnook - thanks for your contribution - it is all in the eyes of the beholder, my baby has spock ears kinda and its my absolute favourite thing about him - and there is so much to choose from from his big round black eyes to cute nose...etc... It can be hard for some to deal with, but some open up their hearts and homes and do so. As far as ugly as the world terms them, there are those who will see the light and beauty of their spirits shining through and not see the ugliness. I wonder what made the one responder so angrily write his answers to me? I'm just asking what people would do...others - I know what I want to do, adopt a ton of children and nurture and cherish them and respect them and teach them to treat and see others the same way. Like your daughter I was an ugly duckling as others term it, and GEEKY yes geeky - I use the term, I was socially awkward and different and a little overly intellectual, and I finally turned into a swan - but never saw it - except looking back at old pictures, because it had been drummed into me that I was anything but. Now I still retained my geekiness and I'm proud of it. Its me. Yep geeky geeky geeky, I use the term but don't think I have a problem. Thanks much. I don't want to change it. If someone isn't going to adopt a child because of shallow reasons then ugly is what fits with them. Ugly is the appropriate term, it also fits the person who won't adopt based on that criteria because they don't see the beauty of the true person and likely they are only gauging this based on society's idea of beauty, which doesn't happen to fit my own. Hey and the term ugly got me some great responders who gave beautiful, truly heartfelt responses. So no, even if I could go in and change it I wouldn't for that reason alone. :) + - !
@Aurone (4755)
• United States
16 May 08
I don't know that my husband and I have the emotionally where-with-all to care for a normal child, must less one with a disability. I admire people who can do that kind of thing, but I know I couldn't do it myself.
1 person likes this
• United States
16 May 08
I feel that if someone only wants a "pretty" child then they should NOT be adopting in the first place. Theyre not mature enough (no matter their age) to be a good parent. If all you think about is someones looks...then they will never ever be able to handle the ups and downs of REAL parenting. I would adopt whichever child I was drawn to, or whichever was drawn to me. Regardless of looks. That wouldnt matter to me, the kid can't help what they look like! How sad if WE were passed up for everything in life cuz someone thought we were "ugly" Altho maybe it'd be best for a child to be passed up by a person who thought that-they dont need such a shallow worthless person parenting them. A disabled child is a bit different because that takes a totally different approach to parenting and you have to be able to devote yourself to that. I wouldnt begrudge someone who couldnt choose to parent a disabled child-thats a big decision.
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
I'm really smiling at these replies. I love to find others who, like me, see the beauty inside. I too agree about choosing a child you're drawn to. Unfortunately, like what's said about pugs (this one is a mystery!) or potato chips, you can't have just one with adoption - whenever I look at adoption pages - and don't ask me why - I always look at the texas heart gallery - I see several that call out to me. Thank you for your candid response! And its true, you need to be able to handle the roller coaster of real parenting, whose to know what a child you bore will turn out, what will happen, you love and cherish them just the same!
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
I love that quote grannysnook and totally agree! Abortion wouldn't have been an option had they told me that was a real possibility.
• United States
16 May 08
Bravo very well said! I never answered the post I just responded to another person posting to it. If I were to adopt I would more than likely be the type of person that would go to the children that I would think would need the love and nuturing that I could give. If there were 10 disabled children I would probably want them all. "I do not have the fear" I would be a great mom for them. It doesnt matter what one looks like the beauty is all inside. I had my fifth child when I was 37 years old my daughter said the ultrasound came back and there was a big chance he could be down syndrome and facing that decision I just looked at him and told him abortion was not an alternative, it didnt matter if he had a foot for his nose he is mine. My doctor just smiled and said I didnt expect to hear anything but that from you. "You have not lived for the day until you do something for someone that can not pay you back"
• United States
17 May 08
Yes, I would adopt a child that wasn't physically appealing to the "world". There are many things unappealing in this world and it takes very little to find that. Seeing the beauty in the spirit that is undaunted by it's less than socially acceptable packaging is a wonder. I would be lucky to have the opportunity to share my life with someone who MUST look elsewhere than an attractive shell for their value. I would accept a child with emotional trauma, I have my own and we, I'm sure, could teach each other plenty. Also, as soon as I loved that child nothing and no one would ever be able to convince me they weren't beautiful. That is the power of love.
• Abernathy, Texas
17 May 08
Then you would one who would as I say in my opener who could adopt a child the world would call "ugly" and see the they had a shining personality and a lovableness - even if hidden at first. Is there any reason why you haven't adopted? Their are many waiting children out there in the world - in the states too, aching for a forever home.
• United States
17 May 08
Yes, there are reasons I haven't adopted. That I have the ability to wholeheartedly love an adopted child does NOT compensate for the more earthbound considerations. Time and physical stamina all factor into the decision to not adopt at this point in my life. I have been a parent for 18 years and I know exactly what is involved and I know that I do not have what it takes to raise another child. That ship has sailed.
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
17 May 08
It all depends on what the adoptive parents can handle or whether they have the medical knowledge plus the finances available to take the disabled child or the ugly child (who may need surgery to correct a facial defect that may cause problems like being unable to swallow later,) And it is what you are comfortable with. If you are not that good looking yourself, taking an ugly or plain looking kid would be a good idea so he feels like one of the family, I have read horror stories where adoptive parents got a disabled child but were unable because of finances to get that child the proper treatment or the social worker felt that because of not having children of their own, the adoptive parent would take any child and the child grew up later and killed them. Yet had the social worker given the couple tests, and other couples tests and maybe found a couple where the woman was a psychiatrist that dealt with trouble children and the father a police officer, then the situation would be different. So there are two sides to the story. Me, the ones that look like me and my husband and who is apt to have the same diseases we might have, personality does not matter.
• Abernathy, Texas
17 May 08
I think personality matters, I wouldn't want a mean or petty or judgemental child. I have read horror stories of children growing up and killing their biological parents so you just never know. I do very much believe in nurture molding a child, but some kids are just born evil. Born bad as they say. I forgot how much I love your answers suspensful. You always take time to answer the question well. In my research, many times, if its an older child or disabled, the family gets a grant. And most foster and adoptive parents have to go through rigourous home study - in the above board places. You are honest here, of course, we would all like to be able to be blinded to defects, but some aren't and couldn't handle it. Anyway, as always thanks for your reply!
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
16 May 08
I wouldn't call anyone -- not a child nor an adult ugly. Everyone has something beautiful about them, and we all have our flaws. I'd adopt a child regardless of their mental, emotional, or physical health if my heart told me that they were the child I was meant to be a parent to, to love for the remainder of their lives. Whether they lived to be a hundred, or only for a few years longer. All children deserve to be cared for and loved.
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
16 May 08
I'm sure that I would. I have done a lot of day care and I've worked with children that have ceribal palsy and also those with emotional problems. My father taught kids with emotional and mental disabilities and so it is quite natural for me to be around this stuff. my best friend growing up was mentally retarded. I have a good friend that is mentally retarded that calls me almost daily just to chat. I don't think that i'm in a spot in my life to fairly adopt such a child but if i were...i would. I actually if i were to adopt...go for the needier.
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
I tell myself the same thing about not being at the right spot. But what is that spot? What if I turn around and its too late to adopt? Nowadays, they give you grants for older kids - and for kids with medical problems. And of course with foster care you're trained and paid. I love that you've worked with those unique children. :)
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
16 May 08
Beauty is only skin deep and its the insideof a person that counts. a great personality and being loveable to me would be wonderful assets so yes if I was in a position to adopt a child I would gladly adopt one that had these assets. I would be a soft touch for kids who had been abused or lose their parents. They would need a lot of loving and I would be able to provide that.
• Abernathy, Texas
16 May 08
awww, I bet you would be. Have you looked into adopting or being a foster parent? They train and pay you to be a foster parent and for adopting an older child you can apply for grants.
• United States
27 Jun 08
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder........... Iam the mother of 4 beautiful girls, 3 of which are adopted.(I forget which ones! :)) 2 of these children have disabilities but to me they are the stars that shine the brightest. I also had the honor of being a houseparent to 6 severely retarded children who were not by societies standards beautiful but each in their own way taught me the true meaning of beauty.