14,000 Hunting kit found in Scotland

@ElicBxn (64169)
United States
April 12, 2009 4:53am CST
This pushs back human appearence in Scotland 3,000 years and shows a different culture than what was previously known in England. I tell you, those ancients really got around! The culture that produced these points were from northern Germany and Denmark, I know some people that have barely been 200 miles from their BIRTH PLACE! And this is in the day and age of autos and airplanes! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30153685/ This is great news for those of us who just love to learn anything about ancient history... Now, I've got to go back and follow some of those links...
1 person likes this
11 responses
@benhilo (871)
• Tripoli, Libya
12 Apr 09
People in ancient times did get around more than most people think and traded. How about this one, a roman helmet and roman coins were discovered at the South Point of the island of Hawaii at the outbreak of WWII. It is said that a roman helmet was the basis for the headdress the Hawaiian King wore. Of course the headdress also looks like those worn by Tibetan monks. PS: I also know people on the island that have never left the island
12 Apr 09
Though I doubt that Romans made it to Hawaii, I do know that Roman traders reached China and traded regularly with India and ports on the East African coast. I have also seen reports that Roman amphorae have been found off the coast of Brazil - presumably from a wreck. It's not impossible that a merchant ship was driven off course by storms and ended up on the coast of Brazil.
2 people like this
12 Apr 09
I'm not saying that they are not genuine, but they might have been taken there by a collector sometime in the last 100 years or so.
1 person likes this
@benhilo (871)
• Tripoli, Libya
12 Apr 09
You may have your doubts however the artifacts are currently in the Smithsonian. You further validated my statement that the ancients traveled and traded much more than we know. So it is not hard to conceive that artifacts from Denmark and Germany to find its way to Scotland. Beside, at one point in time wasn't the British Isles connected to Europe? How about runes found in Davenport Iowa?
1 person likes this
@riyasam (16556)
• India
12 Apr 09
thats useful information you have given!the archealogists have done a good job and it will definetly prove helpful into knowing the origin of scots and their nature in those days.
2 people like this
12 Apr 09
No Scots in those days I'm afraid. Scotland was mostly still covered with ice...
1 person likes this
@jwfarrimond (4473)
12 Apr 09
Very interesting. As the article says, these people were hunter gatherers and as such they followed the herds in there seasonal migrations over quite long distances. This was probably the site of a summer hunting camp on the edge of the Scottish ice cap. Incidentally, so archaeologists have suggested that at least one Paleolithic culture in North America originated with people of the Solutrean culture of France who migrated over the sea ice from Europe to North America. Not an impossible journey using skin boats similar to those of the Inuit and hunting seal en route.
2 people like this
@ElicBxn (64169)
• United States
12 Apr 09
still it's an interesting artical, I love this old stuff, wish I had the health to have been an archiologist!
1 person likes this
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
12 Apr 09
I love to learn about things like this also. It is very fascinating at times. I really like learning about how things came about ro used to be.
2 people like this
@ElicBxn (64169)
• United States
12 Apr 09
isn't that the truth! Hey, HI Steph! good to see ya, hope I'm earning lots of bucks for ya!
1 person likes this
@jillmalitz (5131)
• United States
12 Apr 09
That is fascinating! I always loved the history of ancient people and how they evolved.
2 people like this
@scififan43 (2434)
• United States
12 Apr 09
I have looked over the artical allready. It looks very intersteding. jsut reading about this stuff realy gets mindbogging.
@Darkwing (21583)
12 Apr 09
Wow, that's a very interesting article, but maybe just a little misleading? Yes, I'm aware that there are defences in the Scottish cliffs and close to, against the Danes/Vikings and any other marauders from the North Sea, but this was in the extreme south of Scotland... only just over the border in fact, and the Vikings could have approached from England. The reason why I though this is that in the Ice Age there was this adjoining piece of land which is now, obviously corroded away under the sea. This piece of land joined England to Europe, and I believe ran between England's south coast and France, so unless there was another "bridge" of ice or something, in the North Sea, it seems unlikely the Vikings would land directly in Scotland. Having said all that though, I'm sure there were Viking settlements in the south of Scotland, and the weapons in the original article to the one you've linked, show at least one very likely weapon, and some other, archaeological pictures. Brightest Blessings my friend.
@Darkwing (21583)
12 Apr 09
Yes, I'm sorry... it's just that I always associate Vikings with Danes and Germanic people. I was reading up on that area of North Sea that they call Doggerland. It not only mentions how the sea gradually covered that up and the artifacts trawled from the area, but also, the link in the south. I thought you might be interested.... http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.archaeology/2008-07/msg00136.html
2 people like this
12 Apr 09
Thanks Darkwing, that was a very interesting article which I enjoyed reading. It's facinating to see how modern technology is being used to recreate a lost landscape.
3 people like this
12 Apr 09
That was long before the Vikings (about 13000 years before in fact) During the last ice age, practically the whole of the north sea was dry land because as the ice caps spread, the sea level fell due to the immense amounts of water being locked up in the ice. The the article says that the tools show simularities with tools belonging to a culture which existed in the region of what is now Denmark and North Germany and that the people who left them, may have come from that region.
2 people like this
@BarBaraPrz (51818)
• St. Catharines, Ontario
12 Apr 09
Maybe I missed it, but I don't think the article stated how the find was made.
1 person likes this
12 Apr 09
I think that it was by someone spotting a flint on the surface of the field. Many archaeological sites are found just by people walking over a ploughed field looking for artifacts lying on the surface. I have done that myself, it's called "field walking" usually one finds shards of pottery in on the soil, a concentration of which would indicate a settlement of some kind, for the earlier periods, Neolithic and Mesolithic, people look for worked flints. The best thing that I found when doing this was a Bronze Age axe which was just lying on the surface of the ground.
2 people like this
@ElicBxn (64169)
• United States
12 Apr 09
What jw says is true, even in the fossil "biz" for dinosaurs they just look around until they find a site to start a dig. "Lucy" was first discovered by someone walking and looking for fossils. There are Anasazi sites in the southwest that are only "walked" not yet excavated.
@BarBaraPrz (51818)
• St. Catharines, Ontario
12 Apr 09
Wow! Bronze Age, huh?
1 person likes this
@raydene (9871)
• United States
12 Apr 09
Hello Sweets Interesting article. I have a bit of Scot's blood running through my veins so when I see Scotland I perk up. It's amazing it wasn't found prior to now! xoxoxoxoxo
2 people like this
12 Apr 09
Hi Elic, This fasinatating, you learn sonething everyday. Tamara
@Canellita (12029)
• United States
12 Apr 09
Interesting information you have shared with us. I find it amazing that some lost object can be unearthed and scientists are able to tell how old it is.
1 person likes this