Do you think its wasting a vote?

United States
September 13, 2008 6:32pm CST
Do you think people that will vote for Ron Paul or other small party leaders are wasting their vote? I think yes and no. They are voting for what they believe in but its a big election so why vote for someone you know wont win? If one of the small party leaders said to vote for McCain or Obama would you do it?
13 responses
• United States
14 Sep 08
In some states, a vote for a 3rd party candidate will make a difference in ballot access in the next (and other elections) - and in some states a vote for a 3rd party candidate won't hurt the party of your choice. My vote for Barack Obama in my state won't make much of a difference - my state is pretty solidly in the Obama camp. If I choose to vote for a 3rd party candidate, my vote WILL count toward the percentage of votes they need to garner in this election to be on the ballot in the next election.
• United States
14 Sep 08
me too Sarah! I'm in a swing state that usually goes red. I would sure like to see it blue this time.
• United States
14 Sep 08
You are very lucky to be living in a blue state. I am a very bright blue dot in a sea of red!
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
13 Sep 08
Because it's voting for people that you think will win, rather than the one's you think are best for the job that gets us into these political troubles in the first place. We're stuck in this Republican/Democrat mentality, and reality lies within the lines of those parties. Imagine all the change that could be done if the American populace grew a pair and actually voted for who they thought was right, rather than who they thought could win. We may actually have more than two parties passing legislation. We need to abolish this two party system - it's dragging our government and economy down. We need new ideas, and to do that, we need people from different parties. Or we could get rid of parties altogether. I wouldn't mind that either.
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
13 Sep 08
Forgot to add: McCain is no Ron Paul. Even if Ron Paul came to my front door and begged me on his knees to vote for McCain, I would still vote Ron Paul because it is Paul's views I agree with most, and it is Paul I want in the white house. I know he won't win, but that doesn't mean I'm going to follow the heard and vote for the most likely "winner", because that's far far worse than voting for the guy you know won't win.
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Sep 08
I think you make a very good point. I to think putting people into a party is a hard thing to do because i have views that are all over the board but i have to choose a party to be able to vote in our primarys. so its forced i guess you would say
@Sir_bobby88 (8231)
• Singapore
14 Sep 08
Well if you think that way then there is no point for a election yea .Every vote is really important to the contestant even if they lose yea.
• Ireland
14 Sep 08
Vote for what you believe in, Im Irish and if i was an American id vote Ron Paul along with alot of people where i live. We can see hes the only one that can speak the truth unfortunatly in US politics it doesnt work too good like that :(
@patms1 (521)
• United States
14 Sep 08
No I don't. If nothing else you are expressing your opinion and letting both parties know that you are not happy with either candidate. Some people will go into the voting booth close the curtain and just open the curtain and walk out. This is a way of voting with out voting. Voting is one of the most important privileges we have. Not to us it is wrong. I vote for who I think is the best one.
• United States
14 Sep 08
I agree with you! we are lucky to be able to vote and to walk out of the polling place without being shot or something else done to us. We should vote for who we want because they say the things we think are good for this country.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
14 Sep 08
I believe that voting is a responsibility and, as with any other responsibility, it must be done with care and consideration. Many years ago I supported a third party candidate who had no shot of winning...but I really liked what he stood for and hoped against hope that support for him would rally before election day so that I could vote for him. But, it didn't so on election day I voted for my second choice because I had a responsibility to those who fought for my right to cast my vote...as an American and as a woman...to make my vote count, one way or another.
• United States
14 Sep 08
Yeah, i have not always supported who the candidate was for my party like John Kerry he just didnt do it for me. I was more of a supporter of Wes Clark but he didnt make it that far so i had to vote with my party not write in Wes Clark as much as i would have liked too. I guess now 4 years later maybe i should have written him in :)
• United States
14 Sep 08
I think with so much at stake in this election we must do what is best for the country and if we know that a candidate is not going to win then we should vote to make thing better. If we vote for someone that dose not have a chance of winning it could keep the right person from becoming president. I would vote for the person that I thought could run the country, make real change and win the election.
@evanslf (484)
15 Sep 08
I don't think that anyone has the right to say that if an individual wishes to vote for a 3rd party candidate, that their vote is a waste. In the end, I think it all depends how strongly you feel about the two main parties and also whether you reluctantly prefer one of the main party candidates to the other. So if you really hate both main parties and if you really don't see any difference whatsoever between them, then you should vote for what you believe in, ie a 3rd party candidate if they happen to reflect your views. However, if you reluctantly prefer one of the main candidates compared to the other one, then it might be better for you to vote 'reluctantly', particularly if the election is close and if your vote could make a difference.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
14 Sep 08
Voting for what you believe in is never a waste of time. That's like saying your beliefs aren't worth risking not voting for whoever wins. Obviously most of us care who wins, but that doesn't make our beliefs any less important. Winning's not everything. It's like asking people throughout history, making a last stand for what they believe in knowing they'd lose (sometimes die) was a waste, I think. I'm an avid Ron Paul supporter, even though he's no longer in the race, I'm really hopin to hear something about all the write-ins that're gonna occur after election day. Even if it's only from the alternative media crowd, it'd mean something to me. See, the only way third parties won't ever get onto the big stage is because of the defeatist mentality. "Oh, they'll never win. It's a waste." it's what everyone's worked theselves into believing for so long, that they've made it true. People have the power to change it, if they want to. We just gotta get back to remembering what really matters...and I can tell you this: it ain't winning. I mean alot of people voted for Bush the first time thinking he'd change things -- and later have gone on to work against all the crap he's pulled. Your beliefs matters ALL the time, not just after the election's over.
@snowy22315 (170542)
• United States
14 Sep 08
I do if someone cant be elected what is the point of voting for them? I dont get the point, unless you are making a statement of some sort. I want to vote for a candidate is going to be elected.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
14 Sep 08
The individual voting probably doesn't think so but I believe it ends up being a wasted vote. There's how many this time around? Those votes are going to end up helping either the democratic or republican candidates more than the third party candidate. On the other hand it is good to shake up the system once in awhile.
@taface412 (3175)
• United States
28 Sep 08
Honestly I was on the fence about this topic myself. And yes this is a good point you make. I mean My voice of reason wants me to vote Paul, but then again I have always said if a candidate shows integrity and has served this fine country then they would get my vote. I see this in McCain. And I see that he is someone who, although many criticize for various reasons, does put his country first. This is not to put down Paul at all...it's just by majority one of the two party leaders will win. And from not only the political things I have seen of each candidate as well as personal characteristics...well I can honestly say I know who I am voting for. However, this needs to be said. If a person honestly thinks neither of the two party leaders are right for the position than do a write in vote.
• United States
13 Sep 08
i think that it is a total waste of vote because everyone knows that they won't win. If i liked a candidate, like ron paul, and i knew that he was not going to win, i would probably not vote for him. Instead i would vote for either the main republican or democrat candidate depending on who's ideas i liked better and who i thought could better run the country.
• United States
13 Sep 08
I feel that way too. i would say thats how 75% of me feels but the other 25% of me thinks that we have to be able to vote for anyone we want thats part of living in a free country.
• United States
14 Sep 08
i think that for some people they are wasting a vote. for instance every election there are about 1 million votes cast for mickey mouse. while i do agree that you shouldn't vote for who you think will win but who you agree with the most we all know that mickey mouse isn't and never will be the best for the job. he's a mouse. add the fact that he's not a real mouse and it's even more absurd. i think you should vote for who you think will be the best for the job but at the same time we all know that independents don't usually win.
@LUIS1334 (27)
• United States
14 Sep 08
no if they vote for what they believe in there pretty much not wasting anything its their chose to vote for who to win no matter if they dont think he/her will win its still great that you vote