The Food Police are coming after your kids' lunchboxes!

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
February 14, 2012 2:23pm CST
The Food Police are after your kid's lunch! Apparently pre-schools and day care centers are being required to check the kids lunches. If the lunch doesn't have all the required components, the child is not allowed to eat it. Instead, the facility is required to provide the "right" food choices, at the parents expense... even if the kid refuses to eat it. "The Division of Child Development and Early Education at the Department of Health and Human Services requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs — including in-home day care centers — to meet USDA guidelines. That means lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from home." Mandates and waste from yet another government bureaucracy that is out of control!! http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=8762&__utma=1.331703988.1329250575.1329250575.1329250575.1&__utmb=1.1.10.1329250575&__utmc=1&__utmx=-&__utmz=1.1329250575.1.1.utmcsr%3Dyahoo|utmccn=(organic)|utmcmd=organic|utmctr=food%20police%20in%20elementary%20schools&__utmv=-&__utmk=133772814
6 people like this
12 responses
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
15 Feb 12
This is a difficult subject for me but I'm adamant that I don't want government dictating how we raise our children, no matter what the subject! I have a great-nephew who is being raised by a mother whose father let her be raised by her grandparents who needed someone to take care of them in a small town where nobody ever leaves. Few people even get their GEDs. Now the child is 2 years old and fat. Has his own cupboard full of cookies, chips and macaroni and cheese. It's way past incredibly sad...those people have no idea what good nutrition means, they just get their food stamps and spend them as their families always have--cheap food that fills the belly. If the government is truly interested in preventing or curing child and adult obesity they will educate the people about good nutrition and financial accountability. Drink water instead of pop (soda), yogurt instead of pudding, rice cakes instead of potato chips--you'll notice that all these three things (just a sampling) substitutes the same texture and satisfaction than the unhealthy alternatives. Also, money goes farther by buying unhealthy food. Bellies are filled cheaper with junk food than with healthier alternative. The average food stamp recipient can feed their families and keep the hunger pangs away with high calorie and high carb junk food than if they bought healthy foods that would feed them for half that time. The government is seeking to control our lives and make us dependent, not benefit us. If they wanted to truly help us they would educate instead of mandate.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Feb 12
Well, I've always said that the government should limit what people can buy with food stamps (even when I was on them). There is a difference between regulating what taxpayer money can be used to buy and forcing parents to pay for food their kids won't eat, even after packing a lunch that is just as nutritional (or even more). Remember, in the example cited on the article, the turkey sandwich and banana were MORE nutritional than the 3 chicken nuggets the kid ended up eating.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Feb 12
So Mommyboo, when will you tell your boss you're willing to work for $1/hour?
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
18 Feb 12
The solution to the obesity problem has nothing to do with diet and food, it has to do with making physical activity/education mandatory in school again from preschool through college but that's neither here nor there. Taking away options ISN'T the solution either, although giving EQUAL value healthier options can be a way to help. The thing is though, people need to be able to get the same amount of healthy food for the same cost as getting junk. If you can buy 8 packages of ramen noodles for $1, you should also be able to get 5 lbs of rice for $1, or a pound of ground beef for $1, or a pound of apples for $1, or a pound of fresh broccoli for $1. You should be able to get a gallon of milk for $2 and fresh tomatoes for the same. If you only have $1 and you have to make it last a week, you will probably buy the ramen. I would.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
14 Feb 12
What is next? Will the government decide that parents can't care for their children properly and just take over raising them? According to one Michigan government worker "Parents don't know what is best for their children" She goes on to state that educators are trained and know what is best (educationally) for the children. http://www.twincitiesnewstalk.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&article=9757098 This is getting out of hand and we had better wake up and take our lives back from the government. The government does not know what is best for me or my family, they only know what is best for themselves and their personal power and wealth.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Feb 12
"The parents of the future will not only allow the government to raise their kids... they will insist the government do so."~ ParaTed2k's (Not So) Famous Sayings. The future is apparently not as far away as we think. (pun intended) ;~D
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
18 Feb 12
LOL! Any parent who would willingly EVER give up their inalienable rights to raise their own family and tell any and all others to butt out is not a real parent. My two cents... no pun intended either.
@KrauseHome (36448)
• United States
18 Feb 12
Wow!! Really... and these are sometimes parents just barely able to afford a roof over their heads, and food to feed themselves, let alone having to worry about what they can or cannot feed their child. These are the same ones being denied Food Stamps and help from the schools due to budget cuts or making too much money. Did they ever stop to think about if they are going to make such high demands such as this they need to find ways to help provide them as well?
1 person likes this
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
18 Feb 12
If the family is low income, they should be able to apply for free or reduced lunch and if they get accepted, then breakfast and lunch for the kids thru the school or daycare will be free. I still don't believe it's really a nutritionally sound option but hey, breakfast and lunch is breakfast and lunch, and for a family struggling to have enough to eat at home, that takes two meals per kid out of the rotation and might help them get by if they can't get food stamps. PS: even if they can't get free, reduced is often reasonable... maybe 40 or 50 cents vs the $2.25 of a regular lunch. The cost is NOT related to what you get, if I buy lunch at my daughter's school, because I'm an adult, I have to pay $3 and I don't get any other options or different extras, it's the same lunch she is able to get. It sucks lol.
@GardenGerty (157629)
• United States
14 Feb 12
When I worked at HeadSTart the kids did not bring food from home. Policy. It was a good one. Our nutrition head was required to plan to offer meals that met those guidelines, and more. A certain amount of vitamin A and C had to be offered during a week. Children were not required to eat the food, but it was a good opportunity to learn about new foods. They needed to put a bite of each food on their plate. They could have seconds until the food ran out. If a program receives money from the state or Federal government it needs to be accountable and spend the money wisely. On the other hand, once a child is in elementary school I would hope that food paid for by the family is just fine. When I had a licensed day care, I had to meet guidelines, in my home, as well, or I could not maintain my license. I was eligible for commodity distribution and Federal reimbursement for foods served. I do see that this goes further by being critical of family prepared meals, and that is really damaging to a kid's self esteem and their respect for their family values. Even if kids brought their own food, I did not want candy or junk or chips brought in. It created problems among the children.
@GardenGerty (157629)
• United States
15 Feb 12
I hate food waste of any kind. I also hate "know it alls" at any level who delight in bullying people at any level. Educators are not always smart or intelligent in any way, they are just "trained." Often their training is biased by where they are trained. If the turkey sandwich and banana was not complete, then another couple of items should have been offered to make it a complete meal.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Feb 12
Oh, I have no problem with guidelines set by the government, and daycare and preschools setting policies for the nutrition of the kids. You know the kids, you have met at least one parent. You and the parent can work together in helping the child learn nutritional lessons. However, this isn't a "guideline", nor do the bureaucrats who make these mandates know any of the kids. Furthermore, they took a perfectly healthy sandwich and banana, to give them chicken nuggets? Then they through away the food, and charged the parents for it? What kind of lessons did THAT teach?
1 person likes this
• United States
14 Feb 12
The mission of a school is to provide for the educational needs of their students. Serving them lunch is part of meeting those needs, assuming they haven't brought a lunch. However, if a student has been given a lunch by their parents, under no circumstances does the school have the right to tell the student that they can't eat the food that's in their bags. Why? Because the school can only act "in loco parentis", as in, in place of the parent. If the food is in that bag, it's clearly being endorsed by the parent, and the school has no right to do that.
2 people like this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
14 Feb 12
Here they already do that in the elementary schools. The parents will complain and especially when it comes to the snacks. It's not that difficult to pack a lunch containing all of those things but it's what they don't allow that has the parents in an uproar. They can pack a very healthy lunch but they are not allowed to throw in a bag of chips or a cookie or anything that is not considered, "healthy". I think it's horrible that our government is now controlling the lunches and snacks we send our kids to school with but ya know what...the parents allow this. I hear a lot of complaints but I don't work for the school or the government. They complain to all the wrong people. They complain, shrug and let it go and soon .It's been gradual but the government has taken over parent's rights but the parent's have let them.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Feb 12
Well, we're to the point where the government has assumed the authority to photograph our bodies and fondle us and our kids... so yeah, I agree.
• United States
15 Feb 12
The government shouldn't have to tell people how to feed their kids. This is just sad.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Feb 12
Oh, I don't think there is anything wrong with government guidelines and recommendations. But these aren't either. This is the government deciding what you can and can't feed your kids... and charging you for the food they force on your kids, without giving you any say in the matter. The food the kid in the example had was just fine.. in fact, better than what they replaced it with.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
14 Feb 12
This nanny-state crap is just getting more and more ridiculous every day. Still, this is another load of crap that will get rejected by BOTH sides since such rules would violate religious dietary restrictions as well as requiring vegan parents to feed their kids meat. I can't believe anyone trusts the government to tell us what food is best when they are notorious for changing their minds. Remember when all cholesterol was evil and carbs were wonderful?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Feb 12
I wondered about that. Apparently there are foods that are allowed as "substitutes", but the fact remains, the government is telling you what foods you can't feed your kids.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
18 Feb 12
This is ridiculous. This is why you use someone for child care that isn't a 'company' and doesn't have to be held to government mandates. You use community center preschools that also are not subject to government mandates. As far as this going on in public schools, I already saw something about this and nobody can tell me the school lunches are that great because they aren't. USDA guidelines are not that wonderful if you actually pay attention to what is served in a school lunch. I have only eaten lunch from the school cafeteria twice and both times it was rather sad and disgusting. No wonder my daughter prefers not to get hot lunch. Also, if they don't offer fresh veggie and fruit options, a lot of kids (including my daughter) will not eat it. She doesn't like canned fruit in syrup or cooked veggies from there because they are mushy and flavorless. She'll eat raw broccoli and carrots and apples, oranges, bananas, etc but it depends on the day whether those are available options or not. They also don't have bottled water, just milk and juice.
@bjc66bjc (6730)
• United States
14 Feb 12
Hi ParaTed, this is really really troubling to know that this is happening...What is going to happen next that we are not smart enough make a decision about... I can't believe that anyone would think that any parent would\ not want to provide the very best of anything to their children,, If they can't afford to buy this foods at home what make the school think they are willing to pay them for throwing out the lunch they have prepared for thier children...Whats next after that... This is ridiclous!!!!!!!
• United States
15 Feb 12
I believe it...dont u know we are just to stupid to be able to take care of our own children. sadly i new it was conmin i was paid by the gov to watch my nieces an nephews while my sister n law worked. long story short they kept reducing my check waiving the dollars to me that i would make 3 times more if id get my licence. it was tempting but i turned it down. why? Because they could come into my home anytime they wished. thier meals needed to b planned out weeks in advance an u best b followin it when they get there. activities scheduled every 15 minutes also needed to b followed strictly. also my dog was no longer welcome...each child had to have thier own hand towels in the bathroom even tho they share the same blood line guess its not sanitary to use the wrong towel..they each had to have thier own blanket an they couldnt share this is what i can think of off the top of my head.. sorry keep your cash this is my home...
• United States
15 Feb 12
I believe it...dont u know we are just to stupid to be able to take care of our own children. sadly i new it was conmin i was paid by the gov to watch my nieces an nephews while my sister n law worked. long story short they kept reducing my check waiving the dollars to me that i would make 3 times more if id get my licence. it was tempting but i turned it down. why? Because they could come into my home anytime they wished. thier meals needed to b planned out weeks in advance an u best b followin it when they get there. activities scheduled every 15 minutes also needed to b followed strictly. also my dog was no longer welcome...each child had to have thier own hand towels in the bathroom even tho they share the same blood line guess its not sanitary to use the wrong towel..they each had to have thier own blanket an they couldnt share this is what i can think of off the top of my head.. sorry keep your cash this is my home...
• United States
14 Feb 12
Agreed. I think we can take care of our own kids' nutrition, thank you very much.