ANOTHER GOP Lie?? Jackie Robinson, "Famous Republican"?
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
October 14, 2009 3:02pm CST
There's a page on the GOP website entitled "American Heroes and Famous Repubicans" where they tell about some famous African-American and Hispanic Americans who also happened to be Repubicans. One of them is below:
Jackie Robinson
In 1947, Jackie Robinson became the first African-American to play major league baseball in the United States, as a first baseman for the Brooklyn Dodgers. Not only was he a great athlete, Jackie Robinson was also a great Republican. He campaigned for Richard Nixon's presidential campaign in 1960 and then supported Nelson Rockefeller (R-NY) for the Republican nomination in 1964. Robinson worked as a special assistant in Governor Rockefeller’s administration.
The general manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers, Branch Rickey, who hired Jackie Robinson, was also a Republican. The Missouri Republican Party later offered Rickey the nomination for Governor and Senator, but he preferred baseball to politics.
(End of excerpt)
http://www.gop.com/index.php//learn/heroes/jackie_robinson-1/
The only problem is, Robinson was NOT a Republican. Below is what he said in 1959:
“I guess you’d call me an independent since I’ve never identified myself with one party or another in politics.”
Later, following the 1964 RNC Convention, he had this to say:
That convention was one of the most unforgettable and frightening experiences of my life. The hatred I saw was unique to me because it was hatred directed against a white man. It embodied a revulsion for all he stood for, including his enlightened attitude towards black people.
A new breed of Republicans had taken over the GOP. As I watched this steamroller operation in San Francisco, I had a better understanding of how it must have felt to be a Jew in Hitler’s Germany.
(End of excerpt)
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/republican-national-committee/new-rnc-website-claims-jackie-robinson-as-gop-hero-but-he-was-an-indy-condemned-gops-racial-tactics/
Robinson DID help Richard Nixon and later worked for Nelson Rockefeller's campaign but I don't think there's any question that he would NOT be comfortable in today's GOP, which wouldn't welcome Nelson Rockefeller for one second!
Any thoughts?
Annie
1 person likes this
5 responses
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Oct 09
yeah, it's hard to pinpoint the exact party of historic figures. Someone may have assumed he was a republican because he helped campaign for some. Also, your point about the party then and now is a valid one. Nelson Rockefeller might not be any more comfortable in today's Republican party as JFK would be in today's Democrat party.
Another intereting historical falsehood is the party Dan White (the guy who killed Harvey Milk). A lot of supporters of Harvey Milk Day have wrongly stated that he was a Republican.. but he was a lifelong Democrat.
1 person likes this
@starsailover (7829)
• Mexico
14 Oct 09
Hi ParaTed: In the political world of every country sometimes it's really difficult to identify the membership of a person to a party. There are some people that change their ideologies in some periods of their lives
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Oct 09
true, but the parties also change their ideologies with their underwear.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
18 Oct 09
Gee, that's strange that anyone would think Milk had been a Republican! I can see how people may have assumed that about Robinson since he did work for Nixon and Rockefeller but I think it's too bad for the GOP's sake that they didn't do their homework a bit better before using him as one of their minority heroes who were Republicans. I don't really think anyone would have looked at that list and thought, "Who cares about these other people if Jackie Robinson isn't included!", do you?
Annie
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
14 Oct 09
I can't say he'd be any happier with the democratic party either. None of us should be happy with either side.
Personally I like the idea I heard yesterday. Take 935,000,000 and buy off all the congress and senate. To get the money they have to leave office and never run again. Money well spent. 

1 person likes this

@anniepa (27955)
• United States
17 Oct 09
You could be right but the Democratic party hasn't claimed him as one of their own. Our of curiosity, what do you think about your own Senators and representative? I ask because it's often been said that many people say they'd like to "kick them all out" about the REST of Congress but they're happy with their own!
Annie
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
17 Oct 09
Brownback is okay. Sebelius was a horrible governor and we're all glad to see her gone. I liked Dennis Moore better when he was the Assistant Attorney General. He seemed fair-minded.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
14 Oct 09
Found it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c19CrYbud40
1 person likes this

@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
15 Oct 09
Well as usual Annie, you're using a left wing blog as if it were a reliable source. Now I'm not saying the RNC is being honest since they used the common lie that "Jackie Robinson became the first African-American to play major league baseball in the United States" when in fact the first was Bud Fowler over 50 years earlier. I don't know why people can't stop spreading the Jackie Robinson lie, but I digress.
As many others have said, both parties have changed. That's just how things go. Frankly, the Republican party isn't even the same party it was in the 90s when one of the platforms was to get rid of the Department of Education. Instead, under Bush and a republican majority they doubled the size of it.
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
14 Oct 09
I am actually more concerned about the lies that are happening now rather than someone who obviously screwed up their research. Besides, Jackie Robinson fame is centered around his physical abilities about baseball not his political affiliation. The GOP now is far different than was in 1964 just like the Democratic Party was far different then than it is now. Things have changed in both parties.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
17 Oct 09
This IS a lie that just happened and the way I see it, if they want to boast of someone as being one of 15 or 16 "American Heroes" who happened to be "great Republicans" they'd at least look at the person's own biography where he made it clear he was NOT a Republican. You're certainly correct that "Besides, Jackie Robinson fame is centered around his physical abilities about baseball not his political affiliation", but you should tell THAT to Michael Steele...lol!
From Robinson's own words it seems like the GOP was beginning to show signs of what they are today back in 1964, which is why he was disillusioned with them. It isn't the party of Nelson Rockefeller anymore especially considering the fact some consider Lindsay Graham a "RINO".
Annie
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
17 Oct 09
Like the democratic party is any better at the moment, but that is besides the point. I will say when I think of Jackie Robinson, I don't think politics. Meaning that his being an Independent has no influence on my political standing. I am not defending shoddy research or the obvious lack of proper vetting. But than again, we are lied to all the time in politics. The difference is the lies the President and Congress are telling are far more damaging to the country than an incomplete assumption made by someone because they read that Jackie Robinson was involved in Republican political activity. Frankly, I never even heard of that particular website until you posted it here. Since the only fact you are disputing is his political affiliation, two out of three isn't that bad. He!! it is a better record than the President's political vetting record.
@jerzgirl (9384)
• United States
15 Oct 09
The GOP fully believes in both "Manifest Destiny" AND "The Ends Justifies The Means", so it's no surprise that they will say anything to get people to come to their side. They know that the most diehard members won't question or fact check anything they say, and they know that others they want to add to their rolls won't either since they mostly target un- or under-educated people.
From his auto-biography comes the following, which immediately precede his comment asbout Hitler's Germany:
[i]I was not as sold on the Republican party as I was on the governor. Every chance I got, while I was campaigning, I said plainly what I thought of the right-wing Republicans and the harm they were doing. I felt the GOP was a minority party in term of numbers of registered voters and could not win unless they updated their social philosophy and sponsored candidates and principles to attract the young, the black, and the independent voter. I said this often from public, and frequently Republican, platforms. By and large Republicans had ignored blacks and sometimes handpicked a few servile leaders in the black community to be their token "nig*gers". How would I sound trying to go all out to sell Republicans to black people? They're not buying. They know better.
I admit freely that I think, live, and breathe black first and foremost. That is one of the reasons I was so committed to the governor and so opposed to Senator Barry Goldwater. Early in 1964 I wrote a Speaking Out piece for The Saturday Evening Post. A Barry Goldwater victory would insure that the GOP would be completely the white man's party. What happened at San Francisco when Senator Goldwater became the Republican standard-bearer confirmed my prediction.
I wasn’t altogether caught of guard by the victory of the reactionary forces in the Republican party, but I was appalled by the tactics they used to stifle their liberal opposition. I was a special delegate to the convention through an arrangement made by the Rockefeller office. That convention was one of the most unforgettable and frightening experiences of my life. The hatred I saw was unique to me because it was hatred directed against a white man. It embodied a revulsion for all he stood for, including his enlightened attitude toward black people.
[/i]http://www.framinghamdems.org/JackRob.html
The only reason he supported any Republican at all was because of that individual candidate's willingness to consider multi-racial thinking. He mainly despised the GOP because they espoused and/or embraced bigotry and racial division.
1 person likes this




