Would Obama try to re - bulid the U.S. economy?
By clorissa123
@clorissa123 (4926)
United States
October 23, 2009 3:40pm CST
There was a rumor saying that, Obama plan to destroy the U.S. economy first, and then he would try to re - build the economy according to his plan. It was a rumor, and I don't really believe 100% of it. But, our government is keeping on printing those dollar bills without enough gold reserve in the U.S. treasury. I still have doubt on our future economy. What is your opinion on this one?
3 people like this
7 responses
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
23 Oct 09
I personally believe that Obama hates The united States and is working to destroy it. He also doesn't like or believe in the constitution as he is trying to destroy it too. He has done nothing but tear us done to countries abroad and has buddies up to dictators. Yes he is trying to tear down the economy so we will be a socialist or communist country..
1 person likes this
@clorissa123 (4926)
• United States
24 Oct 09
He has done more than enough to hurt our economy, and our tax money already. United States is literally gone broke, and we owe too much money to China. And yet, how are we going to pay for all these debt in the near future? We better come up a solution than rely on our great leader "Obama".
1 person likes this
@wlee9696 (595)
• United States
23 Oct 09
This economy has tried to turn around in spite of what Obama has done. But every time it makes progress Obama does something - like printing more money - to knock it back down again. I just don't get it. It appears that he wants the economy to have an epic fail. Then he could build it back into a socialist based economy. What confuses me is that if he let the American dollar fail then what is he going to build the economy back with? I just don't get this guy. I don't understand how he is going to achieve what appears to be his goal of a Socialist country if he utterly destroys it first.
1 person likes this
@clorissa123 (4926)
• United States
24 Oct 09
What he proposed for health care should be embraced by all of us. But going back to a socialist economy, would that be work? Like our counterpart of European countries. Would that be viable solution to our recent problem? We don't know yet. One thing for sure, he is definitely destroying our economy all together.
1 person likes this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
27 Oct 09
President Obama is the front man follow the money. Look at who is around him and advises him. He figures he has only 2 years before he loses the power in congress.
that happen, I hope.
I think he wants to change the country but the American people will not let
@clorissa123 (4926)
• United States
24 Oct 09
It was just a rumor, I am sure whether it is a truth or not yet. But certainly he is destroying it now. We just have to pray for the best for tomorrow. Although we have not reach the depression period. But it would better we can work together to solve this problem as a common community.
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163772)
• Garden Grove, California
24 Oct 09
clorissa the rumors are building as the republicans try to destroy our faith in a president that we including myself voted'
for, some people will say anything to make poor Obama look
like an ogre and I for one do not believe them. Rumors are
unsubstant
iated that is why they are called rumors. I do not believe any such thing. I think he is trying to do the best he can and if more people who voted for him would back him
now it would all be a lot better all the way around. Bush
had 8 years to foul up our economy and you all want Obama to
fix it in one or two years? get real.

iated that is why they are called rumors. I do not believe any such thing. I think he is trying to do the best he can and if more people who voted for him would back him
now it would all be a lot better all the way around. Bush
had 8 years to foul up our economy and you all want Obama to
fix it in one or two years? get real.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
27 Oct 09
Which rumors? I'm interested to know. I haven't really heard any rumors floating around. 

@clorissa123 (4926)
• United States
28 Oct 09
I neither back for Bush, nor Obama. But for the fact as we all can see what he is doing right now. We all losing faith on him. Well, as matter of fact, that is why we vote for a president. And that is why he running for president for. To solve the problem as he promised. That is what our tax money pay for. Or you can run the president too if you want to. If you have better policy, we can all vote for. That is what your job all about.
@JohnJeff (720)
• Malaysia
1 Nov 09
American economy performance will give huge impact on world economy.Any decision made must considered the effects on world economy.I think Obama would not take any high risk.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
24 Oct 09
I think it's a lot bigger than President Obama.
Just like we seen in the past 8 years, and even the 8 before that, to an extent, the President is the guy who takes the fall, bearing the brunt of all ridicule. But with Obama, he has so many likeminded people around him. From the radical czars to his secretaries, most of these people Obama surrounds himself with have ties with radicalism that run contrary to nearly everything America stands for.
It's hard to get a scoop on this stuff. Instead of news networks and papers covering the "why" on Anita Dunn all-but pledging her allegiance to Mao, they cover the "why" on the White House separating and making an enemy out of Fox News.
Instead of covering the "how" on healthcare proposals actually FIXING the problem, the media cover these White House-generated stories about "how" town hall protestors and liberal reform naysayers are everything from astroturf to legitimate enemies of America.
It's a blatant attempt for this administration to control the way they're being covered. And to that, there are only two logical reasons: 1) they're truly that thin-skinned, or 2) they need to create these fictional enemies to keep us misdirected why they put more of the mortar in place to build their monument without anyone questioning what the abundance of materials are for.
I'm leaning toward the latter--Obama trying to rebuild America in general--because the thin-skinned thing is just too easy. They wouldn't actually pick a fight with Fox News or insult regular Americans simply because they can't handle criticism. Picking a fight will create infinitely more criticism! So if one were to assume they were just striking back out of bitterness, that means they're truly stupid people.
No, it's far more likely that it's all misdirection with their attempt to control media. Right now on the news cycle, instead of talking about politics and the President's plans and how he's unable to get a grip on unemployment or deal with Afghanistan, the're still talking about whether it's smart or not to pick a fight with a news organization and subsequently millions of American viewers.
It's all more than a bit fishy -- suspect. It creeps me out to know that this new cult of personality is led by a vindictive manipulator.
ALL Obama "excuses" are now null and void! "Give him time!" Umm, nope. We see what he does with his time. He picks fights with his opposition instead of attempting to handle problems! "Bush!" LOL... nice try, guy! This sh1t is creepier than ANYTHING Bush ever did, especially when you consider that the groundwork of America's catastrophe was laid, in part, by Obama--and other progressives--as a Senator when he voted against regulations for Fanny and Freddie. It's starting to look like his ilk wanted this crisis for their chance to shine! And don't even try to bring in the "Wall St. created it" BS. Obama's government is a business larger and greedier than they'll ever be!
Like I said, Obama takes the brunt, but it's bigger than him. It's Obama plus many more who share his ideology who are trying to rebuild America. And the MOST distrubing aspect is that they do not want to do it out in the open. They won't present it as if it's a good idea, eligible for honest debate. Instead, they distract people and try to bring in the "change" under the cover of night.
How is anyone supposed to trust them!? Obama supporters? Can you ease my mind? How am I to trust this kind of stuff?







