The real deal Re: Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007

@spalladino (17891)
United States
December 4, 2010 12:36pm CST
This Bill has been previously blamed on one parent backing over his child, however, this is untrue. In fact, there have been several attempts to pass this Bill over several years and it covers other hazards in addition to the blind spot behind a vehicle. While many parents may believe that the only place a child or handicapped individual is in danger of being hit by a backwards moving vehicle is when one is backing out of their own driveway, this is far from true. Vehicles move in reverse while backing out of parking spaces in parking lots, while exiting curbside parking and even while on the roadway in order to navigate around an obstacle, such as an accident. Regardless of whether we're focused on the rearview camera, the power windows that automatically reverse when an obstruction is detected or the engagement of the service brake in order to prevent a vehicle from unintentionally being disengaged by a child, causing it to roll...all of these safety features are important and will save lives and prevent needless injuries. With new cars now coming with a slew of equipment designed for entertainment and convenience...GPS directions, voice activated music systems, video monitors for watching movies to name a few...does anyone really have a problem with safety features that are designed to protect the most precious and vulnerable among us...children and the handicapped? S. 1948 The Cameron Gulbransen KIDS ADN CARS Safety Act Fact Sheet Every other day a young child is killed in a non-traffic automobile incident. The age of victims in these cases is usually less than 4-years-old. These tragedies are truly heart-wrenching - but also preventable. This bill addresses the leading causes of these needless deaths and injuries by directing the Secretary of Transportation to issue safety standards and take other action to reduce the incidence of child injury and death inside or outside of parked passenger motor vehicles. The Need to Protect Children In and Around Vehicles Since 1999, at least 1,000 children have died in non-traffic incidents and this statistic has been steadily rising. In 2005 alone, there have been at least 222 fatalities. There have been at least 125 fatalities in 2006. The government currently does not even collect data about nontraffic incidents, so we know that the real fatality numbers are much higher. (data provided by KIDS AND CARS, www.KidsAndCar.org A 2002 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study (July 2000-June 2001) reports that over 9,160 children are treated in hospital emergency rooms due to nontraffic incidents. The Bill The Cameron Gulbransen KIDS AND CARS Safety Act, S. 1948 directs the Secretary of Transportation to issue safety standards to decrease the incidence of child injury and death. The Act: Establishes reasonable rulemaking deadlines regarding child safety, applicable to all passenger motor vehicles, in three ways: *Ensures that power windows and panels automatically reverse direction when they detect an obstruction to prevent children from being trapped, injured or killed. *Requires a rearward visibility performance standard that will provide drivers with a means of detecting the presence of a person behind the vehicle in order to prevent backing incidents involving death and injury, especially to small children and disabled people. *Requires the vehicle service brake to be engaged in all key positions and while the key is out of the ignition, in order to prevent incidents resulting from children disengaging the gear shift and causing vehicles to roll away. *Establishes a child safety information program, administered by the Secretary of Transportation. This will involve collecting non-traffic incident data, informing parents about these hazards to children and ways to mitigate them, as well as making this information available to the public through the Internet and other means.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
4 Dec 10
Oh darn no cameras on the back of cars. It might make people better drivers. :) oh and well we know that this is all needed but couldn't people finally remember that they control all the major companies and we could just demand these things and refuse to buy cars without these features. Yes we could and I can tell you the market will follow what people want. I am for this passing I don't think it is the bets way to go but with the people of this country not knowing the power they have with companies it is the only route to take I guess.
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163781)
• Garden Grove, California
4 Dec 10
hi this is great to know and I do hope all of this is passed as it should have been done long time back. I know I am certainly for it having worked in the hospital for many years and seeing injured children from mishaps just like what is mentioned here, of course the ones who did not make it did not end the hospital. I feel for every parent who has had this happen to him or her. there is no horror so had as one where he or she inadvertently kills his or her own child.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Dec 10
Hi Hatley! Some folks seem to view this legislation as another example of the "nanny state" mentality where anything the government does in the area of safety is wrong. I don't agree. As society grows and changes, new problems need to be addressed. I'm sure that you remember when you were allowed to carry your baby in your arms while riding in a car and when most cars didn't even come equipped with seat belts. Over time that changed...for safety's sake...not because we need big government to tell us what to do.
1 person likes this
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
5 Dec 10
I thought of a way to do this all without having to have new tech in our cars and all that. They do it at the company that I work at when ever the vehicle is about to back up or begin moving they honk the horn twice to let people know that it is going to move forward or back up it is how we stay safe in the yard when we are out there. You could teach your kids not to behind a care where they can't see the mirrors on the vehicle and you could use this as a method also as it would be a sound indication also that you are going to be moving so you could teach your kids to get from behind it.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
5 Dec 10
While that is a good solution to a moving vehicle, this legislation also addresses other safety hazards. In my truck, for instance, if you push the power window window in a certain way, it goes all the way up without stopping even if my finger is no longer on the button. What stops that window from crushing a child who has his/her head/arm hanging out of the window. The new technology that would stop the window's motion if something is in the way will save lives and needless injury. Being unable to shift a vehicle out of gear whether the key is in the ignition or not is another valuable safety feature that cannot be overlooked.
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
4 Dec 10
I don't have a problem with any of this save the info program by the Sec'y of Transportation. My problem with that is that gov't into programs like this cost millions or billions when all you would really need is about 20 employees with telephones to interview victims or people who caused the accidents. Or a central databank to retrieve police reports and hospital statistics on such incidents. When I lived in the Southwest, where people love huge pickup trucks even if they never took them off road, there were so many children injured, crippled and killed when their parents or relatives backed out of the driveway. Everyone thought the child was with someone else. So parental supervision is important although you can't legislate that and no parent really believes it will happen until it does. Another way it happens is carelessness. I can't tell you how many times I was almost hit walking from my parking spot into a store. One time the car did hit me but thank goodness it was barely rolling and I just wasn't paying attention. It didn't even bruise me. But it's hard to see when you're parked in an ocean of cars, pickups, vans and jacked up trucks--you don't see a pedestrian till the last minute. Especially small children or slow-moving elderly folks. I know it would raise the price of vehicles but they're already pretty pricey and if a child's or person's life can be saved I'm all for it. I just don't want any government programs to be attached to it--we spend enough on stuff like that and much of the money is wasted.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Dec 10
I'm not too thrilled with that last one either. Down here in Hooterville we drive a lot of trucks, too, and I have a terrible problem with the rear blind spot on both of ours. I usually try to pull through when I park in a store's lot because backing out is so difficult but when my husband is with me we use on of the handicapped spots so we have to back out. Since these spots are also closer to the entrances there are more people passing behind the truck as we're preparing to back out. We haven't had any close calls, fortunately. A very long time ago a neighbor's son shifted their car out of gear and it rolled backwards out of the driveway, across the street and into another neighbor's yard until it was stopped by a tree. Some folks would say that the parents were at fault because the boy was not being supervised but, in real life, you allow your 6,7 or 8 year old child to play in his own yard without watching him. Since the car was not running, there was no warning for other children who may have been playing in the path that car took.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
6 Dec 10
I'm not trying to tell you how to live your life, Lil, but you have portrayed your cul de sac as being extremely safe, with a battalion of other mothers standing at the ready to keep an eye on everyone's child. Why would you feel that your 7 year old is unsafe playing in your own yard? Maybe the general area itself is not safe?
• United States
6 Dec 10
in real life, you allow your 6,7 or 8 year old child to play in his own yard without watching him. I guess I don't live in the "real" world then. I don't let my 7 year old play outside without supervision.
• United States
6 Dec 10
Yep these kinds of accidents are heartbreaking and abosultely preventable. IT IS CALL WATCHING YOUR KID. Yep back up cameras are neat. But what would solve the problem is parents actually supervising their kids. The average age of this kind of thing happening is 4? Well were the heck were the parents? A 4 year old should NEVER be unsupervised.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
6 Dec 10
I agree with you about 4 year olds...and these accidents don't only happen to 4 year olds. Do you realize how fast a power window goes up when the auto button is pressed? There's no internal mechanism to stop it if an object such as a hand, arm or neck is in the way. You can be totally supervising your children while pushing a grocery cart through a parking lot, yet the danger of being backed over still exists and that includes the disabled and little, old ladies, too. Do you also have a beef with ABS systems that keep you from locking up your brakes as well? What about reinforced steel in the doors? Should there be no safety features in vehicles...putting the responsibility for everything on drivers/parents?
@paula27661 (15811)
• Australia
7 Dec 10
We had an incident here just last night when a father accidentally ran over his 17 month old child. The latest news said the child has internal injuries and is in intensive care. I am praying that this little girl will make it and I cannot imagine what her father is feeling! I hope the bill is passed and other countries follow suit. My husband has a rear view camera and it is extremely useful and the electric windows to reverse with obstructions is an excellent idea.