Obama has four chefs-why?

Chefs - Picture of chefs
@Fortunata (1135)
United States
March 3, 2009 11:13am CST
Just saw an article about entertaining in the White House. Apparently every wednesday, it's party time. I can't remember any other president having four chefs, so I could be wrong about this, but isn't this rather extravagant, especially now since our government is supposed to be so cash strapped? I can understand a president having a pastry chef and then just a chef that does all the other food prep. Obama brought his own personal chef from Chicago. Why so many chefs?
14 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I remember when Laura Bush was looking for a new chef to replace the one she had let go and she hired the first female Executive Chef...Cristeta Comerford. Cristeta had a staff of five full time employees at that time which would increase as needed...up to 25. She's still the White House Executive Chef and the chef the Obama's brought with them from Chicago works under her. Keep in mind that the White House has three kitchens and routinely employs at least four chefs under the Executive Chef, who is responsible for working with the First Lady and the White House Social Secretary, for many administrations...not just this one. There is also an Executive Pastry Chef who operates as a separate entity, but coordinates with the Executive Chef for all meals and events. The reason for so many chefs is necessity. The President hosts State Dinners, receptions, etc. for visiting dignitaries and has other social obligations. There is also the issue of day-to-day non-official meals. There is a large staff working in the White House and I doubt they run out to McDonalds for lunch. It would be impossible for one chef, even with an assistant, to run the White House kitchens so I don't see it as extravagant.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Mar 09
See my response below about the budget. Every new president has entertained a lot in the beginning but I'm sure things will settle down after awhile. President and Mrs. Bush didn't entertain very often but other presidents did.
@Fortunata (1135)
• United States
3 Mar 09
Thanks for your response. I still think they (Obamas) shouldn't have so many parties, when they're telling people to cut down on their own expenses. That makes them hypocrites.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I don't have a problem with the 4 chefs but a party every Wednesday. Some of his actions strike me as here is someone who has just won the lottery and wants to see how the other half lives. It makes you wonder what he will do next to make new friends, rent out rooms for the night?
2 people like this
@overhere (515)
• United States
4 Mar 09
If you do some research on the web you will see that he is not having "personal" party's they are hosting events where various people are invited. He hosted the award ceremony for Stevie Wonder receiving the nations highest musical honor (I suspect Bush would have hosted this too if he had been still in office) While The President was in Canada Michelle hosted an event for Black History month attended by 200+ 6th+++/7th graders from the city. A dinner for state governors, super Bowl Party for both Democrat and Republican lawmakers etc etc. These aren't partys as such they are the sort of gatherings where discussions are dune and ground is broken. This is far more productive than the previous presidents habit of being in bed by 9pm! As for 5 chefs there are 7 days in the week and events and "things" going on at the white house all the time. In truth I am actually surprised there are only five chefs. Will this president ever be given some support or is there going to be nit pickicking over every thing he does or doesn't do.
• Canada
4 Mar 09
Excellent comment overhere. You said it so well.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I may be wrong, but I think the family is responsible for providing their own personal food. If he can afford a chef, fine. I resent the expense if we are paying for it, though, especially since we're scrounging to find the money to buy food.
@Fortunata (1135)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I think he's setting a bad example, on the one hand, telling people to cut down on their own expenses, and then partying his butt off. Also, Michelle sent her aide on a 'fashion fact finding' mission to Paris. Guess who paid for her first class flight? Ka-ching! We did. What good did it do? She's still wearing the same hideous sleeveless dresses. You think she would have learned after wearing the 'Yabba dabba don't dress at the inaugeration.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Mar 09
One thing many folks don't realize is that the White House budget for the fiscal year was already set and reducing expenses a bit here and a dab there isn't going to make dent in our national debt. What it will do though is send the wrong signal to the rest of the world. We're *supposed* to be the most powerful nation in the world. I do agree that the fashion fact finding mission to Paris was a waste of time and money though!
1 person likes this
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
3 Mar 09
Who knows. It definitely appears to be going overboard there... I had heard about the party time on Wednesdays. They seem to be great on entertaining and want to keep the White House open for everybody to come (but thus far those entertainment events were pretty much invitation only, lol). Anyhow, in this time and age, do we really have to hire music greats and such to entertain in the White House. Who is paying for that? Most likely not the Obama's. They seem to have a good ole time while the rest of us has to cut out the partying in an effort to tighten our belts. They really should set a better example IMO. Next we'll hear 'let them have cake!'
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I think the Bushes had their share of musical entertainment as well, they just didn't have as good a taste as the Obamas. Annie
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I'm sure they entertained, although they were more private people and rather went to bed early. Most certainly did they not entertain every Wednesday. Don't let your hate for Bush blind you;)
@BlueGoblin (1829)
• United States
3 Mar 09
You can expect the President to make his own PB&J sandwiches. j/k Seriously, this is scrapping at the bottom of the barrel. Surely there are more scandalous things out there. Bush probably had four chefs himself. Why can't the Democrats and Republicans get their head on straight? I hate to say it but Republicans are fighting for next election. They don't care about what is going on. They only care about smearing Obama at the moment. But I could careless about any of you. Throw all the Democrats and Republicans in the landfill and start over.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
3 Mar 09
"Bush probably had four chefs himself." He had the same number of chefs...so did the Clintons...and Bush, Sr...and Ronnie...and on and on. Maybe some folks just don't understand how large the White House is and the social obligations of our President...or they like knit picking.
2 people like this
@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
4 Mar 09
There seems to be a misunderstanding here. According to what I have read the Obamas kept the same Executive Chef that worked for Laura Bush. All the other chefs including the one the Obamas brought from Chicago work under the Executive Chef. There have always been 4 or 5 chefs at the White House plus additional help as needed. There is also more than one kitchen in the White house, also nothing new. So I don't think there has been a change.
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
3 Mar 09
Well, let him know that you just spotted a wasteful spending in the White House kitchen that would have to be cut to help balance the budget! Unless, of course, the president is about to feed us all!
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
3 Mar 09
Only if you are invited to one of the Wednesday parties;)
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
3 Mar 09
I guess several others have beaten me to the punch as far as saying why four chefs and that previous Presidents have had just as many. However, I was a bit confused as to why Laura Bush had found it necessary to buy new china a few weeks before they left the White House. Annie
@Gesusdid (1676)
• United States
4 Mar 09
i have no clue why he would have so much chefs , well at least he wont go hungry lol i now i wouldnt
@pratik87 (1927)
• India
4 Mar 09
because he cannot boil his own eggs..hehehe
• China
4 Mar 09
Maybe he considered for the others who visit the White House.For example,maybe he thinks to let the Chinese Premier to just eat steak or sandwich is not so polite.Actually I don't know,just want to say that he has his own reason to do that.Believe him to try his best to be a good man in the White House. Happy mylotting.
• United States
4 Mar 09
It is ridiculous but most of our presidents in our time have had full kitchen staffs, as well as florist and maids, people who keep the white house running.
@Jingpols (63)
• Philippines
4 Mar 09
It still does follow to the common saying... the way to the man's heart is through his stomach... LOL