Do Not Comply?

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
March 16, 2012 12:39pm CST
Matthew 6:24 In the Bible teaches that no man can serve two masters. So, if your President orders you to do something that is against His laws, do you obey? Or do you stand by the law of God and obey God? Is this sort of thing happening today? Do governments order us to do things that are against God's law?
6 people like this
20 responses
@SinfulRose (3527)
• Davao, Philippines
16 Mar 12
I do not have two masters no matter what others say. I serve only the being who is greater than man and that is who I believe is God. I'm just not an avid follower because I believe my function is different in this modern world. If ever a certain leader would order me to do something that is against my morals, well, the result is certainly clear. "Who is he to order me around when even my mother cannot even make me obey to just washing the dishes?" And washing dishes is an amoral...Do you get what I mean? "I am no servant to any human unless if that human is someone who my God wants me to serve..."--that's the simplest way to put it.
1 person likes this
• Davao, Philippines
16 Mar 12
At least they won't kill me. And thank God, I don't have kids.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Yea, thats what they said in Germany in the thirties. Are you convinced it would never happen here?
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
16 Mar 12
Sounds like you'd have no problem standing up to a law that went against your conscience. Good for you. Now, what if they were going to put you in prison and take away your kids?
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
16 Mar 12
I would not knowingly do something against my moral convictions and yet I am being forced to fund abortions if the new health insurance laws are to be believed. The only way to avoid it is to move out of the country. Likewise, my tax dollars are used to teach Chinese "working" girls to drink responsibly, or to study the behavior of similar male workers in Vietnam? We are already passively consenting to things we morally object to. I'll bet every U.S. citizen can find some way their tax dollars are spent that violates their religion if they would do it personally. However, that's a bit different from a direct order. If I was pregnant and my president told me I must get an abortion because my child tested positive for Down Syndrome I would refuse. Or if he/she told me I must do something else that violates my moral code I would refuse. At least, I hope I would have the integrity to refuse. We never know what we will do until it actually happens.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
16 Mar 12
What about just not paying the taxes?
2 people like this
@dragon54u (31636)
• United States
16 Mar 12
That would violate God's law. Pay unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and to God what is God's. I would love to refuse to pay taxes but with me in federal prison who would take care of my grandchild? There are many people who depend on me and I think I can do more good on the outside. However, I dare not protest at a rally where the speaker is protected by the SS, ya know? Taxes were supposed to be temporary. No collection of money is ever temporary with this dishonorable government.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Yea, I didn't think of that. You'd think I'd remember seeing as our President quoted scripture to get more taxes from the businessmen in our country. You know, the job creators. That is what has been on my mind. Do you disobey and try to take care of family the best you can, or do you not comply and go to prison. I really think that is what we are facing in the near future. And yes, did you know that the income tax ammendment was possibly not ratified legally? Some ex IRS lawyers have tested it, didn't work for them.
1 person likes this
@jdyrj777 (6530)
• United States
17 Mar 12
This same problem came when the apostles of Jesus went around preaching the good news of the Kingdom after Jesus was killed. The high priest questioned them and Peter and the other apostles answered them. "In answer Peter and the other apostles said; We must obey God as ruler rather than men." Acts 5:29 Acts 5:17-32 Obey the laws as long as it doesnt conflict with God's law then you follow God's law instead.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
Thank you for the references. Appreciate you taking the time to do that for us.
@topffer (42156)
• France
16 Mar 12
It is a matter of conscience, and I want to have a clear conscience, but I am not sure I can say "no" : I am very legalistic, and if a law orders me to do something against God's law, I will have a difficult decision to take. I suppose it will depend if it has important consequences or no. I have had a job in the past where I had to serve two masters. I did it honestly without loving or hating one master more than the other, but it is really not easy to have sometimes the feeling to be caught between two stools.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Well, according to my beliefs, the consequenses of disobeying God last a lot longer than disobeying the government, or man's laws. Still, it would be difficult seeing as I have family to think about.
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Mar 12
People normally make the choice they believe serves them best. If you truly believe in something you won't go against it to satisfy someone else. Having to make a hard choice will show you what you truly believe. What I really think we're seeing is the begining of a police state in which government will make infringing laws based on the wantsvof a group. However, this isn't really new, it follows a 100 year old precedent of making laws based on ideals. The only difference now is that there is no longer an overwhelming majority that shares very similar beliefs. Its the first stage of a pandoras box thag was opened before our time, and kept open because the majority of people enjoyed its perks. But soon we'll see the monster it created.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
I knew there was a reason I liked you!!! You said that very well.
1 person likes this
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
16 Mar 12
I think it is easier to answer this question.Any religious person will tell you that he follows the law of God.Unfortunately the reality is a lot different and we all follow the human laws even if we don`t really realize this. I think the direction is clear.Every person must be forced to obey the law of our government.There are 2 ways to do it.One is through a conflict,we may see a conflict between the state and religion in our life time or the next generations life time.The second way is through indoctrination and it works.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
16 Mar 12
Force of law, the threat of punishment or fine. That is how government works. People don't realize it, but that is how it is.
1 person likes this
• Thailand
17 Mar 12
What are god's laws and where can they be found? The problem is that there is no agreed upon source or any clear and definitive statement as to what those laws are. If we leave it open to every individual to make their on discussion as to what god's laws are we end up with a state of anarchy.
• Thailand
17 Mar 12
Whether the laws of the United States were ever based on Christian principles is a whole other subject. What you seem to be advocating here is an individual determination of what god's laws are.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Christians trust the Bible as their authority. The Jews the Torah. There is no division there, they are the same. Except a Jew may have a problem if asked to bow the knee to Jesus, which I don't think the government will ask him to do. Christian principles and laws based on God's laws ran this country for about two centuries. There was no anarchy.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
In fact, we are closer to anarchy now that we've stopped listening to God's laws as the basis for our judicial system.
1 person likes this
17 Mar 12
Don't take any notice of me I am an atheist but I believe it says the bible that Jesus was asked this sort of question and he said "render to Caesar that which are Caesar's and render to god that which are god's." or words to that effect. There is always the point that the President was elected to give orders and how do you know that the person telling you what is god's law is telling the truth
19 Mar 12
"who is the ultimate authority?" That is easy in such cases you are. You decide for yourself.
19 Mar 12
I am not sure I can help you much with that. I have only been in a situation once when I thought I was going to die. What I can tell you it that I did not worry about anything except how I was going to get out of the situation and I did not look to any god to save my life I had to do it myself.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
http://www.openbible.info/topics/shadrach_meshac_and_abednego Acts 5:29 But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men. The verse you are refering to was Jesus telling his disciples to pay the taxes that the occuping Romans levied on them. It was his way of saying that governments has temporal power over us, but God has power over governments. So who is the ultimate authority?
1 person likes this
• Australia
17 Mar 12
The President has objective reality and can punish you NOW. Lash
@alottodo (3056)
• Australia
17 Mar 12
Yea right we are all doomed!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
We are discussing whether it would be worth disobeying to a person who believes God is the ultimate authority and will hold us accountable. It is not about punishment of the body, but punishment of the soul, or if you prefer, the conscience of a man and living with himself and his choices.
1 person likes this
• Australia
19 Mar 12
I'm with Thoreau on this: If your government does or orders something against your conscience, it is your RESPONSIBILITY to disobey. By the same token, if your Church orders you to do something that goes against your conscience, you have an equal responsibility to disobey your church. And how do we justify this? Because the men who run your government and the men who run your church are only men, not the Holy arbiters of what is right and wrong. And I should add, please, nobody bring up the shibboleth of Holy F*cking scripture, which is demonstrably only the insane ramblings of other, potentially totally fallible men. The final arbiter is your own conscience, which may be somewhat anarchic of me but then I come from the arrogant intellectual elite and have total confidence in my ability to judge right and wrong, at least in most circumstances. When I don't consider I know enough to judge, I go looking for those who do, but that won't be either politicians or priests. Even when I was a young and highly committed Christian (I was going to enter an Anglican seminary) I couldn't accept some of the things I was supposed to believe and follow, which is why I not only didn't enter the seminary but eventually became an atheist. And a lifetime of observation and sometimes sufferingbecause of politics and politicians has convinced me that my early decision to eschew voting (it is compulsory in Australia) was absolutely correct - voting only encourages the slimy turds. Lash
@alottodo (3056)
• Australia
17 Mar 12
At the end of the day I do not comply with a lot of things!Gods laws are made by men and men only just to comply with the way they think! no one as far as I know have spoken to God it self[ and I say it self, because God it's an entity ] a being, a formless mass which is not male or female] so when I Am living here I Am bound to follow the civil laws of the country I Am in.
• Australia
20 Mar 12
I have avoided this issue to date, but I have to say that for me your question poses no dilemma because I simply don't believe that God is the ultimate authority, or any authority at all. J.S Mill once said that you don't have to be stupid to be a conservative, but most conservatives are stupid, and I have tended to apply this to religious believers as well. Clearly some are highly intelligent, and your writing here tells me you are also intelligent, but how intelligent people can believe in the face of the evidence from the history of religion even if not common sense is totally bewildering. The younger me still bewilders me in this respect. Humanity has had Gods for all recorded history, and the archeological record tells us that long before writing we had religion. In that time there have been literally thousands of Gods (and Goddesses), and each culture has believed its God(s) to be the only true God(s). In their various names millions of people have been tortured and slaughtered; I will concede that millions have also received solace from their beliefs. How and what we believe (or don't believe) is purely a product of the time, place, and culture we are born into, although we can individually transcend those factors if we wish. So how do contemporary Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc. justify claiming that all those that went before were wrong, and that only today's Christian/Jew/Muslim etc. has it right? And if the claim is made that modern Man is more advanced, I'd have to point out that every development of today's world had it's genesis in the intelligence of forebears going back millennia. Today's engineers are still trying to work out how "primitive" cultures like the Egyptians (who incidentally practised serious surgery) or the early Britons could build edifices like the pyramids or Stonehenge, or how primitive South Sea Islanders could develop navigation systems that work just as well as today's without the sniff of a sextant or a map. We are no more intelligent now than we ever were. In my more sanguine moments I will concede the possibility of Intelligent Design, but to imagine that any such designer bears the slightest resemblance to any of the dieties humanity has created (in its own contemporary image) I find ludicrous. Or the possibility that the designer even recognises our existence any more than we recognise the existence of ants. So no, sorry Debra, I can't come at God as the ultimate authority, which only leaves me to consider what I have to do about political commands. Lash
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
Not if you believe God DID make laws for man to follow. Like, do no murder, do not steal, do not lie, do not lust after your neighbor's goods or wife. OR the big one, have no other gods before YHWH, The God. And btw, I talk to God everyday. He answers me too. In a still small voice called my conscience. God being the ultimate authority in the universe, and I, being a citizen of that universe, should I put man's laws above the laws of the Creator of the Universe? Even if you truly feel God is a formless mass, which may be; He is an intelligent formless mass and as stated, the ultimate authority.
@iuliuxd (4453)
• Romania
20 Mar 12
Today's engineers are still trying to work out how "primitive" cultures like the Egyptians (who incidentally practised serious surgery) or the early Britons could build edifices like the pyramids or Stonehenge. That is not hard to explain.I know an engineer who went to Greece and when he came back he said " People claim the ancient men were advanced builders...well...all they have built was a bunch of ruins ".
@webearn99 (1742)
• India
17 Mar 12
This is the exact reason why the church and the state need to function as separate entities. Religion is necessary for the values and the discipline it teaches us. There are some things in life which need us to think and act out of the box. If my beliefs were to tell me that blood transfusion was a sin, I would still go ahead and do it if someone's life was at risk and am prepared to face the tag of a sinner. My logic is that my sin of transfusion will be completely compensated by my good deed of saving a life. I am ready to be judged and condemned by fellow humans but am confident that what I did will find favor with my maker. I think it is the same with the orders the executives hand to us.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
That puts the government in the position of deciding what religious beliefs ought to be. And if they can do that, they can decide YOU are wrong, no? My father used to say to us kids, I may not agree with everything you say, but I will die for your right to say it. It applies to beliefs as well as words we speak, I think. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
My faith is not blind. I have and still do think about and investigate the reasons why I believe what I do. What I am seeing is 'secularism' is blindly followed by the majority of Americans and faith in God is dismissed as unecessary. You are correct that in America everyone has the right to follow their conscience. If that means NOT believing in a 'religion' or believing in a religion that is not Christian, they have that right and it is respected by the laws. That is changing.
1 person likes this
@JohnRok1 (2051)
17 Mar 12
God's law is what the Bible actually says, not what "Jehovah's Witnesses" twist it to say. Governments cannot be under a moral obligation to tolerate the actions of everyone who is sincerely wrong, however sincerely they may be so. What they may tolerate is a matter for discussion.
@samar54 (2454)
• Egypt
23 Mar 12
That man must obey his creator does but for the governments are often ordered in not obey a creature as opposed to God is, violation of the law of God .. God guide them .
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
23 Mar 12
Governments are suppose to protect the rights of man. Often times, they don't. Often times their only goal is power.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
23 Mar 12
@samar54 (2454)
• Egypt
23 Mar 12
I agree with you
@factorial (977)
• Philippines
16 Mar 12
Yes! our former president before gave orders to her cabinet members that are against the laws of God! Now that former president is sick... and is confined in a hospital... she is actually in hospital arrest because she faces numerous cases... from graft and corruption to plunder.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
16 Mar 12
Let me ask, knowing the Philippines is a mostly Catholic country, if your president demanded the Catholic church give out free birth control and the morning after pill (an abortion pill) to those who worked for the church, would you think that was wrong and would the church comply with government wishes or refuse?
1 person likes this
• Davao, Philippines
16 Mar 12
What did GMA order her cabinet members to do that is against God's law, factorial? @debrakcary: The church is the first one to go against such a law before it can be passed down. The president is not there to be a dictator so even he/she has to pass laws under the legislature unless if the President declares Martial Law under emergency--which he/she has no reason to do if what he/she wants is only to pass birth control kits. The Churchs in the Philippines are so traditional that they would stick to the religious law as much as they can. Most Churches do not believe in the separation of Church and Estate so most of the issues in politics they even take as a responsibility that's why it's hard to pass a certain law here in the Philippines that can benefit us in a long term because people here don't want to take risks.
@JohnRok1 (2051)
17 Mar 12
Unless a law is in the Scripture, or commanded by parents/secular authorities and not against Scripture, it is not God's law.
• Indonesia
16 Mar 12
no, the truth must be upheld because, no one thing,including a president who can be make us defy the laws of god
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Its not me I worry about, it's my kids. I know God can do miracles for them. I need more faith, I guess. I believe in the truth. I want to do the right thing, just being brutally honest here, when I really think about it, I'm afraid.
1 person likes this
• Indonesia
17 Mar 12
why not,
@dawnald (85135)
• Shingle Springs, California
16 Mar 12
Well being as there are different religions, there are different versions of what God's law is. But if the government orders you to do something you believe to be against God's law (sending a Quaker to Afghanistan?), you have the unpalatable choice of deciding whether to listen to your conscience, which may have legal (or more severe) consequences, or follow the law, which might get you in trouble with your church and your God. It takes a very brave individual to stand up for what you believe in when the opponent is not only more powerful than you, but has no interest in treating you decently. Hi, how are you doing?
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
16 Mar 12
Hi Dawnald, I'm good. Working part time weekends while finishing school. How are YOU? I hope you and the kids are doing well. Is life settling down a bit now for you? Did you find a house? As to the discussion, it is very difficult. Not to mention the social implications when people believe you to be a law breaker or worse. I believe we will be seeing some arrests or huge fines in the years to come in our country due to Obamacare.
1 person likes this
@bellis716 (4799)
• United States
18 Mar 12
That subject has been covered in the bible, both in the old testament and the new testament. You should read the book of Daniel in the old testament. Now, this was a time when God talked directly to some of His prophets, but Daniel was ready to accept the consequences. In the new testament, Acts 5:29 states " Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than man. You might want to read the entire story , beginningg with verse 17.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
19 Mar 12
I have, that is what has inspired me to post this discussion.
@2004cqui (2812)
• United States
16 Mar 12
Ya know I was going to answer this question but, after reading Dawnald's I just can't do it, I couldn't say it better, I could never have answered it better! wwwwwaaaaaa!!!!!!!!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
23 Mar 12
yeah, she's pretty awesome.
• United States
16 Mar 12
Well, I don’t know… but doesn’t the bible tell us to obey the government. I forget how it is worded actually. I can’t think of anything in which a president has asked us to do that is against the law of God, actually. Knowing this president we have, I wouldn’t doubt that there are some laws made that do violate God’s law, but I just am not well versed in them.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
The Bible says render unto ceasar what is ceasar's and unto God, what is God's. But if we are true followers of God, we belong to Him fully, don't you think? I'm thinking of the Catholic's problem about the free birth control. Do they cave in and obey the law, or do they stand their ground and pay the huge fines, that will not go away?
1 person likes this
@averygirl72 (37764)
• Philippines
16 Mar 12
I think that is such a difficult situation when you need to choose between God and your earthly leaders. This is similar to the story in the Bible, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego where they chose to follow God's law and prefer to be thrown in a furnace than to worship the statue.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Could us modern folks do as they did? And would God honor our obedience with an angel if we did?
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Mar 12
This is a good discussion and reading through how true it is that God has given us a will and each one of us chooses to do the will of their own or obey the will of God. I personally will follow God's law, because his law will always be the same and even though we live in this world as a Christian we are not of this world and we all have our own choices and I pray we all make the right one because I believe these are the end times according to 2 Timothy 3. We all need to get closer to God because this world is going crazy. I refuse to participate!!
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
17 Mar 12
Another great response, there are many who would choose to follow God. I am encouraged.
1 person likes this