Thoughts On Unemployment

@ZephyrSun (7381)
United States
March 31, 2009 7:18am CST
The new jobless rates are out and the numbers don't really look all that great. Last week when I had on the local news there were talking about unemployment declining but, personally I think that has to do with people running out of unemployment benefits and are not considered unemployed. So do you think it would be good to actually have an accurate number of the unemployed or do you think it's good enough to just know how many are actually getting unemployment benefits? Wouldn't it give a much better look at our economy if we were given the whole picture? What are your thoughts?
3 people like this
13 responses
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
31 Mar 09
Good observation. It is a wildly inacurate number. The only way to get an acurate number though is a voluntary registry. I'm not sure how something like that could be implimented though. I would expect in the next two months your going to see the official number climb at least a few more points before things really begin to sink and it skyrockets.
2 people like this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
31 Mar 09
So Mr. Constitution lol Do you think it would be unconstitutional to set up a voluntary registry? A few weeks ago on the front page of my Sunday newspaper was an article about the unemployment in my city and it said that the real numbers were actually double what it was according to whomever releases the unemployment numbers. It's a sort of scary thought, plus think of all the underemployed. And, no I'm not talking about people that make less than what they would like I'm speaking of the ones that are working 20 hours a week because they can't find any more hours.
1 person likes this
• United States
31 Mar 09
LOL...Mr. Constitution. Actually there has to be some kind of publicly viewable government report depicting the amount of people claiming unemployment. But like many other things within our government these are often hard to find. Plus certain states, like Florida, have such a high number of people getting multiple claims of unemployment because they are not only illegal immigrants, but also they are using more than one identity. This should make many feel outraged. Especially those US citizens that have worked hard to put money into the government to have the government assist them in their time of need. If anyone comes across this report, please let me know. But according to the federal madated laws there needs to be a publicly viewable report displaying the number of people claiming unemployment. Maybe you can find it for your state and we can ask the rest of the myLotters to call their Unemployment/Job Services office to find out this information. Then we can collaborate our information and really have some valid information for a great discussion that might even be copied and printed in some newspaper article....LOL. Sounds like a dream. But its true the power of a group of motivated people can make differences!
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
1 Apr 09
The way I figure it, with all the people they're not counting, and that being their estimate...the odds are, that the actual number is much higher...so these new percentages give us enough to gouge how much things thoroughly suck (granted we know a thing or two about how those stats being "not entirely thorough enough to be solid truth on current unemployment numbers"). Yeah, it'd be great if we had something a little more...real. We don't need no more guesswork from the government, at this point...they kinda, tend to, you know...suck at it. Do you have ideas for a solution? I saw that you were talking about a "voluntary registry"...maybe that could be more like a website that they set up with allowed "feedback for why you disagree with this idea" maybe, to gouge more accurate numbers? I dunno, really. It's decent enough for people who attempt to analyze this stuff to go on -- which yes, I realize sounds kinda sad...
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Apr 09
Oops, I wrote all that assuming you saw the new numbers per state that came out? Michigan was at 12 point something percent! It passed up California! "Seven states at double digits unemployment" was the name of it. _ no declining, as far as those numbers say...they even put the rate at which the unemployment was rising on a monthly basis.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
1 Apr 09
A voluntary registry would be MUCH worse than the current system we have for determining unemployment. Unemployment counts unemployed people who are actively seeking work. Many people who complain about being unemployed are career homeless people who just want handouts and don't even apply for jobs. As I'm sure you know, people complain much more than they compliment. The people who are employed won't bother to go to this voluntary registry while the unemployed will go there in force, including the people who don't try to get jobs. Also, putting it on a website would exclude those without internet access or who actively choose not to use computers. If you study survey research you'll learn that "self inclusion" hurts the validity of any survey. It's why those internet polls are a joke. The participants must be chosen by the person conducting the survey not by themselves. There's also the issue that on the net, you can't prevent the same person from polling multiple times.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
1 Apr 09
I heard about Michigan's unemployment and that's what made me think of this because I was just in Detroit and I couldn't believe all the closed stores, beggers, and will work for food signs. It's just all awful.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
31 Mar 09
It's a common misconception that unemployment statistics are tied somehow to unemployment benefits. Luckily, that isn't the ways the Bureau of Labor Statistics comes to their numbers. Here's the BLS explanation of how they get the unemployment rates: Where do the statistics come from? Because unemployment insurance records relate only to persons who have applied for such benefits, and because it is impractical to actually count every unemployed person each month, the Government conducts a monthly sample survey called the Current Population Survey (CPS) to measure the extent of unemployment in the country. The CPS has been conducted in the United States every month since 1940 when it began as a Work Projects Administration program. It has been expanded and modified several times since then. http://www.bls.gov/cps/faq.htm#Ques1
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
31 Mar 09
I gave you a paragraph of a FAQ page... Surf around the BLS site, there's good information there. Of course it's just one source, so no reason to just accept it as gospel.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
31 Mar 09
Sorry Para, I just posted the same thing. Good to know I'm not the only one who knows how these numbers are really gathered.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
31 Mar 09
Yeah taskr and I have had this "debate" before with where the stats come from. And, anyone that knows anything about stats knows that the stat is only as good as the paramitors, how they are figured, and who actually conducts the research.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
31 Mar 09
"I think that has to do with people running out of unemployment benefits and are not considered unemployed" That's not it at all Zephyr. You're just buying into the myth that unemployment rates are based on how many people collect benefits. The fact is that how many people collect benefits has nothing to do with the overall rating. "the Government conducts a monthly sample survey called the Current Population Survey (CPS) to measure the extent of unemployment in the country. The CPS has been conducted in the United States every month since 1940, when it began as a Work Projects Administration project." http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm As with any survey, the results have a margin of error, but it is clearly the best indicator we have to measure unemployment with. I'm amazed that so many people still believe that it's based on how many collect benefits. I learned the truth about that when I was still in high school.
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
31 Mar 09
I'm sorry but do you think that asking 6% of the population whether or not they work is an acceptable way of figuring unemployment?
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
31 Mar 09
It's the best anyone can do Zephyr. The polls leading up to the election used MUCH smaller sampling sizes than that and they were treated as gospel. With sampling it's not simply about size, but rather sampling techniques. As it stands, there is no better indicator than the current unemployment statistics. My main point though, was that this is not based on who does and does not collect benefits.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
31 Mar 09
Well I understand that it's not all based on who may or may not collect an unemployment check but, I think that when I turn on my news every night and another business closes its doors. So how can that same news reporter claim that unemployment is going down? Are all the unemployed just dying? lol
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Apr 09
Who is going to report the numbers?
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
4 Apr 09
Maybe our corrupt government officals? lol
@Vladilyich1 (1454)
• Canada
31 Mar 09
They only use the figures from the statistics of those who are collecting unemployment insurance. When that runs out, the person rolls off of the statistics. I was reading an article yesterday that, at the current rate of people being laid off, combined with the kids that are graduating high school and college this year, over 400,000 new jobs PER MONTH are going to have to be created.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
31 Mar 09
Check the links I provided earlier. You are just propagating a myth. Unemployment rates are determined based on surveys conducted by the US Census. They are NOT based on how many people file for unemployment benefits.
@KrauseHome (36448)
• United States
5 Apr 09
Personally I do not think anyone would really want to see the numbers of the actual unemployed out there which includes those who are not eligible for unemployment, those who's benefits have run out already etc. I really do wonder when the end is going to come for this, but at the same time continue to wish the best for everyone as well. I know that when you see people taking any type of job out there just to be employed, you know it's getting bad out there for sure.
@tlb0822 (1410)
• United States
31 Mar 09
I agree with you. I think that it is the number of people just on unemployment, and there are a lot of people losing those benefits. I think there needs to be a more accurate number of those who are unemployed. My fiance has been laid off since January, and they have yet to recieve a call back date, plus there aren't really any jobs that had the same pay rate. Ecspecially since a major plant just shut down that employed over half of the people in this area. These are tough times, and I really don't think that unemployment is declining. I think they need to look further into their statistics.
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
1 Apr 09
I was laid off in September of 07 and have not found a job, well I shouldn't say that I had one job offer that was 70 hours a week over 6 days and the hours were split, I would have worked like 8am-1pm and then 5pm-8pm and the job was too far away to drive home for those few hours. The pay was awful and the work was extremely hard. I find it hard to believe the unemployment numbers that are out when I know many people that are laided off and not sure when they will be called back, or they are just plain unemployed.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
31 Mar 09
Regardless of how these numbers are derived, I find it impossible to believe that the unemployment rate is going down in any location...not when I see long lines of people applying for every available job and not when you can't even get a job at Walmart or a fast food joint. I also read a misconception below about illegal aliens receiving multiple benefits under different aliases in Florida. Employers down here are required to verify social security numbers due to our large, mostly Cuban, population. Employers are severely fined for not doing this. I'm sure there are some who manage to get away with it but, for the most part, the illegal immigrant population in Florida are day laborers who work for cash and, as such, are not eligible for unemployment benefits.
1 person likes this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
31 Mar 09
I know my mom just applied to a job that is closer to her house, a part time position in a nursing home, working in the kitchen anyway, 150 people applied for the job and the person that does the hiring said that there were people that applied lived far away from the job. I too have a hard time believing that the unemployment numbers are going down, shoot everytime I turn on the news there's another company in my area shutting it's doors. When I worked in HR I did the social security thing (I-9) and what a pain it was. We were to collect 3 different ID's from a person plus my employer finger printed.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
1 Apr 09
Good Observation. hehehe. Well for me, unemployment is one major problems in this world. When someone is unemployed the first thing you will think is, what can you do to make a living. Even they say that this number of unemployed people are out there looking, they say percentages but the fact is, that is not the accurate number. Hehehe. I think we should do something about this. If the numbers would increase it means that our world is not getting better anymore.
1 person likes this
• United States
31 Mar 09
So here are my thoughts on the whole unemployment thing. I have never claimed unemployment...and there have been times that I have been unemployed but didn't feel that I was in such a situation that I needed to claim this money. I'm not picking on anyone that does either when I say this. But times have changed. I currently have 8 friends that have been out of work since around Thanksgiving. They were like myself...never claimed unemployment. All were let go of their position because of company cutbacks and company finances, not because of poor review of their work. No severance pay, right around the holidays, and then to fight to claim unemployment??? It wasn't easy for some, easier for others. They all had jobs of which required many years in college and working up the ranks into their positions. They weren't a 6 figure salaried person but finally got a job that they could live comfortably within their means. So here is my point......They have been searching for work while on unemployment. Like every day looking on job search engines, resumes posted everywhere, looking in the local paper, and calling back places of which they applied and had not heard anything from. We have more people on unemployment now than in over 20 years of history. At least that's what the news has been saying and I believe it. Okay, so my point. My friends who are unemployed where snickering at the idea of requiring community service hours while claiming unemployment. These people could be working the position of fixing up parks (of which those jobs were cut by the government), answering phones at certain government offices, manning the disability buses (of which used to drive disabled persons to their jobs, but these positions have been cut), teacher's aide (too many kids not enough adults in a classroom), or whatever their job experiences and criminal records would allow them to do. SO you are essentially earning money from unemployment, working on your network to find a job, new job, or even a new job skill. Volunteer hours would be based on the amount of money being cashed through the unemployment with no more than 15 hours per week. The more money you received through unemployment, the more money you got. And if you wanted to get more money through unemployment, then you volunteered more time. This would allow things to get done in our country that could no longer be done due to job cuts and department closures. It would take lots of time in planning and organizing. But it would allow the recipients to give back to the country while they earned money from a system that might dry up and collapse. SO my friends laughed...but then realized that 5 hours a week doing something that might lead them to another job wasn't such a bad idea. Plus they could put it down on a resume. Not to mention they could stop complaining about the unpainted and broken bus stop benches, the tattered and dangerous park areas, or even the polluted beaches with trash on the shores. What do you guys think? This would give an opportunity for a census to be done and maybe have other reports done within the government that might have otherwise not be completed. AND its an actual job. So if you are just a lazy person who hasn't even started searching for a job then you won't be able to receive the benefits. If you have been on unemployment for longer than a year, then the government could provide some kind of job transition training to get you another job maybe even close to the original pay. Now, I'm not talking about those people that are disabled and claiming unemployment. But even for some of those people there could be jobs: courier, data entry, mail sorting, secretarial work like stapling and sorting. And they could even receive more money for however many hours that they could put in. When you look around your area and around the nation don't you think that there are lots of things that could be done or completed?
@Emperor1 (36)
• China
1 Apr 09
Dear Friend, you said it right, I very much support the idea of you and wishing happiness always!~~
1 person likes this
@vivianchen (2646)
• China
1 Apr 09
Unemployment are worldwide nowdays because of the economic turns down. I am in China. It was said that many factories shut down in south China, more and more people lost their job or about to lose job. Some of them are the backbone in the family, can not image how can they support their family if they lost their job.
1 person likes this