No death squads  |
|
Florida is drawing up guidelines for the swine flu hospitalization. They are looking at baring any one with an incurable cancer, end-stage multiple sclerosis and other conditions from being admitted to hospitals if the state is overwhelmed by flu cases. It is also calls for doctors to remove patients with poor prognoses from ventilators to treat those who have better chances of surviving. This is for the worse case scenoreo.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message903669/pg1
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Barb42 (2708) | 3 months ago | I think it is terrible that a hospital can be given the permission to take a person off a respirator without the okay from a member of his/her family! It is morally wrong to decide who can live and who will die. To me, this is going to give them a reason to remove people from respirators that might would have lived and also give them a chance to not let dying cancer patients in the hospital= perhaps on a trumped up flu epidemic!
Life is getting bad for the sick and the elderly, believe me! We are expendable to them. And that angers me!! Every life is worth saving!
| |
| |
|
|
spalladino (9041) | 3 months ago | How can you trump up a pandemic? Every state and county is developing or has developed emergency procedures for this and, as unfair as it is, this is Florida's plan for how to respond to an overwhelming influx of patients during a pandemic. I do agree that every life is worth saving but sometimes you have to make a tough decisions. Should someone who can be saved be turned away so that someone else who is terminal can continue to be treated? This is the worst case scenario and I pray it never comes to this point.
| |
|
|
Barb42 (2708) | 3 months ago | When you give someone the leeway to do something like this, there is no way we would have of proving that there was an influx of flu cases to a particular hospital to warrant dismissing patients or removing others from life-saving devices. I think it's terrible to even have to think of such a thing! What I was saying is I don't think there will be enough cases going to a particular hospital to warrant doing any of these things. There was another scare just like this one back in the 70's, I think it was. There always seems to be a scare tactic connected with such things - GO OUT and get the flu shot. Heck, I've never had a flu shot and never had the flu. I think it pays to practice prevention and one of the easiest ways is to keep your hands clean - wash them every time you think about it. A Dr was talking about this yesterday on the TV and he said most people will cough IN their hands, and then handle a door knob, making it easy for others to get sick.
| |
|
|
spalladino (9041) | 3 months ago | It is terrible to have to think of such a thing but, as I said, states across this country are working on worse case scenario plans because of the uncertainty of what this flu will do and because of the problems that Canada and Mexico have already had with their hospitals being overwhelmed by H1N1 patients. I think it would be very easy for any state to prove that they were experiencing a pandemic by the number of people showing up needing care so no one hospital could just claim that that is the case. In some areas Florida has a lot of hospitals, other areas have less, and I would imagine that the final version of this will address the subject of transfers to other facilities...current it's only a draft. I've never had a flu shot either and don't plan to get this one unless there is a severe outbreak here...and after we see if this one is effective and safe.
| |
|
|
|
Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance ($90,000 Refinance under $489/mo) See Rates - No Credit Check Needed. www.LowerMyBills.com | add comment |
|
|
|
2. spalladino (9041) | 3 months ago | Here's a better link. They're talking about an overwhelming pandemic here, not under ordinary circumstances. I definitely wouldn't want to be in any of their shoes should the situation become that bad.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-swine-flu-crisis-propublica-sboct18,0,2336680.story
| |
| |
|
|
mommyboo (3376) | 3 months ago | I'd do what I could to get out of the state and somewhere else where I wasn't going to be treated like a leper because I wasn't sick with the 'pandemic'.... so they didn't consider me 'important'. LOL!
| |
|
|
|
Obama Backs Auto Insurance Regulation Drivers Pay $44/mo on Avg for Car Insurance. Are you paying too much? Auto-Insurance-Experts.com | add comment |
|
|
|
3. KatieDidit (887) | 3 months ago | While many just now are becoming aware of it because of this flu pandemic, this is really nothing new.
Triage is a very old medical practice. It happens every day in every hospital. Under ordinary circumstances triage means the worst most life threatening cases are treated first, then the ones that could degenerate into life or limb threatening - permanent damage etc and finally the mildly ill or slightly injured are the last to be treated and wait the longest.
But in mass casualty situations whether it's a hurricane Katrina, flu pandemic etc there is a tipping point where there are more, sometime far more people in need of help then there are resources (supplies, equipment and personal) to treat them. The triage pattern then changes. Those not likely to survive are treated last if they survive long enough to be treated at all. That's true no matter what they need to be treated for. It's sad that anyone has to die, but it's the only way to ensure that the fewest people die and the greatest number possible survive.
Believe me, no one wants to kill granny, they don't like having to make these choices. I think you'd be just as unhappy if it was your child or your spouse and 20 others that died because medicine was being practiced on a first come first serve basis instead.
| |
| |
|
|
spalladino (9041) | 3 months ago | You've provided some very good information, KatieDidit, but I'm afraid it's going to be lost in the fear factor. It looks like too many folks have no concept of what a crisis is and how plans need to be changed in order to save those who can be saved instead of letting them die needlessly.
| |
|
|
KatieDidit (887) | 3 months ago | Unfortunately I'm sure you're right.
| |
|
|
|
Online Degrees Get Your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. Education.Nextag.com/Online-Degrees | add comment |
|
|
|
4. mommyboo (3376) | 3 months ago | I don't think turning away people, especially people who have already needed treatment in the past - like people with cancer, ms, and other long term illnesses or diseases, and patients who already have a reason to be in the hospital on a ventilator - is a moral or decent 'plan' for any state to make. I'm sure you didn't mean this to be funny, but I read 'godlikeproductions' and just about threw up. Nobody gets the right to play God with a flu epidemic.
If they have a shortage, hello, open up clinics, turn other buildings into makeshift places to hospitalize those with swine flu. At least you'd be able to keep those people separate from other hospitalized people - I'm tired right now and I can't think of the word. Isolation?
Anyway, I completely disagree with this and I don't think other people - general public - would be pleased about it either, especially if they live in Florida and are living with a chronic terminal disease.
| |
| |
|
|
Barb42 (2708) | 3 months ago | You are so right, Mommyboo. I think they are trying to play God, too!
Even my doctor isolates those with symptoms of the flu. They do not sit in the same waiting room with the others. I was there getting a test one day downstairs and they had a guy sitting upstairs in another area,wearing a face mask, away from the outside waiting room. I liked that idea!
| |
|
|
thea09 (4657) | 3 months ago | I'm with mommyboo on this one, if there's a pandemic of flu expected prepare in advance with makeshift centres to quarantine them in (the isolation word you were searching for). They've done that kind of thing of using other buildings instead of hospitals in the past, look how they manage in war situations.
| |
|
|
spalladino (9041) | 3 months ago | I believe this plan focuses on the most seriously ill patients...the ones who need ventilators for life support since those who have died have had serious respiratory problems. Opening up clinics or other makeshift facilities does no good if they don't have the equipment available to support life. Meanwhile, terminally ill patients with DNRs should remain on life support while 6 year olds die because none are available? I live in Florida. It's a very large state with many hospitals that could share the burden of a large number of patients needing critical care. If it got bad enough for this plan to go into effect here, Florida is not going to be the only state with a serious problem.
| |
|
|
|
Online College Degrees Get your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. CollegeDegreeNetwork.com/Degrees | add comment |
|
|
|
5. tatazbrush (139) | 3 months ago | wow in florida many people got cancer, what the first aid and movement of the state hospital? they must manage and care every patient as fast as possible=)
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6. artibhardwaj (2) | 3 months ago | I want to suggest that precaution is better than cure, so protect yourself to get infected from swine flu. Always wear the mask when you go out. Ans there is one homeopathic medicine called 'influnzium' you can take this medicine, this is one of the best medicines which you can take precautionary, ofcourse you hav to take advice of your docter.
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
7. anniepa (9271) | 3 months ago | I certainly hope and pray it never reaches this obviously worse case scenario. I'm telling myself it probably wont and that they just need to be prepared for the worst while hoping for the best. Unfortunately, as horrifying as this seems, there are tines in the health profession when very tough decisions must be made. From what 've heard about the H1N1 flu it's something that particularly hits children and pregnant women as well as the elderly and those with conditions that affect their immune systems. Hopefully everyone, especially those in the risk groups, will do their own part to prevent themselves from being one of those emergency flu patients making it so there's no room for the ones with the "poor prognoses" They should be getting the vaccine as soon as it becomes available if their own doctor who they trust advises it and they should avoid being in crowded situations especially in places where there are other sick people. They should fanatical about washing their hands VERY frequently and coughing or sneezing into their sleeves and no on their hands or on someone else.
I say nobody should panic just yet and we should realize that these hospitals are no doubt working on finding the best way to deal with a pandemic without disrupting the care of others in need of treatment.
Annie
| |
| |
|
|
pergammano (2014) | 3 months ago | We have a situation here, in the province of B.C., to date, past month, 8 young ladies between the ages of 20 to 30, have passed with H1N1, and these dear souls have/had NO underlying medical conditions, as they all have been autopsied! Our province has had to re-think the guidelines...re; pregnant women, children, and the elderly, as it seems to have modified, and attacking very healthy, young women!
| |
|
|
anniepa (9271) | 3 months ago | That is so horrible! I know I've heard it said that this is a young person's disease and for some reason it's very bad for pregnant women. I've been telling everyone I know to make sure they tell everyone THEY know that pregnant women have to be very, VERY cautious.
Annie
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8. sharone74 (2227) | 3 months ago | Doctors have always felt that they are akin to God and they like these new powers they are being given I am sure. Has no one woken up to the fact that once they get these guidlines in place that it will pertain to everyone and every illness? People with poor prognosis' have come back strong and lived long healthy lives following illness while people who appear to be getting better drop dead with neither rhyme nor reason to it. And as for the swine flu, don't they feel this whole thing is a little premature? Less people have died of this stupid swine flu than die in the course of the year from the regular flu. Why are they all blowing this so out of proportion. They want to get these mandates in place before socialized medicine takes hold. Florida has such a poor population of retirees and just dirt poor folks. What these laws are aiming at I think is saying let the poor or undeinsured drop dead so they don't cost us more money. I don't think that is fair. I think everyone is entitled to healthcare and a hospital bed when they are fighting for their lives regardless of how much money they may or may not have. Doesn't this whole thing fly in the face of the Hippocratic oats mandate? First do no harm?
| |
| |
|
|
spalladino (9041) | 3 months ago | Did you read the article that I provided in my response above? These guidelines pertain to the H1N1 only, it's not for general practice. I live in Florida and I have to disagree with your assumption that the majority of our residents are dirt poor. You've obviously never been here. You talk about the Hippocratic oath so, tell me, what should a hospital do in the face of a true pandemic where the hospitals are overrun with seriously ill people? Not mildly ill...children and young adults in respiratory distress, who need a ventilator in order to live and none are available? Should the terminally ill patients in the end stages of their lives, many with DNR orders, take priority to those who could recover from this flu with medical support?
| |
|
|
KatieDidit (887) | 3 months ago | My grandmother was an Army Nurse during WWI who treated solders at Fort Devons during the 1918 flu pandemic.
The 1918 flu was an H1N1 flu The flu we're talking about here is an H1N1 flu
The 1918 flu started out as mild, most people survived. The flu we have now is mild, most are surviving.
The 1918 flu didn't disappear during the summer months as most flu's do but kept on infecting new patients. The flu we have now didn't disappear during the summer months. It has kept on infecting new patients.
The 1918 flu was a pandemic flu - world wide The flu we have now is a pandemic flu
The normal flu kills the weak. The old, the very young (usually under 2) and those with compromised immune systems.
The 1918 flu killed the strong, the young healthy kids and adults. The flu we have now is killing the strong, young healthy kids and adults.
When the 1918 flu mutated it's estimated that it infected 1/3 of the worlds population and killed between 20 and 50 million people. People would become sick one day and would be dead the next. They couldn't bury the bodies fast enough. They were collected and laid out in whatever town buildings were designated as makeshift morgues while they hammered simple coffins as fast as they could. Then they were stacked in the coffins and had to wait until they could be buried. Mass burials were common.
That is the concern now. This flu mirrors the 1918 flu except that it hasn't mutated...yet. If it mutates, and there is NO way to stop it from mutating, then we are looking at the possibility of 10's of millions of young healthy kids and adults dying. They'll be laughing, loving, working, playing one day, sick the next and dead the day after.
This flu is no joke. The talk, the plans aren't premature or blowing anything out of proportion. It's preparing for the worst with the hope that it won't happen yet being ready to hopefully save the most lives possible if it does.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
9. pergammano (2014) | 3 months ago | Oh my goodness .... deebomb, this sorta reminds me of the old adage; "What's the difference between God and a Doctor...GOD doesn't think he's a DOCTOR! Boy, is this hallowed ground that I am afraid to walk on! This is sooooo controversial, I cannot even wrap my thoughts around it....and so many, many "what if's" keep creeping in the back door of my mind! Like WHOM is charged with the decision? WOW..you have me just reeling....IT IS SUCH A TRIAGE decision! I will have to go away and ponder this for even longer./cheers!
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
10. lilwonders456 (1930) | 3 months ago | Well we all may not like it....but they are looking at a worse case scarino. What happens if more people need ventilators than the hospital acutally has. Say you have 100 people that need ventilators due to different illnesses. But you only have 80. Well 80 patients that have the best chance at suviving their illness gets them....while the others do without and die. If they gave the ventilator to a person THEY knew was going to die no matter what and did not give it to someone who it could have saved...well then you have two dead people instead of just one. I know that is a cold and calulated way of looking at it....but when things are in short supply hard decisions need to be made. Lets just hope that the swine flu does not get to the "worse case" scarino. Hospitals do have budgets. THey don't have endless amounts of money. They can only afford to buy so much equiptment and medicines. So they do they best they can with what they have.
Want my advice...try like heck to NOT get sick this winter. My dad and sister work in the medical field and they said they are both seeing a ton flu cases really early this year. They are already seeing what would be normal when the flu season is in full swing...and we are just at the beginning of it now. It is going to be a BAD regular flu season. Then add swine flu on top of it. This could turn into a "worse case" scarino. Can can hope it doesn't. But it very easily could.
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Online College Degrees Get your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. CollegeDegreeNetwork.com/Degrees
| | |
|
|
|
|