News sites swap Obama's birthplace like magic

This is seriously disturbing. Obama is a big fat liar and a con artist in all aspects of his life and his job as president. But I heard he makes some kick asss koolaid, I mean he must, so many people are drinking it.

Yes I was reading that too on HUman Events and what gets me that his grandma says he was born in Kenya I think she should know most dont you!?

Any critical thinker knows, when facts contradict each other, keep looking for the truth. Anyone with a brain knows, when someone is spending vast amounts of time, energy and money trying to keep something from the public... there is a reason. I had to show my long form birth certificate to join the Army. McCain had to "prove" his eligibility to Congress. What is it about Obama's meglomania that he thinks he is above such things.

Don't you realize it that this is racism in all its ugly forms - not beating up people physically, but glorifying and saying that someone is always right, and always tell the truth because he is black and especially because he is to the far left politically speaking. So Obama is always right. Obama will say he was born an American citizen even if he was really born in Kenya and his sweet old grandmother witnessed the birth and there were cameras and videos at the actual event.

You know, I heard on television that the four countries whose government controls the media the most, are China, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. I am not saying we will ever get that bad, no way. But the media, which is mostly liberal, is so happy to do whatever they think is best for Obama's administration. I've never seen such a large number of corporations and people kiss one person's behind like this.

There are several disturbing aspects to this. Not only the questions surrounding Obama's birth, but the implications for the utter manipulation of the news, history and fact by established, traditional news sources. A newspaper, once printed, cannot be altered. But web pages can be edited, updated, altered or obliterated. That UPI would change a story printed a year ago - actually go back and edit the news retroactively - is worrisome. I know myself that I have read something on the net, only to later find it has disappeared. But the disappearance of a website is not nearly as dangerous as a manipulation of news, which when done to past news stories, is actually changing history. We often hear that we shouldn't trust Wikipedia, because it is user-content and can be edited and updated by anyone. But there are millions of eyes watching the pages at Wikipedia. Attempts to edit or insert slanted information is reported and deleted or at least marked as being without citation. The Church of Scientology has been banned from Wikipedia because members were editing pages they felt put their organization in a bad light. There are safeguards in the form of millions of users who watch to see what information is included or omitted. But what of the traditional news and information sources? Only that organization itself can update or edit content. How do you know that what you read today is what was originally reported? How can you know they have not edited it to put forth a slanted view or even radically changed the reported facts? What this means is that we cannot trust these sources, if there is no disclosure that pieces have been edited or updated. I saw no indication that UPI attempted to disclose the change in this story on Obama, although Snopes included the info that other news accounts have a different hospital named. As to the birth certificate itself, if Obama wanted to settle any doubt that he was born where he said he was, he would simply authorize the hospital to release those records. That he has not, in light of the numerous law suits and serious questions, makes us think that the document that would allay our fears and put suspicions to bed does not exist.

I would say that this is serious reason for concern. You know that old saying about protesting too much.... If there was not something to hide, then why all the difficulties about providing an actual birth certificate in the first place? It really does make me wonder and I truly believe that it should be investigated to the fullest.

It doesn't really matter were he was born. His mother was a US citizen at the time of his birth therefore he is. Being born in Hawaii makes him an American also. Which hospital is irrelevant.

I have this feeling that this is just a fraction of what is yet to come. However, I must say what goes around comes back around. Just like the Watergate scandal, someone, somewhere in the political realm will get tired of all of the tom foolery and he will get busted for all of his wrong doings. Or AT LEAST that is what I am PRAYING for! After that happens it is up to us as the Voting Public to assure that it does not happen again.

Maybe we entered another dimension where he was born at the one he sent the letter to. Next stop, Kenya? What I can't understand is why, snopes was made the last word anyway...it's run by a husband and wife team and merely copies from other sites what THEY put out as true. Snopes just lost all credibility as far as I'm concerned. They caved in to someone's pressure. Did you know the STOP THE SMEARS site is gone, no archives, nothing! hhhhhmmmmm???? What people need to do is look at ALL the information out there and weigh it for themselves...for instance: listen to or read all of Obama's speeches from when he entered public service til now and find all the lies he's told - when he messes up and forgets what he said before. OH! That would make a great video game, see how many you could spot as you weave your way from Illinois to D.C....Liar, liar..pants on fire!