Nobody believed me, but I was right! Santorum is the media's new frontrunner!
By Taskr36
@Taskr36 (13963)
United States
December 29, 2011 11:09am CST
Bachman only had to win one straw poll to be a frontrunner. Herman Cain only had to win one. Newt Gingrich just had to some in 2nd to be a frontrunner and now, as ONLY I PREDICTED, Rick Santorum is now being treated as a frontrunner not for coming in first, or second, but THIRD in a poll!
Now that the media is pretending he's a frontrunner who thinks his poll numbers are about to rise as the "anyone but Romney" candidate?
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/rick-santorum-gets-a-big-polling-boost-goes-after-ron-paul/
http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/12/rick-santorum-surges-in-iowa-poll-lays-into-ron-paul/
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-12-28/gop-santorum-surges-gingrich-fades-iowa/52260172/1
4 people like this
9 responses
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
30 Dec 11
I find it n odd coincidence that shortly before his poll bump, a few news channels started mentioning his name in connection with terms like "dark horse" and "Iowa surprise" and such. Almost the very next day after they started doing this, the Iowa GOP announces it was going to now be tallying the caucus resort at an "undisclosed location". Now we have a few polls out there with Santorum making a bit of a climb.
I am going to go one further than you and make the perhaps paranoid, conspiratorial prediction that Santorum is going to "win" (wink wink nudge nudge) Iowa.
I am going to go one further than you and make the perhaps paranoid, conspiratorial prediction that Santorum is going to "win" (wink wink nudge nudge) Iowa.1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
1 Jan 12
I don't think this country will EVER elect a right-wing extremist like him, at least I sure HOPE they never do. Did you hear where he said people can statistically guarantee they'll never be poor by doing two things - graduating from high school and getting married.
WTF????
Annie
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
4 Mar 12
IF Santorum is a right wing 'extremist' as you say, why not elect him? A LEFT wing extremist was elected?
And he's refering to a study done by Brookings Institute fellow William Galston on how to avoid poverty:
William Galston, a former adviser to President Clinton and scholar at the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution, devised that lucid, easy to follow anti-poverty formula, and the data back him up. Fewer than 10 percent of families that follow his blueprint live in poverty, while 79 percent of those who don't follow the three-step plan end up poor.
Here is a link to William Galston's bio, I know you won't except an expert from the right; and a link to a discussion on the issue.
http://www.brookings.edu/experts/galstonw.aspx
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697491/posts

@rogue13xmen13 (14402)
• United States
29 Dec 11
It seems like media is predicting this race, but it looks like everyone has a different candidate that they see as being the forerunner for the GOP.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
29 Dec 11
Well Gingrich's numbers have been dropping fast, as they did with every other media-picked front-runner. Over the last two weeks they've had to grudgingly admit that Ron Paul is actually doing well and they've been desperate to find someone else to call a front-runner. I'd hoped it could have been Huntsman, but they're probably trying to choose people less likely to beat Obama in a general election.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
29 Dec 11
You're right, Taskr, I have to give you this one! I know I didn't expect Santorum to ever be anything but an after-thought, someone in LOW single digits with no prayer of placing in the top five anywhere, including my own state!
I do take issue with you just a LITTLE bit since the other candidates you referred to DID lead some polls at the time they were being called the "frontrunners". I don't personally give any credence to straw polls since only the most die-hard political activists generally participate in them but the telephone polls are slightly more credible. I still don't see how even a couple thousand potential voters out of millions can determine how the entire country will vote. It's all in how the questions are asked and whether the respondents give honest answers.
Annie @Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
29 Dec 11
You're right that some of the flavor of the week frontrunners won at least one poll first, but Gingrich didn't. His frontrunner coverage started when he moved into second place. Rick Perry wasn't even in the race, much less winning polls, when they called him a frontrunner. That's largely the reason he entered the race. He did well too until he opened his mouth.
To be fair this coverage is still fresh so I can't guarantee he'll lead in a poll, but I fully expect him too. The main reason I posted it now is because, as with Gingrich, many people don't realize that he was being called a frontrunner BEFORE he won any polls.
1 person likes this
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
30 Dec 11
I think we should wait and see. The polls I have seen all show Ron Paul in Second and could easily take Iowa which if it goes that way his campaign will get a big boost even if the Main Stream media doesn't want him to.
I have to ask do people still care about what the mainstream media actually thinks. I mean really do people care. I go and look at them to find out what is happening which generally requires me to look to find the actual story because the Main Stream media while not lying put their views into it. I generally try to avoid this but well as a Political Commentator myself it is pretty much impossible.
Santorum will be the frontrunner of running last.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
30 Dec 11
Well people listened to the media when it told them Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, and Perry were frontrunners. I have no reason to believe the public will wise up now. this one is a bit scary though since it's closer to the primaries. The media struggles to keep people supporting manufactured frontrunners for too long, but they might be able to keep this going just long enough to get Santorum good numbers in Iowa.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
1 Jan 12
Well I can't vote in the Republican Primary and I can tell you if they pick Santorum to win the Nomination I won't vote for him but the Libertarian candidate who I hope will be Gary Johnson as that is who I am going to support in the 2012 primaries in my state of Oregon.
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
31 Dec 11
Taskr, if you could find your name on a straw poll ballet you too could be the front runner. The problem is that there is no real front runner, and the only guy that has a shot of beating Obama is Romney, but NO BODY LIKES HIM!!!! So now what do you do? I don't know.

@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
31 Dec 11
From what I've seen, I actually think Huntsman could mop the floor with Obama if he had a chance in he1l of winning the nomination. He's a moderate with extensive foreign policy experience who has worked with both parties without ever having any issues. He also has a solid record as governor of Utah. For some reason though, he's never been able to get much of a following.
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
31 Dec 11
By the way, Santorum doesn't stand a chance of doing much of anything. I am still waiting for someone to ask him why it is that he said he had to leave Washington to "make some real money". The VAST majority of us could EASILY live off of a congressmen salary when you take all of their perks into account. I wonder why HE couldn't?
@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
3 Jan 12
Taskr, I hate to tell you this, but YOU might have a shot at the nomination. No one is out of this race, and no one is in the race. I have never seen anything like this. The only good thing for republicans is that no one seams to have great feelings for anyone guy so it will be easier to mend the fence to run against Obama. It would be interesting to see someone who was appointed by Obama run against him. That could make for a very interesting debate question.
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
29 Dec 11
It's amazing how we allow the media to control things, isn't it? I see all this shuffling as an effort to make sure the least viable candidate is nominated. With Cain I think the puppet masters saw someone who might bring real change to gov't and had to be eliminated at all costs. Now they are having the media manipulate the candidates and the coverage, trying to get a Santorum or Gingrich nominated. Santorum would not be elected because of his firm stands on some unpopular issues and Gingrich would probably fail because of his personal baggage, not to mention his aloofness and dealings with Fanny and Freddy. That would mean 4 more years of destruction and misery as the easily manipulated people re-elected our current prez.
I do hope common sense prevails and people see how they are being manipulated. Not likely, but I can still dream.








Ew.
I stopped taking the media seriously on presidential campaigns back in '08. They get higher viewership ratings from creating controversy where there is none rather than actually telling things like they are.
