Newt Says Sarah "Needs to be More Careful"...

@anniepa (27955)
United States
January 18, 2011 6:53pm CST
In an interview with ABC News, Newt Gingrich said Sarah Palin's recent statements indicate she needs to "be more careful and think through what she's saying and how she's saying it." Said Gingrich: "There's no question that she has become more controversial." http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/01/18/gingrich_says_palin_needs_to_be_more_careful.html Wow, if Newt Gingrich thinks Sarah Palin's controversial, she MUST be pretty darned controversial, wouldn't you say? You can see the whole interview here: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/vote-2012-contenders-newt-gingrich-12636585 Of course, it only really matters whether she's "controversial" or not if she indeed plans on running for President, right? In fact, if remaining a celebrity and becoming an even bigger - and WEALTHIER - "star" is what she really wants, isn't she better off the more controversial she becomes? What do you think...is she dumb like a fox or just plan dumb...lol? Annie
3 people like this
12 responses
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Jan 11
Hi Annie - have I mentioned lately that you ARE my favorite source for Sarah Palin news? I would have no idea what she was doing with out you! Thank you. I find her inspiring! I wouldnt put much credence into what Gingrich says. Ya know, I find it amusing that the Palin haters like to accuse her of master minding and manipulating but then in the same breath say she is stupid. Very telling.
@laglen (19759)
• United States
20 Jan 11
by "haters" I dont necessarily mean the extreme word hate, rather the slang "haters" I am referring to people here on mylot as well as pundits etc.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Jan 11
What "Palin haters" are you referring to? I hope you didn't mean me because, as I've said many times, "hate" is an extreme word I rarely use and as irritating and exasperating as I consider Palin to be it doesn't qualify as "hatred". Annie
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Jan 11
She's the Howard Stern of politics, Annie, because she knows she's no longer relevant. She'll never run for public office, and I don't believe she ever planned to, but as long as she's stirring the pot she keeps her name and her face out there. As long as it's out there, there's money to be made and that's her driving force. So, I vote for dumb like a fox.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Jan 11
She puts something up on Twitter and it make international news... tell me again how she isn't relevant? ROFL! That's like saying John Lennon may have been known for a few ditties, but was never relevant as a musician. :~D
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 Jan 11
You know, Ted, you've posted some rather odd comments in the past but to compare Palin with John Lennon? What are you smoking? Palin is like an accident on the interstate...that does not make her relevant. But, continue to hang onto her every word and tweet if it helps you get through the day.
1 person likes this
@jb78000 (15139)
20 Jan 11
justin bieber is bigger than palin on twitter.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
25 Jan 11
Being unpolished and controversial has a charming quality, but that quality can be very short lived. Being a polished speaker and a mainstream personality will always win the day in the long run. Sarah Palin has made herself a success may being as unpolished and as controversial as she possible could be.What Sarah fails to understand, and what Newt does, is that her unpolished behavior acts like sand paper, it will rub you raw.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
26 Jan 11
Well put! I think I've been rubbed about as raw as I care to be, to be honest. Annie
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Jan 11
Maybe that's why many Conservatives consider Palin a viable candidate, but not Gingrich.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Jan 11
I can think of a few people I hope to see run. If either of them run, then no, Palin won't get my vote... and the field would have to be pretty rough for me to support Gingrich in the primaries.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Jan 11
That's a HUGE relief...lol! Annie
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Jan 11
I think the "many" conservatives have dwindled down to a "very few" according to the polls I've seen lately. For the record, I'm no conservative (no sh1t, right...lol?) but I don't think Gingrich is a viable candidate either! Annie
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
19 Jan 11
So does Sarah Palin think that Newt Gingrich is "too controversial?" As far as her speech goes "blood libel" was probably an inspired touch. It really isn't that controversial a phrase. As far as her running for President, she better do it soon. Time is running out. Only a year and 11 months left till election time. But I seriously doubt an announcement is forthcoming. I still think she should wait until 2016 if she does run.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Jan 11
I'm sure she'll let us know soon enough what she thinks of Gingrich...lol! Personally, I think he's the last person who should be talking about anyone, but that's just me. We'll have to agree to disagree about her use of "blood libel". I'm pretty well convinced she hadn't a clue what it meant when she made her video, she simply copied it from a WSJ column thinking it would make her sound intelligent. Annie
@trruk1 (1028)
• United States
26 Jan 11
"Blood libel" is a terrible thing to say. At least, it would be if I said it, but then I know what it means. Sarah Palin obviously was fed that line by one of her writers, and she has no clue. but terms that are unfamiliar to some carry a lot of weight with those who feel insulted or attacked by them. A man running for the Senate in Virginia a few years back lost the race after calling a man a racial slur at a campaign stop. Most Americans did not even know the term (it is from North Africa) but the man he said it to knew it. and so did the candidate, because his wife is from the country where that particular term is used.
• United States
26 Jan 11
Frankly, I really hadn't heard the term used before at least in a political arena. I will admit, I haven't researched that particular phrase. So, for me personally, it wasn't an offensive term. However, since then, I can see where the phrase originated from and now understand more about its origins. I can understand where the insult came in. I did say that it probably was an inspired thought. Not all of those inspired thoughts work out as planned. Unfortunately, another Senator of the opposite side picked up the word. I really hope that it doesn't spread any more.
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
19 Jan 11
It's times like this I really miss Molly.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Jan 11
OK, I'll bite - who's Molly? Annie
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
20 Jan 11
And you call yourself a liberal? For shame, Annie! LOL Molly Ivins.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Jan 11
It's interesting that you respect and quote Newt Gingrich, which I am sure is not just because he's talking about Sarah Palin. I think Newt can confidently answer your question. Newt Says: she has become more controversial Newt Means: I am running for president and I don't want her running against me Did you watch the whole interview? I mean, did you catch the part where Newt said "But she is still a phenomenon. I don't know anybody else in American politics who can put something on Twitter or put something on Facebook and automatically have it become a national story. So she remains, I think, a very formidable person in her own right."? Newt said "phenomenon" and he didn't say she's a phenomenon as a celebrity or star, he said she's a phenomenon in "America politics". He didn't say she was just plain dumb...lol
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Jan 11
Good one, Rollo...I respect Newt Gingrich! Not hardly! Yes, I did watch the entire interview. I don't recall him saying the words, "She's a phenomenon in "America politics"," but I could be mistaken. Whatever, we all know she's a "celebrity", famous for being famous, kind of like Paris Hilton but without the high morals and kind heart. Annie
• United States
19 Jan 11
You bring up an interesting point. Have you heard anything from any of the other potential candidates? The only other one who I have heard from is Mike Huckabee and that's because he has his own tv show. But even he isn't catching much air time outside of that. Everyone else has been strangely quiet.
@Rollo1 (16676)
• Boston, Massachusetts
19 Jan 11
The funny thing is that "but she's still a phenomenon" wasn't a whole new sentence, it was the end of the "There is no question that she has become more controversial" sentence. Actually he said it like this: "There is no question that she has become more controversial, but she is still a phenomenon." It's weird that you heard the first part of the sentence and not the second part. Congratulations, Annie. You are now capable of editing quotes even as you hear them, you no longer need to get left-wing bloggers or MSNBC talking heads to edit them to skew the meaning for you, you can do it for yourself. You are now qualified to write for the HuffPo or Daily Kos. It's dangerous not to watch the clip for yourself. You don't mention what question Newt was answering when he made the remarks and it makes a difference to understanding the context of his remarks. Always go to the next level beyond the quick summing up by a blogger or other source with an agenda. Go to the video, go to the transcript. I hate filtered, pre-digested news, only the raw stuff has any intellectual nutrition left in it.
@jerzgirl (9384)
• United States
19 Jan 11
Personally, I think she's a little of both. She's definitely not the brightest bulb in the box, but she knows she has a following who think she walks on water, so I do think she pushes their buttons knowingly. Whether for political gain or just a need for attention, I won't venture to guess, but I do think she is capable of deliberate manipulation of the masses as well as a clear level of cluelessness.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Jan 11
Who'd have ever guessed that the lack of intelligence would be one of the most "endearing" qualities in a potential Presidential candidate to some people? I keep waiting to see some sign of a real caring, feeling person in there but so far I sure haven't seen it. Annie
@yoyo1198 (3641)
• United States
19 Jan 11
Hi, annie.....I don't think sp is dumb. I think she is just ignorant. She is unaware of what it means to fulfill a commitment and she is so totally unaware of respecting others' viewpoints. I don't think she knew what 'blood libel' meant until after she read it in her video. As for Newt's remarks, it's like the pot calling the kettle black. Sp is so polarizing that I truly do not believe that the Repub's will run her.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Jan 11
I don't think they'll run her either. There was a time I thought maybe they would, but I think that ship has sailed. All reasonably intelligent Republicans know she's not electable and that she IS possibly the most polarizing person in the nation, if not the world, today. Annie
@ebuscat (5935)
• Philippines
19 Jan 11
For me it is needed so that you feel good in your life and happy to love it.
@trruk1 (1028)
• United States
20 Jan 11
Her attitude is a problem for her, but that attitude is almost universal among the right wing. Never admit to any error. Never, never, never. All she had to do when some folks griped about the crosshairs on her Website was to say they might be misunderstood and they will be taken down. Instead, she lashes out. It is the Republican way: when you screw up, attack the people who pointed it out. If they would just act like adults for a while and admit to mistakes on occasion, it would make them more believable. But anybody who claims never to have been wrong about anything is lying.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
26 Jan 11
I think that's my number one problem with her: I've never heard her admit or acknowledge a single mistake. She truly tries to pass herself off as flawless. The poor little miss perfect everyone always picks on! Annie
@gladys46 (1205)
• United States
19 Jan 11
Annie, I say just plain dumb!! How "Newt" emerged such a contributing "expert" politically, I'll never understand! And, how one Ms. Palin could ever be considered presidentially worthy is beyond me! This is a person who reneged on her oath to the people of an entire state ... she merely dropped her responsibilities not just to a district within that state .. the entire state!!! Why, 'cause it was just too hard to focus on the duties she swore to manage among many other excuses. What is it that says she will be able to function as this nation's president? Surely, with all the stresses placed upon any US president the nation should be focused on one with at least the temperment to process, process and absorb what is obviously hard work.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Jan 11
You betcha...lol! If she thinks being governor of the state with the nation's smallest population, or close to it if it isn't, was hard and came with a lot of aggravation and heat, I can' imagine how she'd fare as President of the ENTIRE United States! Then there's the small matter of her not considering all of us to be "real Americans". Annie