Shouod Some Classic Movies Just NOT Be Remade?  |
| |
| I got my idea for this discussion from a response to another discussion I posted recently about a classic sci-fi film. The poster said it would be great if the movie in question were to be remade with today's technology, that the new generation would then get to see it. I wasn't the only person to think this film at least didn't need to be remade, it was fine the way it was originally. This is not to speak poorly of change or new technology; we've all seen some old movies where the sound doesn't quite match the movement of the lips or where the scenery literally looks like cardboard paintings. However, "new" and "updated" does not always translate to "better". I think most of us will probably agree that about 99.999% of the time the original movie is better than any remakes that follow it, especially to those who saw the original first. I'm sure the fact we saw it first may have something to do with it, but that's not the whole answer. The original usually IS better, especially if the original was truly good or even GREAT because what's the point in trying to improve upon that which doesn't need improving? The same can often be said for sequels - the first is almost always the best with the sequels often being inferior imitations. There are certainly exceptions to this rule and as anything dealing with the arts and entertainment it's always subject to personal opinion, but don't you agree that some movies simply don't need to be, in fact should NOT be remade? I do understand why the studios do it, if a story was good and worked well a generation or more ago why not try to make it work again with an updated, modernized script and setting, new technology if applicable and actors young people today will want to go see? I've surely seen some remakes that I've really enjoyed. I've seen more than one remake of several movies in fact; I've lost count of how many times they've reworked "Invasion of the Body Snatchers"...lol! I just think some films, especially some of our finest classics, are quite enjoyable enough just as they are. What do you think? Are there any movies you hope they never remake? Are there any you really wish they would? (Feel free to provide your fantasy cast!) Annie | | | | | |
| |
| | Man Cheats Credit Score He Added 126 Points To His Credit Score Using This 1 Easy Tip. www.SecretsOfYourCreditScore.com
| Local Coupons 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Save 50-90% on your city's best! www.Groupon.com
| Movies Online The Best Movies Online TrailerAddict.com
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
1. eclecticeducation (101)
|
4 years ago
| | I don't know, sometimes I like the remake better than the original. I guess I kinda like that "up to date" feel to a movie, but there are some movies out there that I can't imagine as an update. Can you see a modern version of "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes"??? lol!!! | | | | | | |
OLIJULSAR (1063)
|
4 years ago
| | Would a better name be "Attack of the Organic Tomato?"...lol | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | OK, here comes true confession time... I've never seen "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes" but I understand it was one of George Clooney's earliest roles, right? I've been intending to rent that for the heck of it for years but keep forgetting. Annie | | | |
deebomb (10022)
|
4 years ago
| | anniepa No George Clooney wasn't in Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". It was made in 1978 He was attending Northern Kentucky University from 1979 to 1981 and into baseball before that. | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | You're right. Clooney was in the sequel, The Return of the Killer Tomatoes made in 1988. Annie | | | |
| |
| Man Cheats Credit Score He Added 126 Points To His Credit Score Using This 1 Easy Tip. www.SecretsOfYourCreditScore.com | add comment | | |
|
|
2. crimsonladybug (2545)
|
4 years ago
| | Pretty much, I think that classics are classics because of what they were and any attempts to remake them are going to come up short, new technology or not. I am all for exposing a new generation to a great classic but re-release it. I recently heard of two potential remakes that just about brought real, honest-to-gods tears to my eyes. One was Rocky Horror Picture Show, the other was The Crow. And not another Crow sequel but remaking the original with Eric Draven. I cannot fathom anyone in the current entertainment business who could hold a candle to Brandon Lee in that role. And RHPS..... Who in the world could possibly replace Tim Curry as Dr. Franke-N-Furter? I don't think it's possible. Unless they find some outrageous nobody in the UCLA film school or something like that. But drawing from the existing talent pool.... no way. And if they remake it, will seeing it in a theater be anything like seeing the original? With costumes and horrendous activities for the "Rocky Horror Virgins?" Rocky Horror is more than just a movie, it is an experience that should not be messed with. (P.S. I have seen it done as a stage performance and still nothing like the film) | | | | | | |
| |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | You're so right, there's nothing I can add! Thank you both for your responses. Annie | | | |
| |
| Local Coupons 1 ridiculously huge coupon a day. Save 50-90% on your city's best! www.Groupon.com | add comment | | |
|
|
3. crazydaisy (1714)
|
4 years ago
| | I feel that they should leave allot of old movies a lone and if we want to see them fine we should be able to get them if we want to at the store. cd | | | | | | |
| |
| Movies Online The Best Movies Online TrailerAddict.com | add comment | | |
|
|
4. Rozie37 (7134)
|
4 years ago
| | I do not know about many movies. But one movie that she have never been touched is "Cheaper By The Dozen." The remake is a complete joke, compared to the original. As it happened for me, I saw the remake, right after seeing the original for the first time. I loved the first one a lot. | | | | | | |
OLIJULSAR (1063)
|
4 years ago
| | I agree. I like Steve Martin movies but I thought this one feel short of the original.....especially the scene where they were all getting their tonsils out...lol | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | You're right. This is one of the perfect examples of a movie that should have been left alone. I also like Steve Martin but his version of "Cheaper By the Dozen" didn't do it justice. Annie | | | |
| |
| Your Local Search Looking For New Movies? Find It Nearby With Local.com! Local.com | add comment | | |
|
|
5. OLIJULSAR (1063)
|
4 years ago
| | I believe if the movie was a winner the first time around why try and change it. If it's not broke..why fix it? If you try to do remakes to bring it up to our day and time, usually some of the good scenes in the movie are deleted to try and upgrade them to this day and time. When they do this most times the movie and plot get lost in the translation to another generation. I say let them watch the original and see what the real movie was about. | | | | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | I couldn't possibly have said it better! I've loved many movies from many eras and I'm sure today's young people do too, or most of them would if they gave it a chance. Many of the movies I feel shouldn't be remade were made well before my time but there was no need to update them and when it comes to things like special effects, sometimes less is better. Another thing that sometimes happens when a remake is made is if the original starred someone who was "larger than life" to the point where the role belonged to him or her, the star or stars of the newer version don't really stand a chance to measure up. The best actor in the world wouldn't make it as good or better than the original so why put them through that? Annie | | | |
OLIJULSAR (1063)
|
4 years ago
| | I totally agree. I don't even like continuations of a movie unless they have the same actors in it. | | | |
| |
| Local Movie Theaters YELLOWPAGES.COM Official Site - yellowpages.com | add comment | | |
|
|
6. stephcjh (27638)
|
4 years ago
| | I think some classic movies should not be remade. they just are not the same with the same people most of the time. | | | | | | |
| |
| Film Products & Movies Save on Professional Film Products & Tons of Great Movies. Bargains! www.NexTag.com/Film | add comment | | |
|
|
7. Bd200789 (2164)
|
4 years ago
| | I don't usually like the remade movies. I loved The Manchurian Candidate, but I didn't like the newer version nearly as much. | | | | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | Same here. The new one was "OK" but it didn't measure up to the original at all. Annie | | | |
| |
| Watch TV On Your PC Watch TV Channels On Your PC. Digital TV on PC. Click Here! www.StopPayingCableBills.com | add comment | | |
|
|
8. mac1946 (1092)
|
4 years ago
| | They should never remake the old classics,with the tecknology today,they can fix up the colour and transfer the original to dvd format with all the original scenes,why destroy and loose the stars that made the movies great? | | | | | | |
| |
| Buy Onward - Books & More Save up to 30% on over 1 Million Book, Movie & Music titles! www.BuyOnward.com | add comment | | |
|
|
9. 1corner (384)
|
4 years ago
| | If the classic was very well-made, I agree, they shouldn't be re-made. I've always simply liked originals. Unfortunately, the movie industry doesn't work this way. Anything that would bring money in is the practice with them. Having said that, though, there are classics whose characters look better in modern-day attires, and hairdos. | | | | | | |
| kellyjack (6)
|
4 years ago
| | I'm not real big into Horror films but I recently watched Texas Chain saw Massacre and there is no way you replace the retard family and Leather face with todays actors. You had to have that B-movie feel to pull that off,Leather face got all the press but his Father and brother should have won some type of award,could you really be acting to act that way. | | | |
1corner (384)
|
4 years ago
| | I've never watched that myself. (Plus, I'm not into horror movies that much.) What came to mind when I wrote the last statement was the Narnia movie "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe." I saw the one made in the '70's, and the recent one. Prefer the 2nd version a whole lot more. I'm sure the first attempt was thought cool back then, though. | | | |
| |
| movies Enter The Sweeps For A Chance To Win A Movie Lover's Prize Package AARP.Promo.Eprize.com | add comment | | |
|
|
10. lilwonders456 (3526)
|
4 years ago
| | Gone with the wind. It should never be redone. THey would only mess it up. Leave it alone. To tell you the truth I can not think of one remake that I have liked as much as the orginal. | | | | | | |
anniepa (11669)
|
4 years ago
| | I can't either, Lil, and I'm SOOO glad they haven't remade Gone With the Wind! Reading this post from you really proves my point - you're young, MUCH younger than me, yet you still appreciate a classic like Gone With the Wind, which came out when my mother was a young woman. I can't even begin to imagine who would play the major roles in a new version of that gem. There are many beautiful and talented young actresses but Vivien Leigh WAS Scarlet O'Hara, pure and simple as that! Annie | | | |
| |
| SAVE BIG on Blu-Ray BUY Online. Free Super Saving Shipping. Huge Collection. www.amazon.com | add comment | | |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |