Steven Hawkins comments on American Health system

@urbandekay (18278)
January 25, 2012 3:28am CST
Following a comment in an editorial, printed in the Investor's Business Daily, that claimed that renowned physicist Stephen Hawking, who is disabled, "wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless." Hawking, who was born and lives in Britain, personally debunked the claim. "I wouldn't be here today if it were not for the NHS," he told The Guardian newspaper. Investor's Business Daily has since corrected the editorial. Now it comes as no surprise to Europeans and perhaps the rest of the world that Americans are so blinded by their belief in the dogma of their free market health system that they might believe such nonsense about the UK national health service but get this; the American journalist concerned was apparently too stupid or uneducated and indoctrinated by American hubris to realise that Hawkins is British. all the best urban
3 people like this
4 responses
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
26 Jan 12
If I understand your post, there was an editorial in IBD and someone who commented on it made an incorrect statement? That would not be surprising. If you meant that the editorial in IBD made that statement, then took it out - well, we have no way of verifying what you say. You haven't even given a link to the "corrected" editorial. I would say, however, that it is not the NHS paying for Hawking's rather elaborate system for speech - he is wealthy enough to pay for that himself. I am sure that when he was first diagnosed as a young man, that he did use the NHS but I would be surprised if he used the NHS for the bulk of his health care now, most wealthy people have private insurance and private health care. My spouse is a Brit and has experienced both health care systems, the NHS and the American system, and highly prefers the immediacy of care available in the US. I don't expect you to accept outside criticism of your health care system, people tend to get irritated when they think someone is criticizing their country. On the other hand, as an American, I get irritated when people from other countries spend a lot of time trying to prove that they know better what sort of health care system the US should have. I don't know why it matters so much to them.
@urbandekay (18278)
26 Jan 12
Perhaps then that is a cultural difference, I feel no annoyance at criticism either personal or national. all the best urban
@urbandekay (18278)
26 Jan 12
No the point was not, as you say, to call Americans, "stupid" and "uneducated" and "blinded" but to try, albeit a rather optimistic and futile one, to disillusion those labouring under the delusion that the free market is always more efficient, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary all the best urban
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
26 Jan 12
Then why write the post? Well yes, I do see the point was to call Americans "stupid" and "uneducated" and "blinded" and so on, but still, their apparent misconceptions about the NHS (as you see it) must have annoyed you enough to write the post.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
26 Jan 12
One of the reasons that Europe has the National Health Insurance is they have almost no military budget. After WWII it was the US Army that stood between the Russians and the rest of Europe. Even today we have more troops stationed in Europe than the combined armies of many European Countries and what do they pay for it? Part of the reason that Europe is going bankrupt is they have so many government workers many of them in the National Health Programs.
@urbandekay (18278)
26 Jan 12
Yes, we do have your army of occupation and the sooner it leaves the better The rest of your comment is incorrect. NHS provides equivalent care for a fraction of the cost of the same in US US bases off UK soil now! all the best urban
3 Feb 12
Wait, what has World War II/the Cold War got to do with the NHS? You think America has forces in Europe to, what, keep the commies from taking over?
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
25 Jan 12
Actually, the reason that such a system won't work in the US is because of our government and the freedoms accorded by the US Constitution. Plus, the US is a whole lot bigger than England which presents its own set of problems. The British have a tighter Governmental control over their health care system. They also can implement price controls which is what the US Government cannot do. All our Government does is set the amount they will pay kind of like an insurance company does for certain procedures. What the US Government does not do is set the actual price for the procedures. That is up to the hospitals and doctors. Many people get these two things confused.
@crossbones27 (48444)
• Mojave, California
25 Jan 12
That is America's right wing spin machine for you. You have to forgive them for not knowing he is British. Many people here don't believe in science because they think scientist make things up to become famous and to get more money for there scientific projects. When I think most scientist would tell you if they were doing that then they would just be lying to them selves. That what is the point of trying to figure out the universe if you are just going to make things up. It would defeat the purpose of becoming a scientist in the first place.
@urbandekay (18278)
26 Jan 12
"Many people here don't believe in science because they think scientist make things up to become famous" Bizarre! all the best urban