What are schools for?

@nicanorr (1789)
Philippines
August 11, 2012 6:58am CST
Why send your children to school? Why not buy books and school supplies and teach your children at home?
6 people like this
24 responses
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
11 Aug 12
Hi Nicanorr, Actually a lot of people do just that. I would have loved to do that for my kids but there are many reasons why I chose not to. One of the main reasons would be that I did not have the time . Being a single mom, I also had to work. There is a lot more to teaching than just reading out of a text book. It takes time to plan the lessons and also the ability to present them in a manner that will spark the child's interest and prompt them to ask questions. Home schooling is not the best plan for everyone.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
If time is okay for other activities, why can't a fraction of a time be alloted for the good of a dear child?
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
15 Aug 12
Well, it is more than a fraction and I was a single mom...had to work. Trust me, everything I've done , I've done with my kids in mind. Homeschooling isn't for everyone.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
7 Dec 12
The weigh scale points to your side. Your reasoning is profoundly sound. Hope the kids are okay and doing fine. I wish you all the best.
@berting600 (3453)
• Philippines
11 Aug 12
I like to see that would come true because if possible the education made and done at home would be given credit by the Education Department after the children are given government test to insure they are capable from home teachings.I think it could take a revolution of the education and school organization if things have to change in the methods of teachings.Do you think you could make and change the teaching methods and pay the investments made by school institutions around the Philippines?If you say yes I will be your first pupil,but be sure you are more intellectual than me.
2 people like this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
15 Aug 12
I'm in the US and homeschooling is very much supported. It is good for some families and others, it just could not work. I think that as long as a parent suports their childs ecucaion then there is nothing to critisize those that choose not to homeschool.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
7 Dec 12
Hi,berting600 Thanks for presenting and comparing the school's teaching method of today with yesterday. I agree with you in saying that products of days gone by were more proficient in speaking and writing the English language. Learning today hinges more on the attitude of the individual learner. If he so desires to gain proficiency and mastery in the profession or discipline of his choice, he must devote more of his time to reading, dictionary use, hone his English like we do here and make these 3 stages habitual. The internet-connected computer is an efficient practice ground for acquiring critical thinking and for all materials needed to learn good English. Pronunciation of difficult English words is available in the computer. Merry Christmas in advance.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
berting600 cool ka lang! You and I have been nurtured in school and have seen and experienced the beauty, goodness, and importance the school has given us. But look at statistics. Are our pupils living up to the standards expected of them? Are you sure teachers nowadays can speak English like you do? You have the right to propose things for the good and welfare of the great many. It's also my inherent right to ask what school are for. Cheers and happy mylotting!
1 person likes this
@pumpkinjam (8539)
• United Kingdom
12 Aug 12
I've often wondered that myself especially when my own children already know/can already do that which is being "taught" to them at school! Here, though, kids under 16 must be in education and it's very hard to meet the criteria for home schooling. There is the National Curriculum which must be adhered to so, I suppose, sending them to school to be taught by people whose job it is to keep up to date with such things does make sense. I've already taught my youngest all the stuff they're teaching at school and we have access to plenty of books an other resources or the stuff I don't know. My eldest, however, is in senior school so each teacher is supposedly an expert in their subject and it would be hard for a lot of parents to teach all of that to exam standard. It's very hard to get a good job without qualifications!
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
16 Aug 12
I beg to disagree that children be sent to school so that in the end they'll be issued a diploma for the purpose of landing a job. I only hope diploma are real not one cranked from a mill (diploma mill. Basic things to learn must be acquired before they are issued. Only deserving kids must be given the priority.
@owlwings (43915)
• Cambridge, England
11 Aug 12
Teaching is a skill which needs training to be truly effective. There are certain standards of education in most countries to which children are expected to be educated. A school, ideally, supplies trained teachers, specialising in the subject taught, and a proper curriculum which meets the national standards. Schools are regularly inspected to ensure that they meet the requirements. Many parents are not trained teachers and may be able to educate their children less effectively than a professional teacher. Effective home-schooling may need much more work for inspectors to ensure that an appropriate standard is being taught. The school environment allows children from many different environments to meet and interact socially. This is never as easy for those who are home-schooled, with the result that children may not learn social skills quite as early or as easily as those who attend public schools. This can put them at a disadvantage when they attend college or university and may affect their social skills in later life. There are arguments both for and against this, of course, and, in fact, there seems to be no evidence that home schooled children are significantly less able to survive in a social environment - other factors in their development are probably just as influential. The main criterion for sending children to a school rather than teaching them at home is undoubtedly economic. Most families cannot survive on one person's income and very often both partners must work in order to support the household. The decision to home-school children generally involves some very conscious economic and social choices because one parent, at least, must be present in order to educate and care for the children. Home-schooling is not something which any parent can undertake lightly.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
100% load and hope are placed on the teachers' shoulders who are thought of to be ready and professional trained to impart the basic rudiments of the 3Rs to the pupils. Are they really?
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
11 Aug 12
good question, nicanorr. sometimes i wonder too. in modern standards, there are now what we call home-schooling where an academic institution would just give the synopsis and the materials needed to complete the course. and it is up to the student (and his/her mentor) to do something about it. going to school and getting good grades is yesterdays priority. but then again, most companies are really looking after that diploma from a top school before they could admit a jobseeker. some old-fashioned company following an old-fashioned standard.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
I hope things and priorities be changed regarding job hiring. I believe a diploma isn't a good yardstick to measure the learning capacity of a child.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
7 Dec 12
Where the child is he must be afforded if possible all the learning opportunities. In his formative years, he lacks skills and everything in preparation for adult life, that's why he's born with a parent to help him guide his way. Desired outcomes are needed to make our world a better place to live in. Merry Christmas in advance.
@murkie (1103)
• Philippines
15 Aug 12
in the near future, that will all change. look at all these new achievers. a good number of them never even finished high school.
• China
11 Aug 12
I think in school the teacher is more professional and it can provide a better place to communicate to with peers and share thier ideas. And to me, teacher always shows thier kind to students which make them so popular. So students would foolow the teacher and study better.It's also good for personal intercouse and languange skill development.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
Being professional trained as such, teachers act as good role model for pupils to imitate their ways. School provides the venue for pupils to improve their hearing, listening and speaking vocabulary.
@maximax8 (31053)
• United Kingdom
11 Aug 12
My disabled sons school provides 29 other children of the same age range in his class. I like him to make friends with other children and get the idea of working as part of a team. I have plenty of books at home and I am a qualified primary school teacher. I don't have enough time I teach my disabled son at home. I feel that the school provide education and childcare that is invaluable. My daughter has a child minder and she will go to a nursery for a couple of mornings a week from September this year. She will begin primary school in the September next year. When I lived in Kent I knew a lady that had two daughters that she home schooled. They went to France often and spoke very good French. All that changed when the oldest reached secondary school age and the mom didn't feel she had enough subject knowledge to carry on with teaching that age 11 to 12 years old. Now both girls go to a secondary school but getting there was a shock for them.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
To have trust and confidence in teaching-learning institution is appreciated. And sending kids to school is a noble duty of parents. Is it wise to place all the learning task to the school because a parent doesn't have enough time to help in the endeavor?
@Fulltank (2882)
• Philippines
11 Aug 12
That would be a good idea, but please take also the fact that we don't now everything. Even the best of the best are some point had enter in school. School is part of the society as a place for learning. As church does as a place for worship. When we created society, these basic structures comes with it. Therefore the idea of simply teaching a child by parents will not prepare him/her to face the real world. There are things that a child must learn too, not just by reading a book.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
Your point is clear as water. Schools are indeed built for a grand purpose, but it doesn't mean those who don't like will be forced to enter against their will. Learning to face the real world isn't found only in schools.
@umabharti (3972)
• India
18 Aug 12
Yes kids can be taught at home , to tell frankly home is the first school and mother is the first teacher to every kid.From home every thing starts, Home can be anything it can be an orphanage too where kids learn.Some times life teaches a lot. Schools are needed becox we learn how to socialize amongst others learn different things in different ways, watch the same thing done in different ways by different mentalities. Kids should go to school becox one day they need to go out to earn for the family or for them selves.If they completely stay at home they will never know the world, and life will become hard one day. Life is the first teacher ,and time does teach a lot.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
25 Aug 12
I think you did contribute something of value to the issue at hand.
1 person likes this
@umabharti (3972)
• India
25 Aug 12
Thank you.Happy mylotting.
@asliah (11137)
• Philippines
5 Dec 12
hi, for me my mother sent me to school because she wanted me to learn and will have more knowledge that i can use when i grow up,and yes i actually used them until in my college,and now i am an employee and all knowledge that i have get in my studies are very helpful to me.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
7 Dec 12
Thanks asliah for sharing something to this thread. I congratulate you for passing school requirements until college. You did successfully attain your objectives because of your faith in yourself, in the support of your family and the community at large.
@mythociate (21437)
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
14 Aug 12
In a word, camaraderie (fellowship with brothers-&-sisters under the same burden) Because--when you're in school--your primary goal is 'to get out.' Sure, you do that by 'learning things, writing reports on those things, passing tests, etc.'; and sure, you "plan to go to school" in order to 'gain education'; but once you're in, none of that 'grand scheme'-stuff matters to you---your subconscious animal-mind just wants to get out! And most of the fellow-students there share that subconscious-mind. And studenthood teaches your subconscious mind that helping others accomplish the goal ("getting out of school") is the best way to accomplish the goal yourself!
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
25 Aug 12
Thanks for the response. I have no comment on this.
• Valdosta, Georgia
12 Aug 12
That is exactly what I am doing. My daughter will start being Home Schooled in a couple weeks. =) I am so happy with my choice. Others will put it down but she will be in extra curricular activities so she will still have the social aspect of it without all of the trouble, bullies, peer pressure and all of the garbage that is in school now. I wish my parents did it for me, would have saved me a TON of heart aches and painful memories!
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
You're a rare kind to adopt such a way to educate your daughter. I congratulate you for that. But can you be certain that your child can imbibed and accumulate all the good traits called for in the raising of a child with a well-rounded personality?
• China
11 Aug 12
If you're a parent who is good at education and know how to teach your own children, it's good to teach your children in person. However, for other people, they think school can provide a better atmosphere. All students study there and they compete and communicate with each other. They can exchange their ideas and make many friends. That's the advantage of school education. But most of the exllent students, the grade they get owns to their familt education to same extent. Thus, the best way to educate is to combine these two together. In that way, you children can grow up in a healty environment.
1 person likes this
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
The school and the home will compliment each other in the task related to the teaching-learning situations to produce a better child.
@Otanetix (508)
• United States
29 Aug 12
Schools or educational institutions are usually places where the staff are trained to teach children about the basics of various subjects. While there some schools better than others, school is not just about learning about academics. It is also about learning discipline with completing homework and projects before the deadline. While home schooling might be an alternative way of learning, it can be difficult to always teach children everything they need to know. Unless the parents are trained teachers or fairly knowledgeable about several subjects, it will be difficult to teach children, especially when parents have to go to work. In schools, they also help teach children social skills with children within their age groups. Sometimes, being exposed to other children and teachers will even help them develop ideas and enhance their creative side.
• United States
12 Aug 12
I personally think that a properly educated teacher is better suited to teach my son than I am. It takes a lot of time to homeschool a child. You have to make sure you're reaching certain standards, and that the child is learning the things they would be taught if they were enrolled in a school. I also think that the schools are a good place for children to learn socialization skills. If a child never has any outside contact with other children, they don't learn the socialization skills they need to survive in today's society.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
Isn't it degrading to say that a parent is less capable of teaching things to her kids? Can socialization skills be gained only in the auspices of a school?
• India
12 Aug 12
Hi friend, school is the place of learning and socializing, by sending our kids to the school they will mingle with lot of kids and learn to socialize with others, we don;t have the ability to collect a lot of kids in our home and conduct a school for them, as well as school is the place for teaching various things
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
16 Aug 12
Can our kids not mingle with their peers in the neighborhood? It is your idea of collecting kids in your home, not mine. Who teaches the kids to eat properly, take a bath, clean the house and do lot of things besides, is it not the mother? father? Mind you many lessons are learned in the home because most of time kids stay at home and the neighborhood. Teachers merely help.
@paulli3 (312)
• China
12 Aug 12
school not ony can provide our chirldren knowledge, the more important is schools can teach our chirldren how to get along with others, it is so important, only we can get along well with others, we can get success in the future. so many people choose to send their chirldren to school becuase they want to make their chirldren learn how to get along well with others
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
socialization with their peers in school is a good point but it must be tempered.
@Rif0101 (13)
12 Aug 12
school is a place to communicate and learn. in school we can get a friend who can share your opinions. if we teach our children at home is definitely less attention. in school can also get archievements. we also will have a beautiful experience.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
16 Aug 12
In school pupils communicate with peers only 8 to 10 hours, whereas children in the home talk with their parents, siblings and other kids in the community 14 solid hours. There's more communication or talking taking place outside of school so there's more learning taking place in the home or outside of school.
@drimerz (79)
12 Aug 12
i think is more to let the child live with another person, so the child will not be an individual person, playing arround with another child will make your child happy, one thing that child really need is have fun with another child, thats why i think :)
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
16 Aug 12
Yes, you can achieve your purpose by having kids play with peers from the neighborhood. Their association with classmates in school takes but a limited time.
• China
12 Aug 12
Firstly,parents have no idea what to teach,they don't know what's of great significance. As regards the synopsis,only teachers who are qualified can tell children what's important. Further more, how can children learn sth just by reading books? How can children be successful just with the help of their parents? They need the help of their teachers and the competition among their classmates. Parents and children themselves have no idea what to learn, which definitely can discourage them. Finally, the school is quite a small society. Children are able to learn the skills they need when they enter society.It's quite difficult to learn all those at home with the help of their parents and books.
@nicanorr (1789)
• Philippines
14 Aug 12
Is it an admittance that parents have nothing in their head to teach their children?