Is our earth becoming over populated?

United States
January 7, 2010 1:55pm CST
Is this fact or fiction? Is our earth becoming over populated? If you think so, where are the most problem areas? Do you think there should be laws put in place for how many children people should have?
9 responses
@writersedge (22563)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Yeah, it's becoming overpopulated. When Native Americans roamed the Earth. They could gather, people used to be able to be nomads and eat. Now, many places, there is less than an acre for a family. If you plan it right and work at it, in a good year, some people can eat with an acre of land (if vegetarian). Used to be when too much feces in an area or polution from various human waste, many Native American groups could move to another location. Now I look around and where would a person move to? There are very few places without polution. Every river where I live is dirty, mostly yellowish brown, mostly not insufficiently processed human feces from run off from septic tanks. The city is not much better, has processing plants, but often that is full of heavy metals when it leaves the plant and ends up in our lake. Our fishing guide (a publication) says there isn't any place in Lake Champlain where the fish should be eaten out of it. Another water area, near the Alcoa plant was killing Native American children until the Natives proved it with $ and independent scientists/researches. Then Alcoa made an attempt to clean it up while still using it. Human beings have a maximum saturation point per area like any other creature. Some places can sustain more people than others, but no place was meant to have this many people. After 2 children, go on birth control. Actually, since we have too many people, it should be after one. Some places like China already have the after one child theory, but they're over a billion.
@peavey (16936)
• United States
8 Jan 10
With all due respect, I see those things as over industrialization rather than over population. Malls and factories don't increase human population, but they do degrade the earth and society. They pollute in more ways than one.
1 person likes this
@writersedge (22563)
• United States
8 Jan 10
Supporting the children you already have. Another sore spot for NY State people. If you have a child every 3 years, you can be on welfare for as long as you can pop them out. We have people with so many children it's ridiculous and their Mothers never worked a day. After a child is 3, you're supposed to go to work, but not if you get pregnant and have another baby. New Jersey, that state will pay for the first one, after that, you're on your own.
• United States
8 Jan 10
I think the earth is doing better with the population then we really think. Maybe study what the government is lieing to us about. but anyhow aside from that, I think that telling us how many children we can have is against our rights. I think family planning and other methods are okay, and encouraging birth control. I think it would be okay that you have to be able to support the children that you have. but this is just wrong in my eyes.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
7 Jan 10
People only occupy about 5% of the earths surface. As for regulating the number of children a person can have.....NO that would be one of the ultimate manifestations of an orweliian nightmare.
• United States
7 Jan 10
Good answer there. I agree. I think it is just another one of the things the government is trying to scare us with like global warming!
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
7 Jan 10
Fear is a politicians and a globalaists greatest weapons. they use it for everything. ie: "OMG We need a global financial regulatory body or the words ecomomy is going to collapse!" OMG We need more freedoms taken over because terrorists are going to kill us all!" OMG We need to pass TARP or we're ging to go in to a depression"! "OMG! We need cap and trade or the earth is gonna melt!" the more they panic, the more suspicious you should be of their motives.
@zandi458 (28102)
• Malaysia
8 Jan 10
Not in my country. It is still far under-populated in where I stay but the problem has been with the illegal refugees that multiple faster than the locals. Many countries have enforced the '2 children' policy. I see many countries are over populated and their Government should encourage family planning to their citizens so they won't have too many children running around not having much food to eat.
• United States
8 Jan 10
Yes I agree that they should implement things like family planning, but it is so wrong to make laws as to how many children they can have. To me that is way against our rights as humans. Lucky for you to live somewhere not so populated. America and where I live Kansas city, seems to be booming with people more and more as the days go by.
@maximax8 (31053)
• United Kingdom
8 Jan 10
It is interesting to find out the population of each country. Then consider the size of the country. It can be worked out how many people live in each square kilo meter. In Australia most people live near to the coast and few people live in the center. Western Australia hasn't as many people as New South Wales. Less than 20 million people live in Australia. It attracts migrants that are highly skilled. Australia is not over populated. I guess that the USA has a much larger population than Australia. I know that China has the one child policy. Putting laws in place for how many children each couple have are challenging. A lady can have a surprise pregnancy. Some ladies have twins. Abortion is not morally right. I think governments should make people aware of how many people live in their country. They could use a tax system to make it financially attractive to have up to one or two children. It would be less financially attractive to have more than two children for example. I would like to see adoption become more popular.
• United States
8 Jan 10
Yes there are lots of other things they can do to reduce the population. Like said above they could do family planning. So I wonder in China do they make the women get fixed after they have their 1 child. That is so wrong. So your child has no chance of having siblings there huh. Is that why a lot of Chinese people come here to America I wonder? This issue troubles me. There are other options the governments are so stupid sometimes.
• Israel
8 Jan 10
China knew that they have more people than they can feed and if their population increases as it was, they would have famine. They instituted a policy favoring one child per family to prevent a problem of huge proportions. The one child per family isn't set in stone. If people have twins in China, they keep both kids without penalty. The one child policy is mainly for city people. It's mainly economic. People with 2 kids pay more in taxes and such and receive fewer benefits from the government. It also is meant to be a one generation thing. If both parents are only children then the couple can have two kids. People in the country also tend to have more than one kid. The current birthrate in China is 1.8 children. By limiting population growth, China has succeeded in entering the modern world and competing on a global basis in the modern world, instead of dealing with feeding the growing populations, dealing with epidemics caused by overpopulation and people living up in crowded slums without proper hygiene and medical care etc.
@stealthy (8181)
• United States
7 Jan 10
Yes, the biggest problem mankind faces is overpopulation. While there is a lot of the earth that has few people, there are very large areas of the earth that are not suitable for people to live. People are removing the forest of the Earth at an astonishing rate and this as much as anything else is causing problems. Population control is a very touchy subject but if it is not addressed at some point, then starvation, disease and nature will do it.
• United States
8 Jan 10
Yes I think it could cause a problem WAY down the road, just like global warming. But the fact that bothers me is it hasn't really happened yet but they want us to live in fear like it has.
@TheCatLady (4691)
• Israel
7 Jan 10
The earths population has grown out of control many times in history. Then a plague or war comes along and wipes out huge portions of the population. As it is now, AIDS is going to decimate Africa unless a cure is found. There will be other pandemics like the swine flu that will wipe out large portions of the population.
• United States
7 Jan 10
Yep I guess fate finds ways of making sure we don't over populate huh. It is bad to think of these things as good but I guess in a way it is just part of life too.
• Philippines
8 Jan 10
yes, the fact is in a way we are overpopulated. but not just in the typical numbers. we are overpopulated in the sense that earth's resources are over-utilized and we have not yet figured out a way to re-use or recycle energy that would benefit the only livable planet we could possibly have at present. about 80% of our resources, believe it or not is used by only 5% of the population... clean water included. so it's not merely population control, but more so on a more efficient use of earth's resources. the more technologically advanced we get, the more pollution is emitted (air, water, land, and the emerging fourth... stress.) human nature is a complex matter that some may agree or disagree on population control issues and how we go about it. somehow, natural disasters is nature's way to communicating a message with us... not because we are overly populated, but it's high time we educate ourselves and the next generations on how to better care for the only home we have in this planetary system.
@shibham (16977)
• India
8 Jan 10
Hi friend, dont mind pliz but i want to say u .... Let them go. Yes, ur thoughts r 100% right. U know my india is second highest populated country next to china. Thanksg
@dorannmwin (36392)
• United States
10 Jan 10
In general I would say that the earth is not over-populated. However, I do think that there are certain places that are over populated. Like New York City as an example. I don't think it would be right for any government to put a limit on how many children that a person was able to have. To me, it just wouldn't be fair. Some people are meant to be parents while others are not and to feel like you should have children would be very painful to many individuals.