Anyone else confused about what is going on in Wisconsin?

United States
February 18, 2011 10:32am CST
The democrats in the house have fled the state and there are massive demostrations going on. Why? Because the government wants to sign a bill that would make teachers pay a bigger share of their healthcare premiums and the state would not contribute as largely into their retirement accounts. It would also make the teachers vote each year to decide if they want to stay unionized. It would also limit the power of the union to negociate their pay. Well lets see what are other states doing? New York is going to lay off 60,000 teachers Illinois is just borrowing more money instead of balancing their budgets California is doing a hiring freeze Camden NY layed off 1/2 their police force and closed 1/3 of the fire departments So WI is not looking too bad now is it? No one is getting laid off. There is not a hiring freeze. The state is not just borrowing more money and ignoring its fincial problems. No one taking money from the kids education. Just some of the benefits from the teachers. I don't see that what the governor of WI is asking is such a big deal. Everyone is going to have to make sacrifices in these hard economic times. That being said I do think teachers are under appricated and under paid. But in these hard economic times there is not a lot we can do about it. Maybe before you send your kids off to school tomorrow you could sent a note with him or her thanking the teacher for all their hard work and dedication. It is the best we can do right now. But at least it is something. I saw on CNN teachers being interviews that were saying "we are out here for the kids". BS. You are out there protesting for yourself. No one is taking money from the kids. They are taking money from the teachers. Not from the kids. SO stop playing the kid card. So anyone else wonder why this has turned into a three ring circus? Teachers...do what the rest of the country is doing and deal with it. When economic times are better THEN you can ask for more money and benefits. Right now we can't afford it. it is not that people don't love you or appricate you....we just can't afford it. Just be glad you have a job. That is what the rest of the employed country is doing. And I am sure there are a ton of unemployed people that would LOVE your job even with fewer benefits. What is your take on what is happening?
7 people like this
17 responses
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
18 Feb 11
As a Wisconsinite I chalk it up to people being spoiled and whining, not wanting to pay their fair share as others do.
• United States
18 Feb 11
I am watching this and just floored by this. I mean come on. All he asking is for them to give some. He is not doing massive layoffs. I honestly think he is trying to fix things but make poeple sacrifice as little as possible. But you don't see these poeple being appricative about it. I mean he could have just done mass lay offs you know. Brats. that is what I see massing on the state house. A bunch of brats. I wonder what htey will think if they get fired for missing so much work.
1 person likes this
@gladys46 (1205)
• United States
18 Feb 11
I understand the issue as the workers have already given up salary increases ... that they are willing to pay more towards their pensions ... what they will not give up is their right to collectively bargain in the future. They are NOT BRATS .. they are hardworking American citizens who have earned what they take home from years of tenure!! This protest has nothing to do with balancing WI's budget, it has all to do with union busting just as Karl Rove stated. If there is a budget to balance, why not retrieve it from the riches in this nation and in WI by ending the ridiculous, unwarranted tax cut gifts??? If anybody thinks they'll be "informed" by FOX noise, please know that you'll always be mis/disinformed ... the so-called "news" is not balanced and has never been fair! I'd like to know just how many ways do tea partiers want to have it ... more of their earned wages or more to corporate america???
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Feb 11
I don't think teachers are appricated enough or paid enough. But honestly I don't think they should have collective bargaining rights. When sign up to be a teacher you know you are a state employee. The only way states get money is through taxes. They only get so much money. So therefore the state only has so many resources to go around. The unions don't care about that. They don't care about the states have to stay in a budget or have to fund more than just education. Also they use bully tatics to get their way. Don't give them what they want? They stage walk outs and protests (real great for the kids huh). Try that in the corporate world. YOu would find yourself out of a job real fast. I mean who is the boss here? The state (their employer) or the union? I do think teachers deserve fair pay. But when state budgets not being fixed (they change year to year depending on how much they get in taxes) therefore what they can afford to pay changes. Unions are not flexible enough. And we are not talking about a private company here and their board of directors and profit margins. We are talking about tax payer dollars. Also....everyone is complaining about (as you put it) tax cut gifts....that is federal...not state...so even IF they got taken away it still would not help the states because it would end up with the federal government and not the state. So ending them won't help states get out of debt or balance their budgets. You would still have this happening.
2 people like this
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
18 Feb 11
The politicians are acting like spoiled little brats. That pretty much sums it up.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Feb 11
No, the teachers aren't. While, I support their right to assembly, calling in sick to protest and shutting down schools is not responsible behavior.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Feb 11
I support their right to protest. I just don't agree with why they are protesting. I mean come on. They are acting like brats. Eveyone in the country is taking a hit and making sacrifices...they need to do it too.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Feb 11
I don't see the teachers protesting as acting any better. Walker is not asking too much. He is not laying anyone off. He just wants them to pay more into their benefits program. The teachers need to be apart of solution...right now they are part of the problem.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
18 Feb 11
something to bear in mind, if they cant get a hold of the union issue, then they will be laying off teachers. They should take their lumps and be grateful they still have a job.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
18 Feb 11
exactly. But then the union guys will have done their job, the people that will get to keep their job will be happy and I am sure the ones that get laid off can live off of their unemployment!
• United States
19 Feb 11
Your kidding me right? The unions would rather stay in power and let thousands loose their jobs, in this horrible economy...than to get out of our government business. Wow...and how to people think unions are good again? How is that "protecting" the workers? that is protecting the union..not the worker.
1 person likes this
• United States
18 Feb 11
Yep that is my whole point. They should be glad they have jobs. A lot states are laying off tons of teachers. These guys are getting to keep their jobs. They should be grateful if they can't be happy. If they do get this stopped...then the government will have no choice but to look at mass lay offs. So do you want collective bargaining...or do you want a job?
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
18 Feb 11
The only thing I'm actually confused about is whether Wisconsin really has a budget deficit and whether or not it's true it only went into deficit when the new governor gave out tax cuts to the rich. I've been hearing they'd been "sitting on a huge surplus". This is not only about teachers, far from it and it really has nothing to do with saving money. It's pure, unadulterated POLITICS from the word go. The new GOP Governor and majority in the Wisconsin legislature want to protect themselves politically. The best way for them to do that is to bust the unions. Since the ridiculous Citizens Unite4d Supreme Court decision the GOP has a decided advantage in fundraising with virtually all of the largest corporations, not to mention groups such as Karl Rove's, giving to them. If all or most of the major unions are busted the Democrats will have nobody on their side. It's especially interesting to note that while police and firefighters are exempt from the bill taking away the right to collective bargaining for anything other than pay, other public safety workers such as Corrections officers, Conservation Wardens, Capitol Police, Forest Rangers, Department of Justice Agents, and others are not. What is the difference? The former donated mostly to Republicans while the latter gave primarily to Democrats. What this bill would do is take away the right of collective bargaining for everything except pay from most state and municipal employees. Nobody has said the workers, including teachers, aren't willing to make sacrifices like everyone else has had to. They've said they're willing to give on health care benefits and pensions. They don't want to lost the right to negotiate. These workers earn an average of slightly over $50,000 per year which is lower than the average private sector worker in Wisconsin. The majority of these state employees have four year college degrees. The average worker would lose between $10,000 and $12,000 per year under the governor's proposal. How many people would take that sitting down? As for taking away from the kids, I don't know the specifics in Wisconsin but I know in most places they've already taken a lot away from the kids. Annie
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
20 Feb 11
The falsehood that Wisconsin had a huge surplus which the governor gave away in tax cuts to the rich comes from statements made by Rachel Maddow on her MSNBC program. There is no substance to this accusation and Politifact has pronounced it untrue and baseless. I doubt that will matter to Maddow but since her new bosses seem to be cutting down on the number of employees who make things up out of whole cloth, she ought to try to source her claims before she puts them out there on the air. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2011/feb/18/rachel-maddow/rachel-maddow-says-wisconsin-track-have-budget-sur/
• United States
18 Feb 11
From what I have found they are going to have a mulit million dollar short fall for the next fiscal year starting this july so they are trying to get in front of it. Unemployement, under employement, dropping property values...it all leads to less money. From what I am hearing the teachers have now come out and said that they are willing to give up some of the benefits but not the collective bargaining. I have mixed feelings about that. I really don't think unions and government employees should not mix. They are not a corporation with profits and a "product" to sell. The state relies on taxes only. Which means their income and budgets are pretty fluid. Which means state employess have to be pretty fluid in what they can exspect. there are tons of people loosing all kinds of benefits at their jobs. There are people taking pay cuts. They are not happy about...but they are thankful to still have a job.
• United States
19 Feb 11
anniepa, you are wrong about the policeman, firemen, etc. giving to the governor. By about a 94% majority, they gave to the Democratic party, because the union members do not make the decision; the union bosses do. Wisconsin is indeed facing a multi-million dollar shortfall for June and a multi-BILLION dollar shortfall for the next budget. If you look closely, you will see that all but about four states face the same challenge. Even Democratic governors, like New York's, are having a huge dose of reality when they find that if they keep raising taxes, without cutting seriously, there will soon be no middle class. The massive loss of jobs hasn't helped since the people who once paid taxes are now receiving refund checks on their taxes, instead of perhaps finding they owe. By the way, the nice rich folks like Bill Gates, give to BOTH parties, and most of them give more to the Democratic party, hoping they will stop raising taxes on businesses and running them out of the country. They get sweet-talked when an election looms(such as the Presidential one in 2012) and lamblasted when it's over. Remember the 'business' summit they just had at the White House? It's time to give the business owners honey. If Obama wins in 2012, the big business will get the vinegar instead.
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
18 Feb 11
I haven't watched a lot of the demonstrations, but what little I've seen/heard, I'm losing empathy for the teachers. I agree, these teachers aren't out there for the kids and the kids demonstrating really upset me... They didn't even know why they were out there carrying signs. Man, I "hate" unions... I'd also hope the Governor/Legislature is taking a hard look at administrative costs. That's what our Governor is doing. We'll be consolidating districts...schools may not be closing, but administrations will be consolidated. I'm working on the second year of frozen annuity. And I'm working on the second year of increased health care premiums (plus a lot of other increases). I'm not happy about it, but I don't intend to drive to Santa Fe and bi*ch.
• United States
18 Feb 11
People all over this country are having their benefits cut, taking pay cuts, getting layed off, having to work more and get less. Teachers are not different. The more I watch the protests the more I am getting mad at the teachers.
• United States
18 Feb 11
Fired them. I am sure there are tons of unemployed people out there that would LOVE to have the job...even with fewer benefits and less collective bargaining.
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
18 Feb 11
Same here. And the ones calling in sick...I'd dock their pay unless they bring me a doctor's slip.
• United States
18 Feb 11
Two things not mentioned: 1) the bill would strip them of their collective bargaining rights. 2) already negotiated items would be undone and teachers would lose things like overtime pay. Most people who work for private employers would not stand for working 50-hour weeks and being paid for 40 hours; why should teachers?
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
18 Feb 11
1) the bill would strip them of their collective bargaining rights. ONLY on benefits, it does not effect collective bargaining on pay. "2) already negotiated items would be undone and teachers would lose things like overtime pay." See my response to number 1.
• United States
18 Feb 11
I know plenty of poeple working overtime and not getting paid for it. They are paid a salary and as the economy has gotten worse they are being forced to work more hours without any additional pay. Companies are laying poeple off and then requiring the remaining staff to do all the work. I know people who have had their companies get rid of all kinds of benefit programs. Why shouldn't the teachers be any different. ALL OF US ARE MAKING SACRIFICES and making to make due with less. At this point in the economy people are just thankful to have a job. As for collective bargaining....they are state employees paid with tax dollars. I don't think they should have collective bargaining rights.
• United States
18 Feb 11
thanks X...so ok...they still get paid for overtime. These teachers are whiners. they need to get over it and be glad they HAVE a job.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Feb 11
A few corrections from a Wisconsinite... ~It's not just the teachers, it's all state employees, and many local employees (except fire and police). ~The workers would lose most of their collective bargaining.. The reason for this is, it would be impossible to reduce the cost of government if all the unions have to do is put the expenses back in the next contract cycle. The part that has the union thugs pissing in their pizza... it would remove the requirement to join the unions. It would also remove the requirement of non union members to pay the equivalent of union dues. Workers would also get the opportunity to choose whether to be a union or non union shop every year. In fairness, once Walker was elected, the union thugs saw the writing on the wall. All of the sudden they were all for making union members pay into their own pensions and medical benefits.
• United States
18 Feb 11
What is so bad about the workers getting to vote every year if they want to stay unionized? I think that is fair. I don't like unions but I still think that is fair. Everyone in this country is having to take pay benefits and pay cuts...they need to suck it up and go on. What makes any of the state employees anymore special than the rest of us. I don't think ANY state employee should be able to be in a union. Those are tax dollars they are being paid with. Unions do make it hard to stick to a budget and we HAVE GOT to start being more responsible with money.
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
18 Feb 11
They are all acting like a bunch of sniveling, whiny little brats, politicians and teachers alike. With the economy as it is there are many people who haven't gotten raises in a very long time and many who don't have any kinds of benefits. Like you, I agree that the teachers deserve more but now isn't the time for the extras. Over here last year a whole group of them in an elementary school did not get the raises that they were hoping for. They reacted by refusing to stay after school or participate in any of the extra-curricular activities. Well, their pouting didn't get them what they wanted. The parents all jumped in and took over all these extras. I get that they are disappointed but suck it up. They are very lucky to be drawing a paycheck every week. They are setting very poor examples for the kids they claim to care so much about.
• United States
18 Feb 11
Yep you are right. The need to do like the rest of us and suck it up and keep working.
• Finland
18 Feb 11
yes..you are right,,
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
18 Feb 11
For the amount of education they need to become teachers, you could say they are not paid very well. On the other hand, teachers have other benefits not available in some other professions. Many teachers enjoy the benefit of having summers off and the same vacations as their kids. It's not the way to amass a fortune, but it's not starvation pay, either. I had to support two kids on a salary that was less than the average teacher's salaries in most states. I paid my share of my health insurance premiums out of that pay and I had to buy vacation days to cover all the kids' sick days as well as pay for after school care and summer programs. This is the way it is for a lot of people. So I don't think the school day hours and yearly calendar is a benefit that we can completely overlook. I appreciate that teachers need adequate compensation if we hope to attract qualified people to the field. But I don't think they are paid so poorly that it is unthinkable to require them to contribute to their own health insurance premiums or their own pensions.
• United States
18 Feb 11
Personally in a perfect world teachers would be paid better than doctors or politicans in my opinion. But we don't have the money. I hate to see this happen to them. But it is happening to everyone. It is the economic times we are in. So instead of whining about it...I think they need to suck it up and keep going. Just like the rest of us.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
18 Feb 11
I am not a State Union Member (Not sure if this is SEIU or not haven't read much news on this issue just whats been posted up here.) I am a member of the Teamsters which deals in a multiple areas but our current contract our Union made concessions to the company. That weren't to our Benefits but to our pay and how our pay increases work. I think it all depends on which Union and what company you are a part of. SEIU for example is a Giant Union which means they have a ton of power. Also they are stating that this is about their right to a Collective Bargaining agreement. Which is a right of Unionized workers is to have a Contract with their Employer stating what is to be expected of both parties. The one I am under is that Management will not do a Union Job unless an "act of God" happens. Or that I am to work safely and follow OSHA Regulations.
@dark_joev (3034)
• United States
18 Feb 11
Well as a Union they do need Collective Bargaining that is how Unions work they get the Employer to sign an Collective Bargaining Agreement that has the things that the Employer will do and things the Employee must do so that way everyone gets what they want the Workers get a safe environment and the pay they earn. With out the Collective Bargaining Agreement you don't have the ability for workers to Unionize which if this fight is about the Rights for workers to unionize and have a Collective Bargaining Agreement things are going to get ugly because multiple unions could job down on this. If SEIU is in this state they will most diffidently use their massive amount of power to push this back. State Employees do need collective Bargaining if they feel that Unionizing is needed that is their choice not the Employers choice. Like Police and Fire Fighters need it to make sure they are supplied with the right training and equipment to do their jobs. Department of Correction workers need to also have this same thing also they need to have benefits as they are in a highly risky environment where they could get nasty infections and other things. Teachers also may need protection as they feel is needed. The state signed the agreement and well if they are trying to back out of a contract than I am with the Union in saying no you signed it and we have a right to the Collective Bargaining Agreement. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_labor_law#Regulation_of_unions_and_organizing http://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/employerunion-rights-obligations The Federal Government and Acts passed support the Unionization of workers and the right of a collective Bargaining agreement. So I have to support the Unions if this is the issue they are fighting over. If the State isn't trying to skip out of an agreement they made with the Union then they should wait until they get to the table before having this huge fight.
• United States
18 Feb 11
They are teachers. State employees.They don't need "collective bargaining". I can understand that some jobs DO need them to make sure they workers are kept safe and properly paid....but not these guys.
@yoyo1198 (3641)
• United States
18 Feb 11
Well I'd like to see a Wisconsin teacher come in here and give us their two cents' worth. We were warned a couple of months ago by the New Jersey governor that the states were ALL going to going into financial crises. I see that the circus is now beginning. What do the citizens do when their state can't pay its bills anymore? Go to the statehouse and demonstrate? Wonder what good they think that's going to do? Ole' weepy Boehner says the U.S. is broke. So the federal government is probably going to see some protesters on the Capitol steps too before long. The whole world is broke as far as I see it. And prices are going up on everything from gasoline to oranges. Instead of demonstrating, protesting and getting all in a panic, it's time to suck it up and make do. Those of us without jobs have been doing that for years now. We can start our own gardens, barter for goods, ride bikes, cut down on the delivery pizza and make our own meals, and start living within our means.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Feb 11
Why are only the teachers being singled out here? It's almost all of the state and municipal workers who are being cut and who are protesting. Even many from the unions that are exempt because they donated to Walker's campaign are there in solidarity with their union brothers and sisters. Annie
@yoyo1198 (3641)
• United States
19 Feb 11
After reading the news and seeing some of the reports on tv, I see that it is several professions that are protesting. They are afraid their collective bargaining rights are going to be taken away. Seems like they've been in the unions since the 50's or 60's if I am reading correctly.
• United States
18 Feb 11
The longer this goes on...the worse the teachers look.
@matersfish (6306)
• United States
18 Feb 11
"the kid card" Just because I'm a curious kinda guy, I wonder how many of these people picketing also wanted tax increases on people making X dollars a year? I'd really be interested to know. Nobody wants to pay extra for something. So that I can understand. But when you look at the benefits of public vs. private, it's really, really shocking. All the nonsense aside, a system like that CANNOT PROPERLY FUNCTION, because it costs too much taxpayer money to keep giving public employees more money. Having public employees "pay into" something is misleading. They'll effectively just be taking home fewer private employees' dollars at the end of the day. So I can see being a little peeved with it, but aren't they smart enough to realize that there are limited options out there?
• United States
18 Feb 11
No one is happy about making these cuts. But htey have to be done. Protesting won't solve this problem.
• United States
19 Feb 11
These are the average teachers salaries in Wisconsin as per http://www.teacher-world.com/teacher-salary/wisconsin.html: •Green Bay: $55,110 •Kenosha: $68,400 •Madison: $50,770 •Milwaukee: $54,620 •Racine: $49,710 Add in free insurance, free pensions, they make quite a tidy sum over their lifetimes. Yes, they are important, but they are not the best by any stretch of the imagination, as each year, the United States sinks lower and lower on the learning scale for our students. Far too many complete high school unable to spell or do simply math without the use of a calculator. Even more cannot write a simple sentence. Teachers who themselves, often have atrocious spelling, cannot be fired because they unions interfere. This is what is going on in Wisconsin. Those who know if they have to get raises through merit increases, know they won't make it and will be fired. The union bosses have brought in busload after busload of union members to fill in the gaps that would be left if only those Wisconsin teachers were out in the streets. Many of the teachers actually would be thrilled to get around $500 back in their pockets from not having to pay union dues. Many of them are smart enough to realize that Wisconsin's governor is trying to keep the whole state from going bankrupt - which it legally cannot do without the blessings of the Feds. Our president is once again sticking his nose in State business, while ignoring the bonfire in his own backyard that is growing out of control. Since the unions gave over a billion dollars to the Democratic party, he feels compelled to accuse Wisconsin's Republican governor of Union Busting. That is another thing going on in Wisconsin. The union bosses don't want to lose their sweet lives either. They make a bundle off the union dues and decide where to spend it without taking into consideration that not all forced union members are Democrats. That is also what is going on in Wisconsin. As for the Democratic Senators who took themselves out of state and into a bar, that should be enough to get rid of them in the next election. They were voted in to work, not run at the first sign of something they didn't like. Here's hoping most voters remember their actions at the voting booth. By the way, in comparison: The average Policeman's salary is $47,000, with a high of $64,000 in the Virgin Islands. They put their lives on the line every day and yet, make less than the teachers who have declared an unscheduled holiday for the children they are supposed to be teaching. So far, they are teaching them that the children's education doesn't matter half as much as the union bosses' commands. But then, the top union boss once said (paraphrased) "I'll worry about the children's needs when they can pay union dues." Evidently, they aren't paying dues yet. P.S. Are you aware that when a teacher is accused of things that would get the normal person fired, if they are taken out of service, they are still paid full salary, even if another person has to be hired in their place?
@andy77e (5156)
• United States
21 Feb 11
It was never about students, or even teachers really. It's about Unions and control. If the Unions allow these cuts, it will be admission of a loss of control over the system. They can't allow that. They would rather cut hundreds of teacher jobs, than allow that loss of control, and weakening of the unions.
• United States
19 Feb 11
they do that here too.every year they strike for more and more,right before the school year,and these are people making 60-90K per year with big fat retirement plans. they should pay more of their healthcare-they can afford it a lot more ably than someone making minimum wage. our teachers have some of the worst test scores,and that's not exactly a bargaining chip in my view.
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
19 Feb 11
It's really sad to think that these are the types of people who are teaching our children. It's almost as if they have been looking and waiting for a fight. Maybe the protests in Egypt and all over the world, by Moslems got them fired up. There are real threats to be protesting for Heavens sake, they just change history books in Texas. Islam is about to take over the world and their all worried about having to pay like the rest of us... Unions and the liberal media are destroying this country...
@murtaza45 (173)
• India
18 Feb 11
your sometime for in your house why something else for share me friends i am solve the problem there hard recrading for life not a confused so handle for tips for easily confused to no next time change for life for no confusion no life me.