Is there a racial undertone to the "socialism" claims by the McCain campaign, or
By ClarusVisum
@ClarusVisum (2163)
United States
October 30, 2008 11:36am CST
...is he just throwing words around hoping something will stick?
**
"John Judis made the case that the McCain campaign's argument about "spreading the wealth," "socialism," and "redistribution" is ultimately about race.
The argument, Judis said, "is aimed ultimately at white working class undecided voters who would construe "spreading the wealth" as giving their money to blacks. It's the latest version of Reagan's 'welfare queen' argument from 1980. It if it works, it won't be because most white Americans actually oppose a progressive income tax, but because they fear that Obama will inordinately favor blacks over them."
I perceive the rhetoric the same way. When McCain tells white working class undecided voters that Obama wants to "take your money and give it to someone else," he doesn't say who "someone else" is, but he probably hopes he doesn't have to.
Matt Feeney calls this approach "a bit loony," insisting that if McCain were really trying to engage in race-based fear mongering, the Republican campaign would "use the word 'welfare.'"
But that only helps to prove my point -- McCain has been using the word welfare. He's used it in his stump speech (Obama, McCain says, wants to turn the IRS into "a giant welfare agency"), and he's used it in his television ads.
And why would McCain tell white working class undecided voters that Obama's tax policies constitute "welfare" and "take your money and give it to someone else"? Here's a wild guess -- it has something to do with exploiting racial fears." -- http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015441.php
***
What do you think, especially considering the use of the term "welfare" in these attacks?
3 people like this
7 responses
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
30 Oct 08
ClarusVisum,
Just exactly when did welfare become a program predisposed to the black race? I always thought it was a "safety-net" for people who had fallen on rough times! But I had wondered when the race-baiters would get into action in this campaign. I guess McCain closing in at the polls pushed them over the top! I have known quite a few people in my time of ALL races and genders who have been helped by welfare and conversley I have also known those who have abused it and let it become a crutch and an enabler for them to excuse not having the drive and ambition to get up, get out and find work.
1 person likes this
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
30 Oct 08
"ClarusVisum,Just exactly when did welfare become a program predisposed to the black race?"
It didn't, but the "welfare queen" argument framed it that way (even though most recipients of welfare are white), and that is the point. It's part of the racial stereotype, even though we both know it's not really true.
5 people like this
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
30 Oct 08
Would you care to reveal a source of your information regarding your statement that most welfare recipients are white?
@soooobored (1184)
• United States
30 Oct 08
Hmm... one is upset at the implication that welfare recipients are black, the other upset at the implication that welfare recipients are white. I don't think you can win here, Clarus!! 

@grandpa_lash (5225)
• Australia
31 Oct 08
"... is he just throwing words around...."
In respect of the socialist tag, yes, clearly, because Obama is nothing like a socialist, and I say this as someone from a country currently ruled by a semi-socialist party. Thank the Gods.
I can see your point about the racism, but I suspect that it is, as Adrenochrome has pointed out, aimed as much at the total underclass, not just the black element of it.
Lash
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
30 Oct 08
So blacks are the only people who receive welfare? When did this start happening? I agree with McCain that handing out all those "tax breaks" to people who don't even work or pay in taxes amounts to welfare checks. I also disagree with Obama that taxation of the haves to give to the have-nots is just "neighborliness" or "doing one's patriotic duty." The truth is neighborliness had nothing to do with forced giving and patriotic duty has nothing to do with taxation. Obama just likes to use honorable words to try and describe his dishonorable plans for the USA. McCain is telling the truth about all this, and I say more power to him.

@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
30 Oct 08
Taxes definitely are forced giving, but it still has nothing to do with neighborliness.
@sharra1 (6340)
• Australia
1 Nov 08
You cannot give tax cuts to people who do not pay tax. Mind you the ultra rich never pay much tax as they have tax havens and clever accountants making sure that they have almost no income to tax at least as far as the tax office is concerned. I mean they are so poor they are living the lives of multimillionaires and then say of you cannot tax me more I am too poor. They do it in my country as well. There are so many ways to avoid tax if you are rich and none if you are poor.
No of course no one should be forced to give they should be photographed while handing over a small amount of money on a giant sized check that helps no one just so people can see what goody goodies they are.
These rich people get rich out of other people, they should be forced to give some of it back to their country through tax and the country should look after the people that are now starving because the rich guy sacked the to keep his profits up.
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
30 Oct 08
"So blacks are the only people who receive welfare?"
This has already been asked and answered, right above you. Read before you ask the same exact thing again.
"The truth is neighborliness had nothing to do with forced giving"
All taxes are "forced giving", and many taxes go to social services that are good for everyone, like police and fire departments.
5 people like this

@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
30 Oct 08
Of course! All who oppose Obama are racists! Everything we say is some secret White Person CODE for racism. That one, Joe Sixpack, Hockey Mom, welfare, and now, Socialism, are ALL racist codewords designed to attack black people. Give me a f%cking break Clarus. I can't believe anyone is stupid enough to believe that talking about socialism is somehow racist. Now I'm not an expert on Africa, but exactly how many African nations are Socialist? Last I checked socialism was primarily practiced in European nations that were predominately white.
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
31 Oct 08
Another person who doesn't know what a dichotomy or a question mark is. Sigh.
3 people like this
@goldeneagle (6743)
• United States
30 Oct 08
The democrats want to set up government agencies to "monitor" (read MANAGE) the big industries in our country...that is the VERY DEFINITION of socialism...I don't think there are any racial intentions there at all...I think it is more a fact of knowing what the democrats plan to try and do...
Taking money from hard-working people and giving it to those too lazy to work is EXACTLY what the welfare program does. The DEMOCRATS thought the welfare program up too by the way. I went to back to school for two years and earned a degree so that I could try to get a better job making more money so that I could try to get a better house for my family to live in...one with better insulation and more room than the 16'x40' 1960's model mobile home we were living in. I earned my degree...I got my better house (nothing fancy, but it is twice as big as the place we were in and it has better insulation and A LOT more room)...AND as an additional reward for my two years of hard work and determination...I got to pay MORE TAXES...I get the "pleasure" of watching even more of the money I work hard to make being taken from me knowing they are giving MORE of my money to those who are too lazy to work. I get this pleasure of seeing my money taken from me, and I have something else that goes along with it...I have a physical handicap. However, I can't get disability, because I have a little pride in myself and I get out and try to help myself instead of sitting on my A$S waiting for a handout. So the price I pay for not being a deadbeat is that I can't even get partial disability to help pay the bills, even though the handicap I have severely limits the types of work I can do. My wife and I "make too much money" for me to get any help paying my bills, even though the only job I can find is one that is part-time in a restaurant. SO, I get to work what few hours they give me, AND I get to come home at night barely able to walk because the physical limitations I have make it hard for me to stay on my feet for long periods of time. I get to wake up every morning barely able to walk when I get out of bed. In order to get disability, I would probably have to completely quit working for several months while I tried to go through all of the red tape the government throws at you when you apply, even though it is MEDICALLY DOCUMENTED that this is a permanent condition that is only going to get worse. I am still not sure I would get it if they looked at my wife's income, and even then, I don't know if it would be enough to live on. During this time, I would probably also lose my house, my truck, and my credit cards would probably all try to sue me because I couldn't pay them...SO I really can't even afford to try to get help, especially not knowing if I could get it to begin with, and I surely can't afford a lawyer to help out...
I told you all that to tell you this....I am TIRED of money that I bust my A$S for every day being taken from me and given to people who are too damn lazy to work. I have no problem at all paying taxes to pay for things like national security, better roads, better (and hopefully CLEANER and GREENER) electricity and water, etc. These things are necessary and they make our lives better. What I DO mind is my money being taken from me and given to some low life that lays around getting drunk and high all day while my welfare dollars pay their bills and buy their groceries. What I DO mind is people getting welfare checks, while at the same time working "under-the-table" (in other words...getting paid in cash off the record so they pay NO taxes on what they earn) and driving 30-40 thousand dollar cars, while my hard earned money buys their groceries.

@sharra1 (6340)
• Australia
31 Oct 08
Monitoring industries to ensure that they do not exploit, rip off, anyone is not socialism. Socialism is owning said industry not monitoring it to ensure it is not exploiting people. Mind you I would argue that if it was not monitored it would try and rip off, exploit anyone it could.
As to disability, that is the same in many countries. Australia has a good welfare system but the right wing government has made it almost impossible to get. We did vote them out of office but things have not changed yet. I wish. I am medically documented to have a disability illness but I am in limbo because of the right wing former government who wanted to scrap all disability help.
I do not agree that welfare people are too lazy too work, there are people who pay tax in my country who would argue that I am making it all up because I do not look disabled or sick. I am not bedridden or in a wheelchair. Don't judge.
As to the government being cheated that is up to their police systems to check. We have quite a tough one. We, being Australia. As for working while being disabled, I cannot work and have not been able to work for 2 years. I cannot get disability support because they fear that everyone is trying to rip the government off. I have medical certificates to prove that.
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
30 Oct 08
In short, you're saying regulation = socialism. How absurd.
Greenspan acknowledged the "flaw" in seeking total deregulation (http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/bookman/stories/2008/10/27/bookmaned_1027_2DOT.html ). Why won't you?
If someone pays no taxes, they won't (literally can't) get a tax cut--Obama's cut will go to working people, so I don't know where you got this nutty idea that a tax cut is (or even CAN be) a handout to people "too lazy to work" since you can't cut non-existent taxes.
4 people like this

@newtondak (3946)
• United States
30 Oct 08
Everything that happens that isn't to your liking in this world IS NOT racism.
When it comes to the "spreading the wealth" scenario, I can tell you that there are plenty of people of all races in this country who are living off the tax dollars of the working middle class.
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
30 Oct 08
"Everything that happens that isn't to your liking in this world IS NOT racism."
Nice distortion, straw man builder. Where did I say anything even CLOSE to that?
I quoted an interesting perspective, and posted it here to get people's reactions/thoughts. That's all.
3 people like this
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
30 Oct 08
There is no need for name calling - if you can't respond in a respectful manner please refrain from responding!
I responded as I did because the primary thread of most of your posts pertains to something in the news and how you perceive it as racism.
@grandpa_lash (5225)
• Australia
31 Oct 08
How amusing - "Straw man builder" is name-calling? I would have said it was merely descriptive.
Lash
1 person likes this
@soooobored (1184)
• United States
30 Oct 08
I don't know that any racism sent out by McCain is intentional, I think it might be taken as racist by some. Opponents to Obama's plan do point to welfare a lot, but for them it isn't about race, it's about freeloading.






