First Democrat Since Civil War Wins New York 23rd!!!  |
| |
| So much for the power of Sarah Palin and the rest of the far right tea party crowd! They managed to push the GOP nominee out of the race and they thought they had it made then with their Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, who it just so happened doesn't even LIVE within the district and was found in an interview to be NOT at all knowledgeable about it. Some of the right-wing pundits are spinning the results of tonights' races as horrible news for President Obama and the Democrats and great news for the conservative wing of the GOP but I have to respectfully disagree. The truth is, NO candidate who ran as an ultra-conservative won tonight. Bob McDonnell, now Virginia's governor-elect, may have his sexist and homophobic thesis in his past but he ran as a moderate and didn't go negative, unlike his opponent. The winner in the New Jersey Governor's race is also a moderate and, from what I've heard, ran a clean and positive campaign was well. The Democrats didn't have good candidates for the two gubernatorial races they lost, simple as that! Corzine wasn't very popular, my own very liberal brother isn't too crazy about him, and Virginia's Creigh Deeds was just a bad candidate all the way around. There's also that little thing known as history in Virginia; call it coincidence if you'd like but it's been over 30 years that candidate from the opposite party of the President has been elected governor of that state. Exit polls in both Virginia and New Jersey showed that only one out of five voters said their vote had anything at all to do with the President and out of that half said it affected them positively and half said negatively. Basically, there was a low turnout and those who supported Obama in 2008 failed to show up this year, something that isn't at all surprising. Off-year elections rarely do have very good turnouts. OK, now it's your turn to put the spin on it! Annie | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
1. kennyrose (5047)
|
3 years ago
| | Well one thing for certain them elected by the peopel tonigth could not be any worse then who is in office now. | | | | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Rose, are you saying the DEMOCRAT that won in the NY 23rd is better than the REPUBLICAN he replaced...lol? Annie | | | |
| |
| Democrat Elizabeth Warren Elizabeth Warren fights for Middle Class Families. Join her today. ElizabethWarren.com/ | add comment | | |
|
|
2. Taskr36 (6785)
|
3 years ago
| | I think it's funny how the New York 23rd is such a big deal to you while you act as though the other races were meaningless. I guess a race only means something if a democrat wins it. I think it's unfortunate that an independent didn't get the win with the New York 23rd. Frankly, I'd rather Owens win than the fake republican that the GOP wasted over $900,000 promoting. I also think it's funny that you mock the power of Sarah Palin to get people elected, when everyone that Obama just stooped for failed miserably. I'd say that is a "so much for the power of Obama and the far left socialist crowd". Aside from Owens, this was a clean sweep of democrats losing elections. Sure, it's an off year, but New Jersey is a far left state so it's still a pretty big deal that the incumbent democrat lost so bad. I watched Obama campaign for him and it was pathetic. Obama was claiming Corzine needed a chance to "clean up the mess". I guess Obama was too stupid to realize that Corzine was the incumbent. The "mess" happened on his watch. | | | | | | |
kennyrose (5047)
|
3 years ago
| | taskr. i think tonigth the american people but the democrates on notice,the american people sent a message to washington d.c. not on party ties but for the good of the american people and our country and i'm very proud of them all for doing the rigth thing for the coutry. hell hillary clinton lost big time last year first time a women has run for office of presisdent and the democrates kicked her to the curb for a chicago community organizer who has never held a legal job in his 47 year's,so what dose that tell a person?far as the new york race othr then doug hoffman there was no one to vote for that would be good for the country unelss owens is a moderate democrate, the gop gal was a sorry joke she may as well be a liberal democrate and join them destroying what is left of our country. no one obama courted won they all was washed up thanks to them selfs good riddens to them all. | | | |
kennyrose (5047)
|
3 years ago
| | i just posted a late night news artical saying voting machines broke downh during todays election.the court has ordered them impound so i wonder do they really know who won the 23 district for certain? | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Rose, in the two races that sent someone to Washington Democrats were elected! Taskr, I didn't say any particular race was or was NOT a big deal to me. You're wrong about Owens being the only Democrat to win! Were you unaware of the special Congressional race in a conservative California district which was won by a Democrat? If the GOP expected to get a jump on regaining power in the House they must be quite disappointed. Regarding Palin, the two Republicans who won had turned down her offers of stomping for them. What does THAT tell you...lol? "...so much for the power of Obama and the far left socialist crowd"... Hmmm, isn't it interesting that the Democrat candidate for Virginia governor, Creigh Deeds, had vowed to opt out of any public option that may get passed in health care reform? I think the President may have helped Corzine a little bit, not enough but somewhat just the same since he was trailing by 30 points in the summer and came back to within single digits. He wasn't very popular, my own VERY liberal brother lives in NJ and isn't at all impressed with him but the "mess" the state's in has existed for quite some time, it isn't ALL Corzine's doing! Annie | | | |
| |
| Creditbad credit Financingbad credit fastyourtr.com | add comment | | |
|
|
3. ZephyrSun (3727)
|
3 years ago
| | I really haven't been watching this race all that closely, I read where Palin was helping the conservative and the Republican that dropped out was endorsing the Democrat. That must be a very conservative area because the Civil War was so long ago LOL | | | | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Apparently the district had been "trending to the left" in recent years. Did you notice how the conservatives are sssoooo angry that Scozzafava dropped out and backed the Democrat, but if a Democrat backs a Republican (like Lieberman for McCain) he's just following his conscience? Annie | | | |
ZephyrSun (3727)
|
3 years ago
| | Good for my guy, not for your guy LOL | | | |
| |
| Campaign Materials Bumper stickers, t-shirts, posters, mugs and more. Get involved. www.BalanceAmerica.com | add comment | | |
|
|
4. Troublegum (433)
|
3 years ago
| | I've given up trying to spin results. At the end of the day people elected who they elected and following the trends of who won what as an indicator of who wins next time is kind of useless because generally it is the actions of the person that influence the next elextion most. By way of example, GW Bush getting two wins in a row didn't trend us toward the conservatives, what eneded up happening is that his international policy ticked off the left and his domestic policy ticked off the right, and his actions ended up having a ripple effect through the next election cycle because the left was fired up against him and the right wasn't fire up for him. I don't know much about NY23 other than the the fact that the GOP sunk a huge amount of cash into a very left leaning republican who turned out to be a democrat, and a conservitive guy without the support of his party gave them a run for their money. To me if I had to spin this I would say we are seeing a move away from the leadership of BOTH parties. | | | | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | I sincerely hope we DO see an emergence of other parties in the near future. I think that's the only way we'll get TRUE campaign finance reform while at the same time to get GOOD third party candidates we'll need reform otherwise we'll just end up with independently wealthy, out of touch candidates who don't happen to be either Democrats or Republicans and what will we gain from that? Annie | | | |
Troublegum (433)
|
3 years ago
| | Unfortunately third parties are not really viable in our system, but what we are seeing is that in general the populus is more conservative than the governing parties. The Liberals are not quite as liberal as the Obama/Reed/Palosi trio and the Conservatives are more conservative than McCain and most of the other Republicans that seem to rise to the surface. I think we are about to witness a purging from both parties where the leaders more accurately represent the people. Whichever party can get their purge straightened out first will gain/remain in control. | | | |
| |
| Buy Patriotic Candies Great for Republicans or Democrats Free Shipping & Wholesale Prices www.CandyFavorites.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| |
| |
| Web Sites for Hedge Funds Professional websites desiged to meet the requirements of hedge funds. www.completehedge.com | add comment | | |
|
|
6. xfahctor (7623)
|
3 years ago
| | WOw, you really don't get it do you. This is not the story out of this at all. Here is the story in this.... A third party candidate for Congress knocks one major party entirely out of the face and by a very narow margin almost over takes the other major party. And all this after a very late entery in to the race, with not even a very suave or experienced candidate. THAT is what happened in New York yesterday annie, The story isn't about Palin, or Obama, or, sorry, even Democrats, it's an omen for both parties in next years congressional elections. And I can't helpbut wonder what would have happened had the 6% or so that went to a candidate that dropped out the day before, many of which may have been absentee ballots, before she dropped out. **Special note** The people of New Yorks 23rd district didn't really have a choice in this race in the beginning anyway before the conservative party. The NY state republican party picked a democrat to run for them. They had a Democrat, or a Demcrat to choose from, albight one of those Democrats had an R next to their name. | | | | | | |
Taskr36 (6785)
|
3 years ago
| | You know, I still would have rooted for the third party even if it were some Green candidate just to get someone in there that wasn't beholden to a big party. As you said though, it was two democrats and one had an R next to her name. She proved that by endorsing a democrat. | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Taskr, to you first - "As you said though, it was two democrats and one had an R next to her name. She proved that by endorsing a democrat." Tell me AGAIN what you think of Joe Lieberman and his endorsement of McCain and his promise to filibuster a vote on health care reform as well as to help some Republicans campaign next year. Or is that "different"? Now to X - "Here is the story in this.... A third party candidate for Congress knocks one major party entirely out of the face and by a very narrow margin almost over takes the other major party. And all this after a very late entry in to the race, with not even a very suave or experienced candidate. THAT is what happened in New York yesterday annie..."...NOT QUITE!! You make it seem as if there were a totally unknown third party candidate who SINGLEHANDEDLY knocked the Republican out of the race. That is NOT what happened at all and you know it! Had it not been for first Palin's endorsement (on Facebook of all things!) then the other wingnuts jumping into the fray we'd have heard very little about this race and Scozzafava probably would have won. Annie | | | |
Troublegum (433)
|
3 years ago
| | Glad the wingnuts jumped in. Because as it turns out the wignuts are the majority in our country who are sick of political calculations designed for political victory rather than for the good of the people that the politicians represent. Had Scazafava won it would have proved that political calculation works for maintaining party prowis. The election turning on its head shows that if you reject the will of the people their is a political price to pay. | | | |
| |
| Mutual Fund Invest In Money Market Mutual Funds. See Exclusive Online Offers Today. firstcountybank.com | add comment | | |
|
|
7. Rollo1 (2827)
|
3 years ago
| | I am still reeling from your spin which I guess amounts to saying that the Democrats who didn't win were poor candidates with ineffective campaign strategy and the ones who did win were simply better than the other guy and even if a lot of Democrats lost it doesn't mean that people didn't agree with them, just not enough liberals vote during an off-year election. Well, guess that's their loss then, huh? A third party, conservative candidate took 45% of the vote. That's a real number. Had Scozzafava endorsed the conservative candidate, he would have probably won. She threw some votes over to Owens with her endorsement. It's unconscionable for anyone to endorse one candidate over another because of a personal temper tantrum, but what can you do? It's nice that you can have one win in the face of all the other losses. Oh, I know, they don't mean anything. The fact that Obama campaigned heavily for the loser in NJ means nothing. In fact, nothing means anything and in the world of politics, almost anything can mean nothing. Better gear up. You're going to have a lot of losses to spin in 2010. | | | | | | |
xfahctor (7623)
|
3 years ago
| | gonna be a quiet day here on mylot nov 4th 2010....real quiet. | | | |
| |
| |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Thank you, Artistry, you're too kind! Trust me, the others (with the possible exception of X!) who have participated in this particular response don't like me or my posts. They think they can ridicule me and make everyone think I'm stupid and don't know what I'm talking about...lol! That's OK, I'm not going to stop posting my views. Rollo1, I'd like to respectfully ask you something. You wrote, "It's unconscionable for anyone to endorse one candidate over another because of a personal temper tantrum." I saw where Scozzafava had said she decided to endorse the candidate who was closer to her own views. Of course, many members of the party that had chosen here as the nominee had abandoned her and run attack ads against her as well. Does that sound just a LITTLE familiar to you? Remember Joe Lieberman? Did you consider him to have endorsed and campaigned for McCain because of a "personal temper tantrum" about his primary loss the 2006 or is THAT different because only conservatives follow their consciences and do what they believe to be the right thing? Annie | | | |
matersfish (2668)
|
3 years ago
| | So, even when annip admits it's "spin" some still call it fact? Interesting. Anniep in 2012!! | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Matersfish, what should I run for? Do I have to move and if so, PLEASE let it be to a warmer climate!! And, will you be my campaign manager? Annie | | | |
Rollo1 (2827)
|
3 years ago
| | I would say that Scozzafava may have chosen the candidate closest to her views, but not the one whose views were closest to the party she belongs to and purported to represent as a candidate. If she doesn't believe in the basic tenets of the party platform, she probably should choose another party or become an independent. She took $900G from the Republican party to run her campaign and then endorsed a Democrat. Doubt they will fund her as a candidate for anything ever again. | | | |
| |
| Best Anti Aging Products Find The Best Anti Aging Products. Match Products To Your Skin Type. agingaware.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | I'm looking forward to it too! Annie | | | |
| |
| 5 Growth Stocks for 2012 Discover Your Best Opportunities For Safe Portfolio Growth. www.insideinvestingdaily.com | add comment | | |
|
|
9. ParaTed2k (6360)
|
3 years ago
| | I guess Hillary made it chic to not be from the district in which you run. ;~D All the pre-election rhetoric aside, it comes as no surprise to me that the Democrat won here. The Republican vote was always mostly behind Hoffman (RNC backing aside), but the Democrat vote was split between the two liberals in the race. Scozzafava dropping out made it so everyone left of center had one candidate to back. It is great to see this much interest in such a low priority election though. | | | | | | |
ParaTed2k (6360)
|
3 years ago
| | It should also be pointed out that, even after the double teaming and him being pretty much an unknown, Hoffman only lost by 3%... pretty pathetic for the Rs and the Ds. | | | |
xfahctor (7623)
|
3 years ago
| | and THATS the story in this whole story. | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | Well, Ted, I get your point but "carpetbagging" has been a fairly common occurrence, hasn't it? At least Hillary DID establish residence within the state of New York, which was all she was required to do, and apparently enough residents of the state to elect her didn't mind that she hadn't lived there very long. I think Elizabeth Dole did something similar; her husband lost a Presidential election and left office as a Senator from Kansas and she runs for the Senate representing North Carolina! Now, tell me, who had ever even HEARD of HOffman before Palin's endorsement? Annie | | | |
Rollo1 (2827)
|
3 years ago
| | The media would show up to see Palin get a pedicure, so say what you want about her endorsements, she may very well be the reason this particular race got national attention. | | | |
| |
| Money Market Rates See today's Money Markets from 100s of Banks. Plus news, calcs, tips. www.BankRate.com | add comment | | |
|
|
10. artistry (1857)
|
3 years ago
| | ...Hi annie, This is the race people should be analyzing. It looks as if the White House planned this from the time they took the moderate Republican Congressman from the district, and gave him a position in the administration. Although I'm sure they didn't, but how strange. They kicked the Republican woman out, she then endorsed the Democrat, and you find out that the Conservative guy the Republicans favored, knew nothing about the district he was running to represent and didn't even live there, which should have disqualified him. Leaving the Democrat to dance on into the seat, I love it. Amazing these games people play, now there will be some kind of redistricting where the Democrat will supposedly have the seat forever, however that is going to work. Interesting to say the least. Take it easy. | | | | | | |
Taskr36 (6785)
|
3 years ago
| | "Although I'm sure they didn't, but how strange." No, the White House knew exactly what they were doing. Obama did his best to get Republicans in his administration that would leave openings for democrats to fill. It's not uncommon and I thought it was common knowledge that this was his goal. As for the conservative not living in or knowing the district, that never bothered democrats when Hillary did it to get her senate seat. | | | |
artistry (1857)
|
3 years ago
| | .... Taskra, I hope I spelled your name correctly, I didn't write it down, apologies if wrong. The only thing wrong with that plan is that the district is heavily Republican, as I understand it, so how in the world would a Democrat be expected to win?? Doesn't make any sense. | | | |
xfahctor (7623)
|
3 years ago
| | " so how in the world would a Democrat be expected to win" simple.....by running two democrats. | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
3 years ago
| | The district is expected to "disappear" after the 2010 Census and it will be absorbed into the surrounding districts by what they call "gerrymandering", all of which are heavily Democratic. The party in power in the House gets to redraw the districts but if it goes it really won't much matter who does it, I don't think. I LOVED how D1ck Armey did a total 180 and tossed Hoffman under the bus in so doing! He'd said it was "too parochial" to be concerned that Hoffman knew nothing about the district but afterwards he changed his tune and blamed the loss on Hoffman for not being more knowledgeable...lol! By the way, again I'll say that Hillary DID live in NY and when you run for the Senate you can live anywhere in the state. As I recall, she'd gotten the support of some Republicans and independents, not just Democrats. Annie | | | |
| |
| Mutual Funds Learn about the Top Performing Mutual Funds, Today! ssgaFunds.com/MutualFunds | add comment | | |
|
|
| | Buy Patriotic Candies Great for Republicans or Democrats Free Shipping& Wholesale Prices www.CandyFavorites.com
| Web Sites for Hedge Funds Professional websites desiged to meet the requirements of hedge funds. www.completehedge.com
| Mutual Fund Invest In Money Market Mutual Funds. See Exclusive Online Offers Today. firstcountybank.com
|
|
| |
| |
| |