In North Carolina Atheist Are Not Allowed To Be Elected

@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
February 27, 2010 9:44pm CST
Cecil Bothwell was recently elected as a member of the Asheville, North Carolina city council, but some are calling for his removal. Is Cecil some murder, no he is an atheist. Apperently in North Carilona state Constitution bars anyone from holding an elected office who denies the existence of Almighty God. http://www.citizen-times.com/article/20091208/NEWS01/912080327
4 people like this
8 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
28 Feb 10
Well you know these are ancient laws that came from old English common-law. Most states just see them as archaic and void and don't bother wasting the taxpayer money necessary to remove them from the books. Then we get some idiots that try to use them to push a political agenda and suddenly we have a pointless supreme court case to formally declare something that anyone with half a brain already knows. I'll bet if you look at the state constitutions throughout the country you'll find a good number still have such laws on the books.
2 people like this
• United States
28 Feb 10
There are A LOT of these stupid laws out there, and every so often you find someone that wants to enforce them. I saw one city had a law that you couldn't chew gum while walking on a city street on a Tuesday. This law was written in the late 1800's and never enforced. Like you said, I am surprised that someone would be dumb enough to make a fool of themselves by trying to enforce an ancient law that serves no purpose at all.
1 person likes this
@LaurenInLA (2270)
• United States
28 Feb 10
That has got to be one old law. I'm surprised that it hasn't been challenged yet. I do believe in God but do not believe that a person's religion or lack of religion has anything to do with their qualification for any political office.
2 people like this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
28 Feb 10
Yes it is an old law, as old as the state of North Carolina. I am sure that there were Christians that voted for Mr. Bothwell, it would be hard to imagine a city in the south that would have enough Atheist alone to win.
1 person likes this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
28 Feb 10
I'm not sure what you are proposing as a debating point here. North Carlina has an archaic law. okay. The populace voted for someone who doesn't fit the parameters of that law. okay. Are you asking if we feel he should be in office or are you asking who voted him in or are you asking if this law should even exist?
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
28 Feb 10
Really I have to explain my motives when I write a discussion? Come on now there is such as just writing about a news story and having people comment on it. Not everything has to be a debate.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
1 Mar 10
I certainly wasn't demanding an explanation. I just never noticed anything here before where someone reported news and didn't offer any opinion or ask for one.
• United States
28 Feb 10
Irish, are you a lawyer?
1 person likes this
28 Feb 10
I don't think Councilor Bothwell's going to have very much trouble with this. It's pretty clear-cut that this law is unconstitutional, and the main opposition seems to be some nutcase who likes to dress in Confederate uniform in public! This antiquated, anti-freedom law does need to be repealed though. If I was the head of a government (at any level, national state or whatever) I think I would set up a committee to go through all the old laws and recommend ones for repeal that obviously don't have a useful purpose anymore - sort of a housecleaning exercise.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
28 Feb 10
I do not know if government people know how to perform housecleaning when it comes to their antiquated laws. Heck they seem to love those anti-freedom laws because every time one comes up for vote they approve it.
• United States
28 Feb 10
Well that is stupid. Does the state constitution say WHICH almighty they have to acknowledge or will any do? What ever happened to separation of church and state. I bet this one could be fought and won in court.
2 people like this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
28 Feb 10
What if Cecil Bothwell said he believed in the flying spaghetti monster as his lord and savior? I am sure that he will win a court battle, but the problem is that he even has to fight this issue. The voters of Asheville elected him, for the reasons that are up to them, and that should be the end of that.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Feb 10
That clause of the North Carolina State Constitution violates the United States Constitution, and as such is null and void. Mr. Bothwell is currently serving in the office to which he was lawfully elected, and if someone sues Ashville over it they're likely to get fined for filing a frivilous brief.
1 person likes this
• United States
4 Mar 10
OMG that was my answer too, lol. (fyi yes I do feel like a valley girl with the omgs and lols)
@laglen (19759)
• United States
1 Mar 10
If it is a law, it is a law. They need to petition to remove it then all will be well. A lot of States have crazy out dated laws. That is why it is so important to clean these up every few years or so. I am not saying it is right, but there is an easy way to fix it.
• United States
28 Feb 10
Apparently the representatives in North Carolina forgot the reason why the pilgrims came to this country. I hope that the representatives of North Carolina are smart enough to understand that the voice of the people is more important than the ideology of a few, and change the law. But, it will be interesting to see what happens.
1 person likes this