Did The Soldiers at Abu-Graib Get a Raw Deal?
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
April 22, 2009 3:35am CST
This is something I've been thinking about for a long time, since the story first broke in fact. The pictures and videos of the Abu Graib prisoners being naked and stacked up, being put on a leash like a dog, etc. were disgusting and I had to admit it appeared that some of the soldiers doing it seemed to be getting some enjoyment from it but I had a feeling they didn't come up with all their ideas on their own, they'd gotten orders from far above them. Not surprisingly though there were no commanding officers charged or put in prison, only the enlisted men and one woman who even happened to be pregnant at the time. What are all your thoughts on this? Were the right military personnel brought to justice and given the proper punishment or should some heads from above have rolled?
Annie
4 people like this
9 responses
@cortney09 (1345)
• United States
23 Apr 09
This is really a topic that gets me really worked up. So, for me it's best not to say anything cause I think once I started talking, I couldn't stop.
1 person likes this
@cortney09 (1345)
• United States
25 Apr 09
Okay, I am not saying what the soldiers did was right, but at the same time I think people need to stop and think about what the prisoners have done. I am all for those soldiers. I really do think people came down on them way to hard, but yet you here nothing about the prisoners and all about the soldiers.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
22 Apr 09
Now I would not call what they did torture. But I will say it was not right and in very bad taste. It hurt the credibility of this country a lot when all those pictures came out.
As for why you did not see more higher ups heads roll. Well it is simple.....it was never put into writing. It is called plausable deniablity. All the soliders could say was they were told to do it. But they did not have any proof. The higher ups denied knowing anything about it. Therefore only the ones who htey had real proof on (those pictures) were ever punished.
Also just to let you know the whole "I was ordered to do it" arguement did not work for those people. YOu know why? These is a rule in the military that says no solider will follow an order that is illegal. IF they feel an order is illegal than they have the right to not follow that order plus go as high as needed to in the military to inform about the illegal order and to keep anything from happening to them for tell. THey failed to do that. THey followed the order and now they are the ones paying the price.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Apr 09
They may have the right to question or not follow an order they feel is illegal but how many do that or, to take it a bit further, how many go beyond telling one person and being told it is legal and to just do it? As for proof of who gave the orders, if someone higher up did so, if there had been any I have no doubt it would have been destroyed the minute those pictures came out.
Annie
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
22 Apr 09
They actually cover it big time in basic training and in other training courses they take. IN this case they should have NOT followed the order. The rule was put into place for situations just like this. Those situations may not happen often but soliders need to be able to idenify those situations and act correctly. Because you just saw what happens when they dont.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
23 Apr 09
Although I can't say as that I have any great sympathy for those soldiers, I don't think the torture started with them or with their immediate commanding officers, at least one of whom was demoted.
I was listening to John McCain on TV this morning giving lame excuses for why those in Washington who originated the policy of torture should not be punished. He of all people, should know better. It looks like once again the top level perpetrators waltz away unscathed while those on the front line bear the entire blame. Sort of the same as what happened on Wall Street, isn't it?
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
25 Apr 09
To me McCain's most shining moment during the Presidential campaign was when, in the one GOP debate, he spoke out so passionately against torture. There was no doubt in my mind at that moment that he DID "know better" when it came to torture and its effectiveness and the fact that it's wrong, wrong, WRONG for us to use it.
This story isn't going to go away anytime soon, I'm afraid. I didn't have any sympathy for those soldiers, especially in the beginning, but I always suspected there was more to it than we were being told. Now I feel that if that young woman who spent her pregnancy behind bars and the young man who still has six years to go on a ten year sentence deserve their punishment there are plenty of people far superior to them in rank and position who deserve worse.
Annie
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
22 Apr 09
I think you have to consider did the treatment they would have had had they been regular prisoners would have worked. So would have keeping them in isolation, feeding them bread and water, and what goes on to hardened criminals in a regular US Penitentiary or even how convicts were treated who disobeyed the rules would have been in Alcatraz. Remember we are talking about men and women who believe that by they are going to be in paradise, well anyway the men would with a lot of virgins.
Also were they regular soldiers wearing regular uniforms, or were they dressed in civilian clothes, in other words, were they spies.
AS for who is responsible, I used to watch a lot of horror and I could come up with some very gruesome ideas of torture, so the commanding officer told them to do what they can to get them to talk, and the enlisted men did.
And if you think of the Twin Towers, you may do things that you would not do otherwise.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Apr 09
This has nothing to do with the Twin Towers, nothing whatsoever. I don't even think they were trying to get those prisoners "to talk" and the fact is many of the prisoners who had been held at Abu-Graib were later released and not charged with anything, I believe including some of those who had been in the photos. If you've seen the photos you'd know they were in uniform, not plain clothes.
As it turns out the former commander at Abu-Graib, retired Brig. General Janis Karpinski, herself a scapegoat, just appeared on TV and she believes the young solders got a raw deal. The one is still in prison as we speak. There has been some new information since I started this discussion which I haven't had the chance to go through completely just yet. Stay tuned.
Annie
@dloveli (4366)
• United States
23 Apr 09
I dont know all the specifics but from what I do know, It doesnt seem possible that they would have been able to come up with these things all on their own. If you really think about it, most of these soldiers are young kids that come from small towns all across the US. Unless everyone involved all suffer from homicidal tendencies (which I doubt)someone with experience in war and torture tactics was choreographing this scene. In the end it just shows how loyal fellow soldiers superiors and peers are. Isnt their supposed to be a certain code of loyalty. Most of the people that I know who served have all said the same things. No one goes to the bathroom without being given the order from an officer. They were coached. dl
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Apr 09
Here's a new report from the Senate Armed Services Committee that sheds a great deal of light on this incident. I'm still studying through it but I think it's proof the soldiers at Abu-Graib didn't act on their own.
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:pVH4vjQ0Ew4J:levin.senate.gov/newsroom/supporting/2008/Detainees.121108.pdf+levin+report+torture&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Annie
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
22 Apr 09
I have to agee with lil...there was no proof that the military personnel charged were ordered to do what they did and they did have the right to object and to refuse to participate in any activities they perceived to be illegal. I agree with you that, in the videos, they seemed to be enjoying themselves and that was the hard evidence that convicted them.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Apr 09
That's for sure, the argument that they were ordered to do it didn't hold nearly as much water after seeing the smirks on the face of Lindy Englund in particular. I hate to judge people without knowing them but I have to admit she didn't come across as the most likable person in the world, did she?
Having never been in the military I know I could be wrong but I've always assumed nothing is done by lower ranking soldiers that hasn't been ordered by someone above them.
Annie
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
22 Apr 09
I have always thought that those soldiers were "damned if they did and damned if they didn't". I also have thought that it really makes us look bad a nation because we were there destroying a nation to promote "freedoms and liberty" and yet we were just as bad as the dictator ruling the country.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Apr 09
I found it quite ironic that we were claiming to have liberated the Iraqi people but there were photos of our troops treating them literally like dogs. I know what those few soldiers did was not indicative of all our troops but it sure didn't do anything for our image, did it?
Annie
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
22 Apr 09
You are 100% correct that these officers were the scape goats for the commanding officers, who where hiding the fact that these tactics were common place in CIA interogations. Barack Obama, should order the justice department to reopen this case, and investigate who should really be in jail. I was so upset with Colin Powell for not standing up for these soldiers, I am sure that he knew the truth, and he should have came out and supported them instead of going along with the company line.
1 person likes this
@ada547612 (203)
• China
23 Apr 09
I think, the right of the military personnel should be brought to justice, and to impose appropriate penalties, or some responsible person should be introduced from above. No matter what the prisoners are cruel treatment, it is he deserves it, each person must act for their own price to pay. Maybe this is the price he should pay.








